The Olympics had a negligible direct impact on China’s economy, but analysts say the near flawless organization of the Games was a priceless 17-day advertisement for the “Made in China” brand.
Billions of television viewers saw athletes performing in gleaming high-tech stadiums in a city rebuilt by some of the world’s most renowned architects, projecting the image of a modern and cutting edge economy.
For a country traditionally seen as a low-cost manufacturing hub which had been damaged by scandals over shoddily made toys sent to the US and spoiled food shipped to Japan, the Olympics was a timely re-branding exercise.
“If you go back 12 months, ‘brand China’ was in tremendous difficulties with toxic toys and a number of other issues,” said Beijing-based Greg Paull, who runs market research firm R3. “They’ve come a long way in a year.”
A virtually glitch-free Games in terms of organization could bring profound changes in the way China is seen by the rest of the world.
“China’s amazing haul of gold medals has mirrored its spectacular economic growth to signal to the world that China has truly arrived,” said Seth Grossman, a Shanghai executive with media communications agency Carat China.
“From the grandeur of the opening ceremony to the self-assured way Chinese athletes expected to win in so many events, China exceeded every expectation.”
Paull said many Chinese companies would be able to use the Olympic dividend to expand outside their domestic market and make their mark on the global stage.
He cited the example of sportswear maker Li Ning (李寧), whose founder lit the flame at the Olympic opening ceremony on August 8 after a spectacular skywalk around the top of the “Bird’s Nest” stadium.
“Companies like Li Ning that are looking to expand globally are going to use the Olympics as a chance to do that,” Paull said.
China is the world’s fourth-biggest economy. While Beijing says it spent more than US$40 billion on hosting the Games, the concrete impact on the economy was always going to be minimal.
Beijing hotels have complained of receiving fewer visitors than they expected, with the occupancy rates for three-star hotels and lower lingering under 40 percent, the Beijing Statistical Bureau said.
“Before the Games, people were anticipating a business boom in tourism, benefiting hotels, airlines and local restaurants,” said Li Wei, an analyst with Standard Chartered. “Now it’s becoming clear that the impact wasn’t all that big. I don’t think industries like that are likely to benefit greatly from one month of Olympics and Paralympics.”
But to many analysts measuring the impact of the Games, it was never going to be a simple question of this month’s tourism revenue.
Instead they focused on the big picture, the profound changes taking place in China and their effect on the rest of the world.
“Analyzing the one-off macroeconomic impact, or the ‘economics of the Games,’ is not really an issue of such great importance,” Daniel Chui (崔永昌), head of investor communications at JF Asset Management, said in the China Daily.
Focusing on the little figures might even distract attention from the fact that we are witnessing an epoch-defining event, he argued.
“The Beijing Olympics are another milepost in China’s transformation into an efficient, market-oriented and financially sophisticated economy and a more open society,” he said.
RISK REMAINS: An official said that with the US presidential elections so close, it is unclear if China would hold war games or keep its reaction to angry words The Ministry of National Defense said it was “on alert” as it detected a Chinese aircraft carrier group to Taiwan’s south yesterday amid concerns in Taiwan about the possibility of a new round of Chinese war games. The ministry said in a statement that a Chinese navy group led by the carrier Liaoning had entered waters near the Bashi Channel, which connects the South China Sea and the Pacific Ocean and separates Taiwan from the Philippines. It said the carrier group was expected to enter the Western Pacific. The military is keeping a close watch on developments and “exercising an
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
RESILIENCE: Once the system is operational, there would be no need to worry about the risks posed by disasters or other emergencies on communication systems, an official said Taiwan would have 24-hour access to low Earth orbit satellites by the end of this month through service provided by Eutelsat OneWeb as part of the nation’s effort to enhance signal resilience, a Chunghwa Telecom Co (中華電信) official said yesterday. Earlier this year the Ministry of Digital Affairs, which partnered with Chunghwa Telecom on a two-year project to boost signal resilience throughout the nation, said it reached a milestone when it made contact with OneWeb’s satellites half of the time. It expects to have the capability to maintain constant contact with the satellites and have nationwide coverage by the end
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
RSS