WTO director general Supachai Panitchpakdi warned economic leaders Sunday that missing an deadline at the end of next year for freeing up world trade would be "damaging" for the global economy.
Trade negotiators missed a deadline in March to strike a deal on the critical area of agricultural trade, raising some questions about the timing of an overall agreement.
"There is no reason to begin doubting the possibility of meeting the target date of end-2004 for finishing the negotiations," Supachai told policymakers here of the 184-nation World Bank and IMF.
"No reason, that is, unless governments decide that their political will to complete the exercise is no longer there," he said.
"And that, surely, would send a very damaging signal around the world -- damaging to the prospects for economic recovery, and damaging too for the process of multilateral cooperation in general."
Ministers from WTO member states agreed at a conference in Doha in November 2001 to launch the current round of trade negotiations. They set a three-year deadline for completion. The agenda included a call for phasing agricultural export subsidies, a bone of contention for developing countries, which say they are being priced out of world markets by rich nations.
"Given the level of ambition of the Doha Round, it is inevitable that we have hit some bumps along the road," Supachai said.
Political will and a convergence of positions are critical for the success of the WTO, he said.
"Starting to roll back levels of ambition for the trade negotiations is no answer," Supachai said.
"It would quickly spiral downwards, as more and more trade-offs are closed out, condemning the negotiations to insignificance in the eyes of developing countries and of business worldwide," Supachai said.
"Nowhere is that more true than in the negotiations on agriculture, a sector that is of vital economic significance to a large number of WTO members. Nothing would be served by producing a minimalist approach."
Supachai said politicians must stop seeing agriculture as a matter of purely domestic concern and realize its importance for poverty reduction and international security.
"Rural poverty is the most endemic and corrosive form of poverty in the world. Continuing high levels of restriction and distortion to agricultural trade are a large part of the problem. They must be brought down."
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
RSS