Russian President Vladimir Putin’s allies on Wednesday backed reforms that could allow him to stay in the Kremlin until 2036, but critics accused him of seeking to usurp power and called for protests.
A day after voting for a package of Putin-backed constitutional amendments — including a last-minute addition to “reset” his presidential terms — the lower Russian State Duma gave its final approval on Wednesday.
The upper Russian Federation Council quickly followed suit, voting overwhelmingly a few hours later in favor of the reforms.
Photo: AP
The votes followed months of speculation about Putin’s political future after he shocked the Russian establishment by announcing constitutional reforms in January.
In a speech before the upper chamber’s vote, Federation Council Chairwoman Valentina Matviyenko said that Putin “must have the right” to compete for the presidency again after his current term expires in 2024.
“He raised Russia from its knees,” she said, and “is considered one of the world’s great leaders.”
Other Kremlin allies lined up to praise the amendments, saying that Putin was the kind of stabilizing figure that Russia needs.
“A president who is barred from being elected for another term cannot be a strong figure,” said Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin, a loyal Putin ally.
Limiting his ability to run would be “a destabilizing factor” for Russia, he added.
State Duma Chairman Vyacheslav Volodin said that the constitutional changes would “strengthen our country” and pave the way for Russia’s future.
The amendments must now be approved by two-thirds of Russian regional legislatures — which is all but certain — before being put to a public vote on April 22.
The package Putin announced in January included a slew of political and social reforms.
On Tuesday, an addition was made to restart the clock on Putin’s time in the Kremlin once the amendments are adopted.
Putin, 67, backed the addition, although he said that it would have to be approved by the Russian Constitutional Court.
First elected in 2000, Putin is serving a second consecutive six-year term, so he would not have the right to run again.
The reset would let him run again in 2024 and 2030, potentially allowing Putin to rule longer than Soviet leader Joseph Stalin.
The proposal sparked a fierce backlash from critics, including opposition leader Alexei Navalny, who accused Putin of seeking to become “president for life.”
Dozens of demonstrators assembled near the Kremlin after Tuesday’s vote to voice their frustration.
“Putin until 2036, it’s just unthinkable,” said Ilya Azar, a journalist and activist who organized the protest.
Russia’s opposition has called for mass demonstrations against the proposals, including one in Moscow today, despite a ban by local authorities on gatherings of more than 5,000 people due to COVID-19 fears.
An open letter signed by more than 20 opposition figures called on Russians to reject Putin’s attempt to “usurp power.”
In the letter published by Novaya Gazeta, they said that the reforms were “nothing more than a gross violation” of the law aimed at propping up Russia’s “deeply corrupt system.”
On the streets of Moscow on Wednesday, some residents welcomed the prospect of Putin staying on, while others said that there was no point in opposing the president.
“I don’t know who would be a better alternative candidate. Under his rule, nothing bad has happened,” 34-year-old Natalia Muratova said. “Let him stay and rule.”
Elena Volkova, a 62-year-old retiree, said that Putin had made up his mind and the courts would do as he asked.
“What can we do if Putin has decided something?” she asked.
Still, political analyst Alexei Makarkin said that the proposals could trigger a wave of anti-government action, like in 2011 and 2012, when tens of thousands took to the streets against Putin’s return to the Kremlin following four years as prime minister.
“Resetting Putin’s term gives the opposition an additional emotional boost and argument,” said Makarkin, an expert with the Moscow-based Center for Political Technologies.
“We do not know when this trigger will be pulled,” he said.
Showcasing phallus-shaped portable shrines and pink penis candies, Japan’s annual fertility festival yesterday teemed with tourists, couples and families elated by its open display of sex. The spring Kanamara Matsuri near Tokyo features colorfully dressed worshipers carrying a trio of giant phallic-shaped objects as they parade through the street with glee. The festival, as legend has it, honors a local blacksmith in the Edo Period (1603-1868) who forged an iron dildo to break the teeth of a sharp-toothed demon inhabiting a woman’s vagina that had been castrating young men on their wedding nights. A 1m black steel phallus sits in the courtyard of
JAN. 1 CLAUSE: As military service is voluntary, applications for permission to stay abroad for over three months for men up to age 45 must, in principle, be granted A little-noticed clause in sweeping changes to Germany’s military service policy has triggered an uproar after it emerged that the law requires men aged up to 45 to get permission from the armed forces before any significant stay abroad, even in peacetime. The legislation, which went into effect on Jan. 1 aims to bolster the military and demands all 18-year-old men fill out a questionnaire to gauge their suitability to serve in the armed forces, but stops short of conscription. If the “modernized” model fails to pull in enough recruits, parliament will be compelled to discuss the reintroduction of compulsory service, German
Filipino farmers like Romeo Wagayan have been left with little choice but to let their vegetables rot in the field rather than sell them at a loss, as rising oil prices linked to the Iran war drive up the cost of harvesting, labor and transport. “There’s nothing we can do,” said Wagayan, a 57-year old vegetable farmer in the northern Philippine province of Benguet. “If we harvest it, our losses only increase because of labor, transportation and packing costs. We don’t earn anything from it. That’s why we decided not to harvest at all,” he said. Soaring costs caused by the Middle East
For two decades, researchers observed members of the Ngogo chimpanzee group of Kibale National Park in Uganda spend their days eating fruits and leaves, resting, traveling and grooming in their tropical rainforest abode, but this stable community then fractured and descended into years of deadly violence. The researchers are now describing the first clearly documented example of a group of wild chimpanzees splitting into two separate factions, with one launching a series of coordinated attacks against the other. Adult males and infants were targeted, with 28 deaths. “Biting, pounding the victim with their hands, dragging them, kicking them — mostly adult males,
RSS