The dollar rounded out its best week in the past seven against the yen on hopes the war in Afghanistan may end soon and amid signs of recovery in the US economy.
US-backed opponents of the Taliban gained ground in Afghanistan this week, easing concern a prolonged war would damage US consumer confidence and make investors shun the world's biggest economy. A better-than-forecast retail sales report also heightened optimism for US prospects.
"There's a general feeling it's moving in the right direction," Nigel Jenkins, head of fixed income and currencies at WestAM in London, said of the war in Afghanistan. Combined with "a very significant reappraisal" this week of chances for a US economic rebound, that has fueled dollar buying, he said.
The greenback rose to ?122.83, from ?122.40 on Thursday, and gained 2 percent from last Friday, its best showing since September. The dollar slipped to US$0.8841 per euro, from US$0.8817 late Friday in New York. It gained 1 percent this week against the euro, the largest advance in a month.
Also triggering yen selling was a Kyodo News report that five Japanese credit unions had filed for bankruptcy, said Michael Malpede, senior currency analyst at Refco Inc in Chicago. The report fueled concern that the health of Japan's financial system and prospects for its economy are deteriorating, said traders.
WestAM's Jenkins said his unit, which manages 2 billion euros (US$1.8 billion), sold yen for dollars at about ?120 this week.
The trade was based on expectations Japan's government would prevent the yen from appreciating past that level and on the view that the Bank of Japan in coming months would pump funds into the financial system to help the nation's banks, triggering a yen decline toward 130 per dollar, said Jenkins.
As the opposition to the Taliban gained territory this week, investors bet an eventual victory and the potential capture of suspected terrorist leader Osama bin Laden would reduce the threat of terrorism and leave the US poised to be the first major economy to recover from the global slump.
Better growth prospects in the US economy, which shrank at an annual rate of 0.4 percent in the third quarter, may lure investors to US assets and the currency needed to buy them.
The news from Afghanistan "has certainly removed a lot of global geo-political risk, which you'd expect to benefit the dollar," said Scott Jamieson, who manages US$60 million at Abbey National Plc's Talorcan hedge fund in Glasgow, Scotland. Still, ``in a calmer world, people may move to other currencies and not just put all their eggs in Uncle Sam's basket.''
A record jump in retail sales in October, reported Wednesday, suggested the economy may be better off than previously thought.
Even so, other statistics may call that optimism into question.
A Fed report today showed US industrial production sank 1.1 percent in October, more than the expected 0.9 percent decline and the 13th consecutive monthly drop.
Lending support to the euro, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder won a confidence vote in parliament, approving the use of troops to support the US in Afghanistan and avoiding the collapse of his coalition government.
The vote helped the euro because "I don't think you run money to places where they're dissolving governments," said Malpede at Refco.
In coming weeks, traders said they'll be focusing on earnings reports from Japanese banks to gauge how much the institutions' stock holdings have fallen in value in recent months, which could erode the banks' finances.
The US dollar strngthened to US$1.4272 per British pound from US$1.4320, and fell to SF1.6574 from SF1.6613.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering