Virgin Blue wants to spread its wings to Asia but the successful Australian discount airline vows not to rush into any deals just to catch up with rival Qantas' regional budget carrier venture.
"We do want to have a look in this part of the world," chief executive Brett Godfrey said on the sidelines of last week's International Air Transport Association (IATA) meeting in Singapore.
Nothing firm has been agreed with any partner but Godfrey is confident that Virgin Blue, founded by flamboyant British entrepreneur Richard Branson, will be able to find a suitable ally in the next few years.
Officials of Malaysia's no-frills carrier AirAsia said they have had discussions with Virgin Blue, but Godfrey is not naming potential partners.
"I have spoken to many airlines and carriers but we are particularly fussy as to what interests us," said Godfrey. "We had a couple of propositions to which we weren't interested.
"So it may not be today, it may not be next year. It may be within two or three years but I would like to think there are opportunities for us here. I'll be surprised if there wasn't."
He concedes Qantas will have a headstart with its Singapore-based venture, which has yet to be named, aiming to begin commercial flights by the end of 2004.
Qantas teamed up with Singapore's state investment arm Temasek Holdings and two Singaporean businessmen to launch the service.
But Godfrey said that "a headstart in the airline business never lasts you too long."
"If nothing comes along [immediately], there's plenty of other opportunities for us.
"That's why I am saying I'll be foolish to rush into anything anyway."
Godfrey's patience also stems from the view that the region's rapid industrialization has yet to filter down to areas outside the main cities.
"Most of the markets which we would ultimately serve probably don't exist yet because there is no airport, or there is no one that lives there that can afford to fly, but that's all changing," said Godfrey.
But he said the economies of China, India and other Asian countries were growing at such a phenomenal rate that people who now couldn't afford the cost of a budget airline ticket would be able to do so in five or 10 years.
Low-fare carriers led by three-year-old AirAsia have taken the region by storm in recent months.
Singapore Airlines is also jostling for a piece of the action by setting up Tiger Airways.
Another Singapore discount carrier, Valuair, started flying to Hong Kong and Bangkok last month and is looking to expand its routes to other cities within a five-hour flight from the city-state.
According to IATA statistics, the market share of budget carriers in the Asian market is only two percent, compared with 16 percent in Europe and 23 percent in North America, indicating a lot of room for growth.
Under Godfrey's watch, Virgin Blue has captured at least a third of Australia's domestic travel market from Qantas since its launch in 2000, and he is confident it will be successful in Asia as well.
Virgin Blue last month reported a higher-than-expected 47 percent jump in annual net profit to US$110 million in the year to March. It was the carrier's first annual results since becoming a listed company last December.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS