The flood of Chinese exports following the end of the global textile trade quota system has set off protectionist alarms in the West and threatened the jobs of millions of workers in poorer countries.
The US and the EU last week triggered processes to limit textiles imports from China, sparking an angry response from the rising Asian giant that it would not be pushed around on the issue.
Elsewhere in Asia, countries that had long enjoyed the benefits of the trade quotas, such as Bangladesh, Cambodia, Sri Lanka and Vietnam, have warned their textile industries and the people they employ are fast losing out to China.
However the end of the quota system has not been all bad news, with more competitive and better prepared industries in the Philippines, Indonesia and India reporting they are weathering the China storm.
The event that threw the US$400-billion-a-year global textile industry into turmoil was the end of the 1974 Multifiber Arrangement on Jan. 1 this year, which lifted quotas and restrictions on exports.
China, already the world's largest exporter of clothing at the beginning of this year with a 28 percent share of the market, has enjoyed a phenomenal boom following the end of the quotas.
The US government took its first step toward curbing Chinese textile imports on Monday last week by announcing a review to determine whether the recent surge in Chinese imports had disrupted the US market.
US officials said Chinese imports of cotton knit shirts and blouses, cotton trousers and man-made-fiber underwear had surged by about 1,250 percent, 1,500 percent and 300 percent respectively, following the end of the quotas.
The US government review move could lead to Washington limiting growth in Chinese imports to 7.5 percent through 2008, under a clause China agreed to upon entering the WTO.
The EU adopted a similar measure on Wednesday when it unveiled "alert levels" at which it would consider limiting Chinese clothing imports, but resisted pressure from Europe's textile industry for more drastic action.
In response, Chinese commerce ministry spokesman Chong Quan (崇泉) on Thursday warned the actions of the EU and the US violated free trade principles and could jeopardize global textile trade.
The responses of all three parties have sparked concerns that tit-for-tat action could lead to a trade war.
"The danger is that the textile issue becomes the straw that breaks the camel's back," said Ernest Bower, a partner with Washington-based consultancy BrooksBowerAsia.
Bower said the EU and the US "should not impose new measures on China" if they were genuine in their free trade principles.
"If the US and Europe favor free trade, they must be consistent and not fight rear-guard actions like those being proposed by protectionist groups," he said.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications yesterday inaugurated the Danjiang Bridge across the Tamsui River in New Taipei City, saying that the structure would be an architectural icon and traffic artery for Taiwan. Feted as a major engineering achievement, the Danjiang Bridge is 920m long, 211m tall at the top of its pylon, and is the longest single-pylon asymmetric cable-stayed bridge in the world, the government’s Web site for the structure said. It was designed by late Iraqi-British architect Zaha Hadid. The structure, with a maximum deck of 70m, accommodates road and light rail traffic, and affords a 200m navigation channel for boats,
PRECISION STRIKES: The most significant reason to deploy HIMARS to outlying islands is to establish a ‘dead zone’ that the PLA would not dare enter, a source said A High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) would be deployed to Penghu County and Dongyin Island (東引) in Lienchiang County (Matsu) to force the Chinese military to retreat at least 100km from the coastline, a military source said yesterday. Taiwan has been procuring HIMARS and Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) from the US in batches. Once all batches have been delivered, Taiwan would possess 111 HIMARS units and 504 ATACMS, which have a range of 300km. Considering that “offense is the best defense,” the military plans to forward-deploy the systems to outlying islands such as Penghu and Dongyin so that
WHAT WAS ALL THAT FOR? Jaw Shaw-kong said that Cheng Li-wen had pushed for more drastic cuts and attacked him, just for the outcome to be nearly identical to his bill The legislature yesterday passed a supplementary budget bill to fund the purchase of separate packages of US military equipment, with the combined amount of spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.8 billion). The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) used their legislative majority to pass the bill, which runs until 2033 and has two main funding provisions. One was for NT$300 billion of arms sales already approved by the US for Taiwan on Dec. 17 last year, the other was for NT$480 billion for another arms package expected to be announced by Washington. The bill, which fell short of the NT$1.25
‘CLEAR MESSAGE’: The bill would set up an interagency ‘tiger team’ to review sanctions tools and other economic options to help deter any Chinese aggression toward Taiwan US Representative Young Kim has introduced a bill to deter Chinese aggression against Taiwan, calling for an interagency “tiger team” to preplan coordinated sanctions and economic measures in response to possible Chinese military or political action against Taiwan. “[Chinese President] Xi Jinping [習近平] has directed the People’s Liberation Army to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. China has a plan. America should have one too,” Kim said in a news release on Thursday last week. She introduced the “Deter PRC [People’s Republic of China] aggression against Taiwan act” to “ensure the US has a coordinated sanctions strategy ready should