Fifty years after the first Japanese car coughed its way up the Hollywood Hills, it's hard to imagine a time when the Big Three US automakers sold 95 percent of the cars on the road.
About half of new car sales today are now going to foreign brands and Toyota, which overtook Chrysler last year, is widely expected to knock Ford Motor Co out of the No. 2 spot this year.
Meanwhile, the mighty United Auto Workers (UAW) union, which for generations had helped set the standard for worker benefits and wages in the US, is in the midst of ceding significant ground in the face of competition from non-unionized foreign shops.
"The first wave was a price wave. Then it was a fuel economy wave. Then it became a quality wave. And at every wave the Japanese imports built a position that was very strong," said David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research.
"What has developed since then is the inability [of the Big Three] to compete against well-financed, global companies that had significantly lower costs," he said.
It didn't have to be that way.
The first car Toyota Motor Sales introduced after opening its US operations on Oct. 31, 1957, was a complete flop.
Ford, Chrysler and General Motors Corp were in their golden age, building elegant status symbols which helped cement the US love affair with cars and shape the structure of US cities.
Japanese products were seen as cheap and of poor quality, and Toyota did little to change these perceptions.
Used as taxis on Tokyo's bumpy post-war roads, the Toyopet was uncomfortable, plain and had an engine so weak that "loud, threatening noises radiated from under the hood" when it was driven up steep hills, Toyota admitted in a retrospective.
Toyota had sold just 2,314 Toyopets when it was replaced in 1965 with the Corona, which was designed for US roads and drivers.
The Corona was a hit, pushing Toyota into the number two spot for import cars by 1969. But import sales comprised just 11 percent of the US market and remained dominated by Volkswagen, which sold nearly five times as many cars as Toyota.
It wasn't until the oil crises and economic downturns of the 1970s that the inexpensive, fuel efficient cars produced by Toyota and other Japanese automakers began to pose a serious challenge.
By 1979, the situation was critical in Detroit when Chrysler, on the verge of bankruptcy, had to be bailed out by the federal government with US$1.5 billion in guaranteed loans.
As US plants were shuttered in the face of growing sales of Japanese brands and Japanese investors started buying landmarks like the Rockefeller Center, a strong backlash was growing.
Frustrated auto workers, and even politicians, took sledgehammers to Japanese cars in publicity stunts and private moments of frustration.
But while the Japanese may have been aggressive in pursuing sales, much of the damage done to US automakers was self-inflicted, said Jeremy Anwyl, president of Edmunds.com.
"If you look at the products the Big Three brought out ... you had car after car being introduced that were a disaster after a disaster," he said in a telephone interview.
"You had engines that would break down at just 30,000 miles [48,280km]," he said. "This stuff went on for 15 years before they started turning things around."
Just as the Big Three were finally starting to address their quality and productivity problems, another economic downturn hit in 2000 and then gas prices started to rise again.
Consumers shied away from the gas-guzzling sports utility vehicles whose high margins had subsidized the Big Three's underperforming small cars.
And the market share of US automakers, which had spent much of the 1980s and early 1990s in the mid to low 1970s, dropped to 66 percent in 2000, 55 percent last year, and is now hovering at 50 percent, according to Ward's Auto.
Tens of thousands of autoworkers have lost their jobs as plant after plant was shuttered, devastating scores of midwestern towns.
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
EMBRACING TAIWAN: US lawmakers have introduced an act aiming to replace the use of ‘Chinese Taipei’ with ‘Taiwan’ across all Washington’s federal agencies A group of US House of Representatives lawmakers has introduced legislation to replace the term “Chinese Taipei” with “Taiwan” across all federal agencies. US Representative Byron Donalds announced the introduction of the “America supports Taiwan act,” which would mandate federal agencies adopt “Taiwan” in place of “Chinese Taipei,” a news release on his page on the US House of Representatives’ Web site said. US representatives Mike Collins, Barry Moore and Tom Tiffany are cosponsors of the legislation, US political newspaper The Hill reported yesterday. “The legislation is a push to normalize the position of Taiwan as an autonomous country, although the official US
CHANGE OF TONE: G7 foreign ministers dropped past reassurances that there is no change in the position of the G7 members on Taiwan, including ‘one China’ policies G7 foreign ministers on Friday took a tough stance on China, stepping up their language on Taiwan and omitting some conciliatory references from past statements, including to “one China” policies. A statement by ministers meeting in Canada mirrored last month’s Japan-US statement in condemning “coercion” toward Taiwan. Compared with a G7 foreign ministers’ statement in November last year, the statement added members’ concerns over China’s nuclear buildup, although it omitted references to their concerns about Beijing’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. Also missing were references stressing the desire for “constructive and stable relations with China” and
RSS