In a terror-induced climate of heightened electronic vigilance, debate is brewing over whether makers of encryption software should be obliged to provide law enforcement agencies with the keys to open scrambled messages.
Phil Zimmermann and fellow encryption supporters thought they had won the battle two years ago when the US government decided to permit the export of full-strength encryption software without requiring programmers to hand over spare keys.
The Sept. 11 attacks changed the atmosphere, and at least one senator has since called for making keys available. US intelligence says Osama bin Laden's terrorist organization has used e-mail and encryption to communicate.
Currently, agents monitoring e-mail traffic may know two suspected terrorists are talking but can't determine what they are saying. Giving government the keys could help terrorists before they strike, says Gene Poteat, president of the Association of Former Intelligence Officers.
"You have to be quicker on your feet," Poteat said. "You have to have the keys to be able to intercept the messages quicker."
In a Sept. 14 Newsweek poll, 54 percent of Americans said they would support eroding encryption protection to help law enforcement monitor terrorism suspects -- even if it might affect privacy and business practices. Thirty-nine percent were opposed, the rest undecided.
Zimmermann, inventor of the most popular technique for encrypting e-mail, insists the arguments have not changed, even if the circumstances have. He said encryption's potential use by terrorists and criminals was central to the debate that raged through the 1990s.
"Our society collectively decided that strong crypto had more benefits for society than harm," Zimmermann said. "If we try to reverse that ... under incredible emotional pressure, we will make a terrible mistake."
For decades, the government classified encryption as munitions and tried to keep it from the private sector and foreigners. But mathematicians outside government developed encryption independently in the 1980s -- and Zimmermann released his Pretty Good Privacy software in 1991.
The government then tried to block its export and sought to require a ``back door'' accessible to law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Under some "key escrow" systems proposed, users encrypting messages would turn over a copy of their keys to a third party, or software manufacturers would build in a second key that law enforcement could use with a warrant.
Technologists denounced key escrows as costly, misguided and risky.
Should the spare keys fall into the wrong hands, private files and messages about bank accounts, illnesses and romances could become public fodder -- as could e-commerce transactions.
"It inevitably tends to render systems built on the technology very vulnerable," said Scott Schnell, a senior vice president at RSA Security Inc, which has produced encryption products since the early 1990s.
Encryption supporters argued that a back door would be pointless -- that key escrow systems are unenforceable and only hurt the law-abiding -- because encryption software without the feature is already freely available worldwide -- released by foreign mathematicians or sneaked out of the US.
Faced with US restrictions, they argue, outlaws would simply turn to unrestricted products.
The Clinton administration relented in September 1999, relaxing export controls over the objections of his attorney general and FBI director. The debate remained dormant until Sept. 13, two days after terrorists believed tied to bin Laden hijacked and slammed airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
That's when Senator Judd Gregg said software manufacturers had an obligation to give law enforcement "the technical capability to get the keys to the basic encryption activity." He did not specify whether it should be voluntary or through legislation.
UPDATED (3:40pm): A suspected gas explosion at a shopping mall in Taichung this morning has killed four people and injured 20 others, as emergency responders continue to investigate. The explosion occurred on the 12th floor of the Shin Kong Mitsukoshi in Situn District (西屯) at 11:33am. One person was declared dead at the scene, while three people were declared deceased later after receiving emergency treatment. Another 20 people sustained major or minor injuries. The Taichung Fire Bureau said it received a report of the explosion at 11:33am and sent rescuers to respond. The cause of the explosion is still under investigation, it said. The National Fire
ACCOUNTABILITY: The incident, which occured at a Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Department Store in Taichung, was allegedly caused by a gas explosion on the 12th floor Shin Kong Group (新光集團) president Richard Wu (吳昕陽) yesterday said the company would take responsibility for an apparent gas explosion that resulted in four deaths and 26 injuries at Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Zhonggang Store in Taichung yesterday. The Taichung Fire Bureau at 11:33am yesterday received a report saying that people were injured after an explosion at the department store on Section 3 of Taiwan Boulevard in Taichung’s Situn District (西屯). It sent 56 ambulances and 136 paramedics to the site, with the people injured sent to Cheng Ching Hospital’s Chung Kang Branch, Wuri Lin Shin Hospital, Taichung Veterans General Hospital or Chung
ALL-IN-ONE: A company in Tainan and another in New Taipei City offer tours to China during which Taiwanese can apply for a Chinese ID card, the source said The National Immigration Agency and national security authorities have identified at least five companies that help Taiwanese apply for Chinese identification cards while traveling in China, a source said yesterday. The issue has garnered attention in the past few months after YouTuber “Pa Chiung” (八炯) said that there are companies in Taiwan that help Taiwanese apply for Chinese documents. Minister of the Interior Liu Shyh-fang (劉世芳) last week said that three to five public relations firms in southern and northern Taiwan have allegedly assisted Taiwanese in applying for Chinese ID cards and were under investigation for potential contraventions of the Act Governing
‘LAWFUL USE’: The last time a US warship transited the Taiwan Strait was on Oct. 20 last year, and this week’s transit is the first of US President Donald Trump’s second term Two US military vessels transited the Taiwan Strait from Sunday through early yesterday, the Ministry of National Defense said in a statement, the first such mission since US President Donald Trump took office last month. The two vessels sailed south through the Strait, the ministry said, adding that it closely monitored nearby airspace and waters at the time and observed nothing unusual. The ministry did not name the two vessels, but the US Navy identified them as the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Ralph Johnson and the Pathfinder-class survey ship USNS Bowditch. The ships carried out a north-to-south transit from