An 11th-hour deal clinched by German Chancellor Angela Merkel to rescue her fragile government by limiting migrant arrivals immediately ran into European resistance yesterday, with neighboring Austria vowing to “protect” its borders.
In high-stakes crisis talks overnight, Merkel put to rest for now a dangerous row with a longtime rival, German Minister of the Interior Horst Seehofer, that had threatened the survival of her shaky 100-day-old coalition.
A relieved-looking Merkel, who has been in power since 2005, emerged from the late-night negotiations hailing a “very good compromise” that would “control” new arrivals of migrants and asylum seekers while upholding EU cooperation and values.
However, criticism from Vienna and her junior coalition partner, the Social Democratic Party (SPD), threatened to throw a spanner in the works just as Germany hoped to emerge from a crippling weeks-long political standstill.
If the agreement reached on Monday evening is approved by the German government as a whole, “we will be obliged to take measures to avoid disadvantages for Austria and its people,” the Austrian government said in a statement.
It added it would be “ready to take measures to protect our southern borders in particular,” those with Italy and Slovenia.
The remarks raised the specter of a domino effect in Europe, with member states taking increasingly restrictive measures to shut out refugees.
Under the pact both sides hailed as a victory, Merkel and Seehofer agreed to tighten border controls and set up closed “transit centers” to allow the speedy processing of asylum seekers and the repatriation of those who are rejected.
Those who are rejected would either be sent back to EU countries that previously registered them or, in case arrival countries reject this — likely including frontline state Italy — be sent back to Austria, pending a now questionable agreement with Vienna.
Christian Social Union General Secretary Markus Blume called the hardening policy proposal the last building block “in a turnaround on asylum policy” after a mass influx brought more than 1 million migrants and refugees.
However, doubts were voiced quickly by other parties and groups, accusing Merkel of bidding a final farewell to her welcoming stance toward asylum seekers taken at the height of the influx in 2015.
Refugee support group Pro Asyl slammed what it labeled “detention centers in no-man’s land” and charged that German power politics were being played out “on the backs of those in need of protection.”
Annalena Baerbock of the opposition Greens party spoke of “internment camps,” accusing the conservatives of “bidding goodbye to our country’s moral compass.”
She urged the SPD to reject the plan.
SPD leader Andrea Nahles said after a party meeting yesterday that it still had “has significant questions” on the deal.
The Social Democrats are to hold joint party meeting with the CDU/CSU bloc at 4pm yesterday.
“We will take the time we need to take a decision,” she said.
One of the SPD’s migration experts, Aziz Bozkurt, was withering, charging that the proposed holding centers would be “impractical and fully on track with the AfD” — the far-right Alternative for Germany party that has railed most loudly against immigrants.
The deal announced overnight ended Merkel’s worst crisis after she faced down an unprecedented mutiny by Seehofer, head of her party’s traditional allies the CSU.
A failure to defuse the open conflict would have threatened an end to their 70-year party alliance, forcing Merkel to find new partners or call fresh elections.
South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol on Tuesday declared martial law in an unannounced late night address broadcast live on YTN television. Yoon said he had no choice but to resort to such a measure in order to safeguard free and constitutional order, saying opposition parties have taken hostage of the parliamentary process to throw the country into a crisis. "I declare martial law to protect the free Republic of Korea from the threat of North Korean communist forces, to eradicate the despicable pro-North Korean anti-state forces that are plundering the freedom and happiness of our people, and to protect the free
A string of rape and assault allegations against the son of Norway’s future queen have plunged the royal family into its “biggest scandal” ever, wrapping up an annus horribilis for the monarchy. The legal troubles surrounding Marius Borg Hoiby, the 27-year-old son born of a relationship before Norwegian Crown Princess Mette-Marit’s marriage to Norwegian Crown Prince Haakon, have dominated the Scandinavian country’s headlines since August. The tall strapping blond with a “bad boy” look — often photographed in tuxedos, slicked back hair, earrings and tattoos — was arrested in Oslo on Aug. 4 suspected of assaulting his girlfriend the previous night. A photograph
The US deployed a reconnaissance aircraft while Japan and the Philippines sent navy ships in a joint patrol in the disputed South China Sea yesterday, two days after the allied forces condemned actions by China Coast Guard vessels against Philippine patrol ships. The US Indo-Pacific Command said the joint patrol was conducted in the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone by allies and partners to “uphold the right to freedom of navigation and overflight “ and “other lawful uses of the sea and international airspace.” Those phrases are used by the US, Japan and the Philippines to oppose China’s increasingly aggressive actions in the
‘GOOD POLITICS’: He is a ‘pragmatic radical’ and has moderated his rhetoric since the height of his radicalism in 2014, a lecturer in contemporary Islam said Abu Mohammed al-Jolani is the leader of the Islamist alliance that spearheaded an offensive that rebels say brought down Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and ended five decades of Baath Party rule in Syria. Al-Jolani heads Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which is rooted in Syria’s branch of al-Qaeda. He is a former extremist who adopted a more moderate posture in order to achieve his goals. Yesterday, as the rebels entered Damascus, he ordered all military forces in the capital not to approach public institutions. Last week, he said the objective of his offensive, which saw city after city fall from government control, was to