London’s Gatwick Airport yesterday reopened for flights while cautioning that it was still on the hunt for illegal drones that buzzed the hub for almost 24 hours, disrupting travel for 120,000 people.
With many airplanes and staff still out of position, Gatwick said that it would struggle to operate a normal timetable, let alone clear a backlog of passengers who found themselves grounded by the mystery incursions.
There was no guarantee that the devices were gone, it added.
“Obviously there is a possibility that the drones could return,” a Gatwick spokeswoman said by telephone, adding that management was “suitably content in working with the police and other experts to reopen.”
Customers should check with their airline before traveling to their terminal, the airport said.
Sussex Police, which has been dealing with the incident along with specialists from Britain’s armed forces, said that there were almost 50 drone sightings at the airport between 9:07pm on Wednesday and 4:25pm on Thursday, although some might have been duplicates.
A statement on the force’s Web site said that “as yet, the drone has not been identified.”
It was not clear how long it would take to restore order at Gatwick after the worst disruption at a London airport since blizzards closed Heathrow Airport in 2013. The hub has only one runway, which is already the world’s busiest, giving it little scope to cram in more flights even if the drones stay away.
EasyJet, the airport’s biggest carrier, was among those to caution that it expected further disruption.
British authorities portrayed the intrusion as a deliberate invasion of Gatwick’s airspace at one of the busiest travel periods of the year. A single pair of drones got the better of a multifront operation supported by the military for the best part of two days.
A daylight search backed by helicopters failed to locate the devices or their operator.
British Secretary of State for Defence Gavin Williamson sent in the military and the British Ministry of Defence said that specialist equipment would be deployed.
To ease the backlog of flights, the British Department for Transport temporarily lifted a ban on night operations at other UK airports.
The criminal intrusions involving two drones were “highly targeted” and designed to deliver maximum disruption in the days before Christmas, Gatwick Airport CEO Stewart Wingate said.
The actions were clearly intentional, although most likely not terror related, police said.
More than 50 incoming airplanes were diverted to other hubs in Britain and mainland Europe on Wednesday night, with Gatwick reopened after six hours, only to shut again 45 minutes later amid further sightings.
As well as the biggest base for EasyJet, Gatwick is also a focus for long-haul leisure flights at British Airways. Hundreds of operations have been disrupted because of the closure.
Ryanair said that it would shift yesterday’s flights at Gatwick to London Stansted Airport.
Airlines such as Cathay Pacific and Norwegian Air Shuttle have diverted to other airfields.
Uncrewed aerial vehicles and laser pointers have become an increasing threat for aircraft, prompting regulators to come up with new rules against operating the devices near airfields.
Dubai International Airport in 2016 shut down temporarily after suspected drone activity, while airspace around Wellington was closed for 30 minutes this year when a craft was spotted flying close to the runway.
Grupo Aeromexico last week said that it was investigating whether a drone collided with a Boeing 737 as the airplane approached Tijuana, Mexico. The jet sustained damage to its nose, but landed safely.
While governments bar drones from paths reserved for airliners, with Britain outlawing flights above 120m or within 1km of an airport boundary, the millions of small consumer devices that have been purchased around the world cannot be tracked on radar, making it difficult to enforce the rules.
In addition, many users do not know the restrictions — or do not follow them.
TARNISHED LEGACY: Woodrow Wilson served as the university’s president before becoming the US’ 28th leader, but his racism was ‘significant and consequential’ Princeton University is removing former US president Woodrow Wilson’s name from its public policy school and one of its residential colleges after trustees concluded that the 28th president’s “racist thinking and policies” made him “an inappropriate namesake.” The Ivy League school’s trustees made the decision on Friday, according to a statement on Saturday. It comes at a time of widespread rethinking of the US’ racial legacy. The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, energized by a series of high-profile deaths of black Americans, has resulted in the removal of Confederate monuments, flags and symbols of racism across the US. Deleting Wilson’s name at Princeton
‘FULLY ENCLOSED’: Residents of Anxin County would be confined to their homes and would only be allowed out once a day to buy necessities such as food and medicine China yesterday imposed a strict lockdown on nearly half a million people near the capital to contain a fresh COVID-19 cluster as authorities warned the outbreak was still “severe and complicated.” After China largely brought the virus under control, hundreds have been infected in Beijing and cases have emerged in Hebei Province. Health officials said that Anxin County — about 150km from Beijing — would be “fully enclosed and controlled,” the same strict measures imposed at the height of the pandemic in the city of Wuhan earlier this year. Only one person from each family would be allowed to go out once a
Japan said it opposed changes to the G7 nations as it pushed back against a reform plan by US President Donald Trump that would have rival South Korea this year join in an expanded meeting. Tokyo has told the US it stands against South Korea’s participation on the grounds of differences in policy on China and North Korea, Kyodo News reported this weekend, citing more than one source related to Japanese and US diplomacy. Japan also wants to maintain its status as the only Asian country in the group, the news agency added. Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga yesterday told reporters that
The onset of summer has sparked a rise in incidents of “mask rage” in South Korea as more hot and bothered commuters either refuse to wear face coverings or leave parts of their faces exposed. In South Korea, Japan and other countries in East Asia, widespread mask wearing has been cited as one possible explanation for the region’s relative success in bringing the COVID-19 pandemic under control. South Korea, one of the first countries outside China to be affected by the virus, flattened the coronavirus curve in April, although it is now struggling with dozens of daily cases, mainly in and around