The bear market turned out to have another leg after all.
Following the brief, nervous rally of the summer, global share prices have taken another step down. The US market is grim, European markets dreadful.
Germany's DAX index is down 39 percent this year, France's CAC 40 is off 34 percent, and Britain's FTSE has fallen by 25 percent. Overall, the Bloomberg European 500 index is down 28 percent.
Nobody has to search for reasons to be gloomy. Bear signals drop from the trees like low-hanging fruit.
In Germany, a government that made virtually no progress on economic reform in its first term has just been re-elected with a wafer-thin majority and increased power for its Green Party allies. Even the weak reforming impetus of Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder's first term is likely to fade.
In France, consumer spending has started falling, as unemployment rises, killing any hopes that its new government is going to engineer a rapid recovery.
In the Netherlands, consumer confidence has just fallen to its lowest level since records began in 1986, and the Dutch economy is expected to grow at only 0.5 percent this year, the lowest rate in 15 years.
The European Central Bank looks to be refusing to contemplate lower interest rates, even as Europe's slips closer to recession. Otmar Issing, the ECB's chief economist, said this week he believed rates were "appropriate," while Vice President Lucas Papademos said there was no pressure to cut. What he might regard as "pressure," he didn't say.
Those are all perfectly good reasons for selling equities.
But the big, dark cloud hanging over the markets is Iraq.
Until it is clear whether there will be a war, and until it is clear how quickly and cleanly that war will be won, there is little prospect of any recovery in equities.
Until the shooting starts, the markets will remain depressed.
A war with Iraq would have a huge impact on the global economy -- the issue for the markets is how to price that.
How much is the war likely to cost? Nobody quite knows.
Lawrence Lindsey, economic adviser to US President George W. Bush, has said it could cost as much as US$200 billion. That figure has been disputed by the White House.
The truth is any figure from US$20 billion to US$200 billion is plausible. Even when the cost is known, how will it be paid for? Will US taxes rise, or will the government borrow more? Again, no one knows.
The impact on the oil price is just as imponderable. A liberated pro-Western Iraq would pump oil furiously, maybe sparking a savage price war between OPEC and Russia. Oil at US$10 a barrel for a generation? Maybe.
A longer, nastier war could restrict supplies out of the Middle East, possibly permanently. Oil at US$45 a barrel for a generation? Maybe.
The impact on business and consumer confidence is no more certain. After a quick victory, confidence would soar, and the re-construction of Iraq would begin. A longer war would pose the issue of tax rises, and it could devastate the travel and tourism industries.
Now try to figure out what all that means for the next five years of earnings at Volkswagen AG or HSBC Group Plc.
It's hardly surprising that people are giving up.
Pricing future events is what the stock markets does, and usually it is good at it. Corporate earnings, industry trends, changes in interest rates, and changes of government, are all events the stock market can take in its stride. It can weigh the odds and come up with a price.
A war is different. The markets can look back to the Gulf War a decade ago, and draw some lessons. Ultimately, investors have no more insight into how the war might go than the average Joe in the street. The market has no mechanism for measuring the different options, or for deciding which outcome is the most likely.
In those circumstances, the most rational response is to sit on your hands and do nothing -- and, when the occasion presents itself, sell a bit more of your portfolio. The market's current judgement -- roughly translated as "we don't have a clue what's happening" -- is just about right.
UPDATED (3:40pm): A suspected gas explosion at a shopping mall in Taichung this morning has killed four people and injured 20 others, as emergency responders continue to investigate. The explosion occurred on the 12th floor of the Shin Kong Mitsukoshi in Situn District (西屯) at 11:33am. One person was declared dead at the scene, while three people were declared deceased later after receiving emergency treatment. Another 20 people sustained major or minor injuries. The Taichung Fire Bureau said it received a report of the explosion at 11:33am and sent rescuers to respond. The cause of the explosion is still under investigation, it said. The National Fire
ACCOUNTABILITY: The incident, which occured at a Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Department Store in Taichung, was allegedly caused by a gas explosion on the 12th floor Shin Kong Group (新光集團) president Richard Wu (吳昕陽) yesterday said the company would take responsibility for an apparent gas explosion that resulted in four deaths and 26 injuries at Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Zhonggang Store in Taichung yesterday. The Taichung Fire Bureau at 11:33am yesterday received a report saying that people were injured after an explosion at the department store on Section 3 of Taiwan Boulevard in Taichung’s Situn District (西屯). It sent 56 ambulances and 136 paramedics to the site, with the people injured sent to Cheng Ching Hospital’s Chung Kang Branch, Wuri Lin Shin Hospital, Taichung Veterans General Hospital or Chung
ALL-IN-ONE: A company in Tainan and another in New Taipei City offer tours to China during which Taiwanese can apply for a Chinese ID card, the source said The National Immigration Agency and national security authorities have identified at least five companies that help Taiwanese apply for Chinese identification cards while traveling in China, a source said yesterday. The issue has garnered attention in the past few months after YouTuber “Pa Chiung” (八炯) said that there are companies in Taiwan that help Taiwanese apply for Chinese documents. Minister of the Interior Liu Shyh-fang (劉世芳) last week said that three to five public relations firms in southern and northern Taiwan have allegedly assisted Taiwanese in applying for Chinese ID cards and were under investigation for potential contraventions of the Act Governing
‘LAWFUL USE’: The last time a US warship transited the Taiwan Strait was on Oct. 20 last year, and this week’s transit is the first of US President Donald Trump’s second term Two US military vessels transited the Taiwan Strait from Sunday through early yesterday, the Ministry of National Defense said in a statement, the first such mission since US President Donald Trump took office last month. The two vessels sailed south through the Strait, the ministry said, adding that it closely monitored nearby airspace and waters at the time and observed nothing unusual. The ministry did not name the two vessels, but the US Navy identified them as the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Ralph Johnson and the Pathfinder-class survey ship USNS Bowditch. The ships carried out a north-to-south transit from