Before Sept. 11, the anti-globalization movement had caused considerable turmoil, sending armies of noisy and sometimes-violent protesters onto the streets of Seattle, Philadelphia and Quebec City and setting its sights on Washington.
But the movement has been mostly quiet since terrorists hijacked four US airliners and crashed them into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a Pennsylvania field, killing thousands.
"After Sept. 11, I don't think the public is going to identify with people running around in masks and vandalizing property," said Randy Newnham, 26, who participated in the 1999 World Trade Organization protests in Seattle in which 50,000 people caused an estimated US$3 million in damage during four days of rioting.
Across the country, words of caution are now coming from activists known for protesting what they say are large corporations' efforts to increase their power over people's lives worldwide.
"We don't want to do or say anything that would be perceived as insensitive or uncaring to family members of the victims," said Jody Dodd of the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom in Philadelphia.
In the view of many anti-globalization activists, greed among Western corporations is at least partly to blame for producing a climate in which someone like Osama bin Laden, the government's prime suspect in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, can be seen as a savior.
"If you go to the Middle East, you see that the invasion of Western corporate culture raises anger. They sense that their societies are being torn apart by this invading Western culture and economics. Out of that sense of dislocation and desperation, scary things can develop," said Mark Andersen with Washington-based Positive Force.
"If you want to make the world safer, you have to change that atmosphere," said Jason Mark of Global Exchange, a San Francisco-based group that helped organize the WTO protests in Seattle.
But this is not a message anti-globalization protesters are taking to the streets in large numbers right now. There have been no major anti-globalization protests since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
Demonstrators had planned to protest the International Monetary Fund and World Bank's annual meeting Sept. 29 to Sept. 30 in Washington, DC, but after the terrorist attacks, the groups called off their protests out of respect for the victims. The IMF and World Bank canceled the meeting the following day.
Instead of an anti-globalization rally, the few thousand protesters who showed up in Washington those days demonstrated against war. Some dressed as peace doves, others waved signs with anti-war sentiments such as "War will not bring our loved ones back."
Anti-war movements have appeared on some US campuses since President George W. Bush announced his war on terrorism.
At the University of Oregon, ranked by Mother Jones magazine as the nation's most activist-friendly campus last year, about 200 people turned out for a recent peace rally. Vietnam-era war protests, by comparison, drew thousands.
Unlike the Vietnam War, which many Americans viewed as a distant conflict, the war on terrorism has a more immediate connection, said political analyst Gary Malecha of the University of Portland.
"The perception is that the United States has come under attack and that now is the time for the country to unite. So any kind of civil disturbance would only get people agitated," Malecha said.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications yesterday inaugurated the Danjiang Bridge across the Tamsui River in New Taipei City, saying that the structure would be an architectural icon and traffic artery for Taiwan. Feted as a major engineering achievement, the Danjiang Bridge is 920m long, 211m tall at the top of its pylon, and is the longest single-pylon asymmetric cable-stayed bridge in the world, the government’s Web site for the structure said. It was designed by late Iraqi-British architect Zaha Hadid. The structure, with a maximum deck of 70m, accommodates road and light rail traffic, and affords a 200m navigation channel for boats,
PRECISION STRIKES: The most significant reason to deploy HIMARS to outlying islands is to establish a ‘dead zone’ that the PLA would not dare enter, a source said A High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) would be deployed to Penghu County and Dongyin Island (東引) in Lienchiang County (Matsu) to force the Chinese military to retreat at least 100km from the coastline, a military source said yesterday. Taiwan has been procuring HIMARS and Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) from the US in batches. Once all batches have been delivered, Taiwan would possess 111 HIMARS units and 504 ATACMS, which have a range of 300km. Considering that “offense is the best defense,” the military plans to forward-deploy the systems to outlying islands such as Penghu and Dongyin so that
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s largest foundry service provider, yesterday said that global semiconductor revenue is projected to hit US$1.5 trillion in 2030, after the figure exceeds US$1 trillion this year, as artificial intelligence (AI) demand boosts consumption of token and compute power. “We are still at the beginning of the AI revolution, but we already see a significant impact across the whole semiconductor ecosystem,” TSMC deputy cochief operating officer Kevin Zhang (張曉強) said at the company’s annual technology symposium in Hsinchu City. “It is fair to say that in the past decade, smartphones and other mobile devices were
‘CLEAR MESSAGE’: The bill would set up an interagency ‘tiger team’ to review sanctions tools and other economic options to help deter any Chinese aggression toward Taiwan US Representative Young Kim has introduced a bill to deter Chinese aggression against Taiwan, calling for an interagency “tiger team” to preplan coordinated sanctions and economic measures in response to possible Chinese military or political action against Taiwan. “[Chinese President] Xi Jinping [習近平] has directed the People’s Liberation Army to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. China has a plan. America should have one too,” Kim said in a news release on Thursday last week. She introduced the “Deter PRC [People’s Republic of China] aggression against Taiwan act” to “ensure the US has a coordinated sanctions strategy ready should