EU Trade Commissioner Pascal Lamy compared the WTO to someone who has survived a serious accident and still bears the scars. US Trade Representative Robert Zoellick talked about removing the stain.
The shadow of Seattle -- the 1999 meeting of trade ministers that ended in abject failure while outside police fired tear gas at rioting protesters -- hung over this week's desert meeting as it has hung over everything the WTO has done for the past two years.
When ministers agreed on Wednesday to launch a new round of trade liberalization negotiations, they were all hoping that they had put Seattle out of their minds forever.
"This is particularly sweet since I suppose the WTO rises from the Seattle ashes," said Sergio Marchi, Canada's ambassador to the WTO.
"We have removed the stain of Seattle," said Zoellick.
The failure of the Seattle meeting did much more than just delay the trade round by two years.
Work that was already underway -- such as discussions on how to improve the WTO's fledgling dispute settlement system -- was halted because ministers had failed to renew the mandate.
But most of all the failure of Seattle left negotiators paralyzed and traumatized, unable to find the momentum to get their work back on track.
At the WTO's Geneva headquarters, the autopsies continued for months, as ambassadors tried to understand what had happened.
Most agree on what they did wrong -- they went to Seattle with overambitious plans and then tried to steamroller them through.
Developing countries, already complaining that they had lost out overall from the last round, decided enough was enough. Presented with a fait accompli drafted in meetings from which they were excluded, they exercised their collective muscle and blocked the consensus.
"Seattle failed for a lot of reasons, but the most important reason was because of democratic choice. Governments have the right to disagree," said WTO Director-General Mike Moore.
The Doha meeting, however, was always going to be different. Seattle had taken place at the height of an economic boom, Doha as the world faced slowdown and possible recession; the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks had given a new impetus to anything that looked like a show of global cooperation; and nobody underestimated the developing countries this time.
Despite the tough negotiations and the holdouts by a number of countries that drove the meeting into an unplanned sixth day, this time all nations wanted the trade round.
Even so, Lamy admitted that that he had feared the talks would collapse, because of what he termed the "Seattle syndrome."
"People who have lived through an accident ... keep a sort of scar or sensitivity," he said.
Ministers left Qatar Wednesday on a high, claiming that the ghost of Seattle had been forever laid to rest.
However, one part of the Seattle experience seems to have been skipped in Doha rather than overcome -- the grass-roots protests that were born there and have followed every major economic meeting since.
Demonstrators had claimed credit for the Seattle collapse, though it was clearly political and economic differences among the negotiators that doomed those talks.
The expense of getting to Doha, combined with the strict Qatari visa requirements and a temporary lull in the zeal to protest following the terror attacks and the US strike on Afghanistan meant that negotiators were faced with little more in the way of protests than members of Greenpeace dropping WTO agreements into a large recycling bin.
But the demonstrators say they will be back. And their concerns, they say, have not been allayed by the governmental show of unity in Doha.
RISK REMAINS: An official said that with the US presidential elections so close, it is unclear if China would hold war games or keep its reaction to angry words The Ministry of National Defense said it was “on alert” as it detected a Chinese aircraft carrier group to Taiwan’s south yesterday amid concerns in Taiwan about the possibility of a new round of Chinese war games. The ministry said in a statement that a Chinese navy group led by the carrier Liaoning had entered waters near the Bashi Channel, which connects the South China Sea and the Pacific Ocean and separates Taiwan from the Philippines. It said the carrier group was expected to enter the Western Pacific. The military is keeping a close watch on developments and “exercising an
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of