In a terror-induced climate of heightened electronic vigilance, debate is brewing over whether makers of encryption software should be obliged to provide law enforcement agencies with the keys to open scrambled messages.
Phil Zimmermann and fellow encryption supporters thought they had won the battle two years ago when the US government decided to permit the export of full-strength encryption software without requiring programmers to hand over spare keys.
The Sept. 11 attacks changed the atmosphere, and at least one senator has since called for making keys available. US intelligence says Osama bin Laden's terrorist organization has used e-mail and encryption to communicate.
Currently, agents monitoring e-mail traffic may know two suspected terrorists are talking but can't determine what they are saying. Giving government the keys could help terrorists before they strike, says Gene Poteat, president of the Association of Former Intelligence Officers.
"You have to be quicker on your feet," Poteat said. "You have to have the keys to be able to intercept the messages quicker."
In a Sept. 14 Newsweek poll, 54 percent of Americans said they would support eroding encryption protection to help law enforcement monitor terrorism suspects -- even if it might affect privacy and business practices. Thirty-nine percent were opposed, the rest undecided.
Zimmermann, inventor of the most popular technique for encrypting e-mail, insists the arguments have not changed, even if the circumstances have. He said encryption's potential use by terrorists and criminals was central to the debate that raged through the 1990s.
"Our society collectively decided that strong crypto had more benefits for society than harm," Zimmermann said. "If we try to reverse that ... under incredible emotional pressure, we will make a terrible mistake."
For decades, the government classified encryption as munitions and tried to keep it from the private sector and foreigners. But mathematicians outside government developed encryption independently in the 1980s -- and Zimmermann released his Pretty Good Privacy software in 1991.
The government then tried to block its export and sought to require a ``back door'' accessible to law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Under some "key escrow" systems proposed, users encrypting messages would turn over a copy of their keys to a third party, or software manufacturers would build in a second key that law enforcement could use with a warrant.
Technologists denounced key escrows as costly, misguided and risky.
Should the spare keys fall into the wrong hands, private files and messages about bank accounts, illnesses and romances could become public fodder -- as could e-commerce transactions.
"It inevitably tends to render systems built on the technology very vulnerable," said Scott Schnell, a senior vice president at RSA Security Inc, which has produced encryption products since the early 1990s.
Encryption supporters argued that a back door would be pointless -- that key escrow systems are unenforceable and only hurt the law-abiding -- because encryption software without the feature is already freely available worldwide -- released by foreign mathematicians or sneaked out of the US.
Faced with US restrictions, they argue, outlaws would simply turn to unrestricted products.
The Clinton administration relented in September 1999, relaxing export controls over the objections of his attorney general and FBI director. The debate remained dormant until Sept. 13, two days after terrorists believed tied to bin Laden hijacked and slammed airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
That's when Senator Judd Gregg said software manufacturers had an obligation to give law enforcement "the technical capability to get the keys to the basic encryption activity." He did not specify whether it should be voluntary or through legislation.
MILESTONE: The foreign minister called the signing ‘a major step forward in US-Taiwan relations,’ while the Presidential Office said it was a symbol of the nations’ shared values US President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed into law the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, which requires the US Department of State to regularly review and update guidelines governing official US interactions with Taiwan. The new law is an amendment to the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 focused on reviewing guidelines on US interactions with Taiwan. Previously, the state department was required to conduct a one-time review of its guidance governing relations with Taiwan, but under the new bill, the agency must conduct a review “not less than every five years.” It must then submit an updated report based on its findings “not later
The Presidential Office today thanked the US for enacting the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, which requires the US Department of State to regularly review and update guidelines governing official US interactions with Taiwan. The new law, signed by US President Donald Trump yesterday, is an amendment to the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 focused on reviewing guidelines on US interactions with Taiwan. Previously, the department was required to conduct a one-time review of its guidance governing relations with Taiwan, but under the new bill, the agency must conduct such a review "not less than every five years." It must then submit an updated
CROSS-STRAIT COLLABORATION: The new KMT chairwoman expressed interest in meeting the Chinese president from the start, but she’ll have to pay to get in Beijing allegedly agreed to let Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) around the Lunar New Year holiday next year on three conditions, including that the KMT block Taiwan’s arms purchases, a source said yesterday. Cheng has expressed interest in meeting Xi since she won the KMT’s chairmanship election in October. A source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said a consensus on a meeting was allegedly reached after two KMT vice chairmen visited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤) in China last month. Beijing allegedly gave the KMT three conditions it had to
STAYING ALERT: China this week deployed its largest maritime show of force to date in the region, prompting concern in Taipei and Tokyo, which Beijing has brushed off Deterring conflict over Taiwan is a priority, the White House said in its National Security Strategy published yesterday, which also called on Japan and South Korea to increase their defense spending to help protect the first island chain. Taiwan is strategically positioned between Northeast and Southeast Asia, and provides direct access to the second island chain, with one-third of global shipping passing through the South China Sea, the report said. Given the implications for the US economy, along with Taiwan’s dominance in semiconductors, “deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority,” it said. However, the strategy also reiterated
RSS