Queen Elizabeth II was not informed in advance about the 1975 dismissal of Australia’s prime minister by her representative in the country, letters kept secret for decades and released yesterday revealed.
The British monarch’s representative in Australia, then-governor-general John Kerr, sparked a constitutional crisis when he abruptly fired Gough Whitlam, the democratically elected leader of the center-left Labor party.
The High Court in May ruled that more than 200 letters between the queen’s private secretary and Kerr — including many addressing the controversial affair — should be made public.
Photo: EPA-EFE
Although the correspondence show the queen was not told immediately prior to Whitlam’s sacking, they confirm that Kerr had exchanged extensive letters with the palace for months about his powers to oust the prime minister.
Suspicion the palace played a direct role in Whitlam’s ouster has long been cited by Australian Republicans arguing the country should break with the monarchy.
The National Archives of Australia released the 1,200 pages known as the “Palace Letters” yesterday after a four-year court battle to keep them hidden that reportedly cost A$2 million (US$1.4 million).
Historians are now combing through the documents to see if the British government tried to influence events in its former colony and what role the queen, Prince Charles and top royal advisers might have played.
One key extract shows Kerr informed the queen he had fired Whitlam shortly after taking the action on Nov. 11, 1975.
“I should say I decided to take the step I took without informing the Palace in advance because, under the Constitution, the responsibility is mine, and I was of the opinion it was better for Her Majesty not to know in advance, though it is of course my duty to tell her immediately,” he wrote.
The decision capped a protracted political stalemate after the opposition-controlled senate refused to pass the government’s budget, severely weakening Whitlam’s position.
The letters confirm the palace knew Kerr had been considering the options available to him under his constitutional “reserve powers,” which included dismissing Australia’s leader, an action no other governor-general has taken before or since.
“I’m also keeping my mind open as to the constitutional issues,” Kerr wrote to Martin Charteris, the queen’s private secretary, on Sept. 12, 1975.
“If the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition get into a battle in which the Senate has defeated the budget, the Prime Minister refuses to recommend a dissolution, my role will need some careful thought,” he wrote.
Charteris later praised Kerr for his approach, writing a week before the dismissal he was “playing the vice-regal hand with skill and wisdom.”
“The fact you have powers is recognized. But it’s also clear you will only use them in the last resort, and then only for constitutional — and not for political — reasons,” he said.
Jenny Hocking, a professor and biographer of Whitlam who took the case to court, said the political nature of the correspondence was “startling” given the requirement for the head of a constitutional monarchy to remain neutral.
Hocking said the discussion of reserve powers in particular was “scandalous” because its existence in Australia is “highly contested” by legal and political scholars.
After sacking Whitlam, Kerr appointed opposition Liberal leader Malcolm Fraser as interim prime minister, sparking chaos in Canberra and protests on the steps of parliament.
Fraser went on to win a landslide election victory later that year.
Though Australia became independent in 1901, the queen is still head of state.
A referendum on becoming a republic failed in 1999, but republicans hope recent royal scandals could help revive efforts to cut ties with the monarchy.
Labor leader Anthony Albanese described the dismissal of a democratically elected government as “a blight on our character as a nation” that “reinforces the need for us to have an Australian head of state.”
South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol on Tuesday declared martial law in an unannounced late night address broadcast live on YTN television. Yoon said he had no choice but to resort to such a measure in order to safeguard free and constitutional order, saying opposition parties have taken hostage of the parliamentary process to throw the country into a crisis. "I declare martial law to protect the free Republic of Korea from the threat of North Korean communist forces, to eradicate the despicable pro-North Korean anti-state forces that are plundering the freedom and happiness of our people, and to protect the free
A string of rape and assault allegations against the son of Norway’s future queen have plunged the royal family into its “biggest scandal” ever, wrapping up an annus horribilis for the monarchy. The legal troubles surrounding Marius Borg Hoiby, the 27-year-old son born of a relationship before Norwegian Crown Princess Mette-Marit’s marriage to Norwegian Crown Prince Haakon, have dominated the Scandinavian country’s headlines since August. The tall strapping blond with a “bad boy” look — often photographed in tuxedos, slicked back hair, earrings and tattoos — was arrested in Oslo on Aug. 4 suspected of assaulting his girlfriend the previous night. A photograph
‘GOOD POLITICS’: He is a ‘pragmatic radical’ and has moderated his rhetoric since the height of his radicalism in 2014, a lecturer in contemporary Islam said Abu Mohammed al-Jolani is the leader of the Islamist alliance that spearheaded an offensive that rebels say brought down Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and ended five decades of Baath Party rule in Syria. Al-Jolani heads Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which is rooted in Syria’s branch of al-Qaeda. He is a former extremist who adopted a more moderate posture in order to achieve his goals. Yesterday, as the rebels entered Damascus, he ordered all military forces in the capital not to approach public institutions. Last week, he said the objective of his offensive, which saw city after city fall from government control, was to
The US deployed a reconnaissance aircraft while Japan and the Philippines sent navy ships in a joint patrol in the disputed South China Sea yesterday, two days after the allied forces condemned actions by China Coast Guard vessels against Philippine patrol ships. The US Indo-Pacific Command said the joint patrol was conducted in the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone by allies and partners to “uphold the right to freedom of navigation and overflight “ and “other lawful uses of the sea and international airspace.” Those phrases are used by the US, Japan and the Philippines to oppose China’s increasingly aggressive actions in the
RSS