On June 20, Mohammed bin Nayef, a powerful figure in Saudi Arabia’s security apparatus for the past two decades and the next in line to the throne, was summoned to meet Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz on the fourth floor of the royal palace in Mecca.
There, according to a source close to bin Nayef, the king ordered him to step aside in favor of the king’s favorite son, Mohammed bin Salman.
The reason: An addiction to painkilling drugs was clouding bin Nayef’s judgment.
“The king came to meet bin Nayef and they were alone in the room. He told him: ‘I want you to step down, you didn’t listen to the advice to get treatment for your addiction, which dangerously affects your decisions,’” the source said.
The new details about the extraordinary meeting between the Saudi king and bin Nayef that touched off the de facto palace coup help to explain the events that are reshaping the leadership of the world’s biggest oil exporting nation.
A senior Saudi official said the account was totally “unfounded and untrue in addition to being nonsense.”
“The story depicted here is a complete fantasy worthy of Hollywood,” the official said in a statement.
The official said bin Nayef had been removed in the national interest and had not experienced any “pressure or disrespect.”
However, sources with knowledge of the situation said that the Saudi king was determined to elevate his son to be heir to the throne and used bin Nayef’s drug problem as a pretext to push him aside.
Three royal insiders, four Arab officials with links to the ruling house of Al Saud and diplomats in the region told reporters that bin Nayef was surprised to be ordered to step aside.
The sources said bin Nayef did not expect to be usurped by the often impulsive bin Salman, who bin Nayef considered to have made a number of policy blunders, such as his handling of the Yemen conflict and cutting financial benefits to civil servants.
The high-stakes power grab has placed sweeping powers in the hands of the 32-year-old bin Salman and appears designed to speed his accession to the throne.
Should he get the job, the young prince would preside over a kingdom facing tough times from depressed oil prices, the conflict in Yemen, rivalry with an emboldened Iran and a major diplomatic crisis in the Persian Gulf.
In the hours that followed the meeting in which bin Nayef was dismissed, the House of Al Saud’s Allegiance Council, comprising the ruling family’s senior members, were informed of a letter written in the name of the king.
Drafted by palace advisers to bin Salman, it said bin Nayef had a medical condition — drug addiction — and “we have been trying for more than two years to persuade him to seek treatment, but to no avail.”
“Because of this dangerous situation we see that he should be relieved of his position and that Mohammed bin Salman be appointed in his place,” the Saudi source close to bin Nayef quoted excerpts of the letter as saying.
The letter was read over the telephone to members of the council, while bin Nayef was kept isolated in a room all night, his mobile phone removed and cut off from contact with his aides.
Envoys were sent to council members to get their signatures. All but three of 34 signed. The coup had worked.
Calls by council members who backed bin Nayef’s removal were recorded and played to him by a palace adviser to demonstrate the strength of the forces against him and to discourage any urge the 57-year-old crown prince might have to resist.
At dawn bin Nayef gave up. He told a palace adviser that he was ready to see the king. The meeting was short. Bin Nayef agreed to step down and signed a document to that effect.
With bin Salman’s sudden ascent, there is speculation among diplomats and Saudi and Arab officials that King Salman is poised to abdicate in favor of his son.
Quoting a witness at the palace, one source said King Salman this month pre-recorded a statement in which he announces the transfer of the throne to his son.
The announcement could be broadcast at any time, perhaps as soon as September, the source said.
FOX HUNT: To suppress dissent, Chinese living abroad that Xi Jinping sees as threats are told to either return to China or commit suicide, Christopher Wray said Chinese agents have been pursuing hundreds of Chinese nationals living in the US in an effort to force their return, as part of a global campaign against the country’s diaspora, known as Operation Fox Hunt, FBI Director Christopher Wray said on Tuesday. In a speech about the security threat posed by China, during which he said Beijing’s counterintelligence work was the “greatest long-term threat to our nation’s information and intellectual property, and to our economic vitality,” Wray gave the example of one Fox Hunt target who was given a choice of going back to China or killing themselves. Fox Hunt was launched
‘WOULD NOT COMPLY’: The company’s user data are kept in Singapore and it would not turn the data over to Beijing even if asked, TikTok chief executive Kevin Mayer said Social media app TikTok has distanced itself from Beijing after India banned 59 Chinese apps in the country, according to a correspondence seen by Reuters. In a letter to the Indian government dated on Sunday last week and seen by Reuters on Friday, TikTok chief executive Kevin Mayer said the Chinese government has never requested user data, nor would the company turn it over if asked. TikTok, which is not available in China, is owned by China’s ByteDance, but has sought to distance itself from its Chinese roots to appeal to a global audience. Along with 58 other Chinese apps, including Tencent
INTERNET CURBS: People are rushing to erase their digital footprints after police given powers over online activity, although it might take years for the full effect to be felt At midnight on Tuesday, the Great Firewall of China, the vast apparatus that limits the country’s Internet, appeared to descend on Hong Kong. Unveiling expanded police powers as part of contentious new national security legislation, the Hong Kong government enabled police to censor online speech, and force Internet service providers to hand over user information and shut down platforms. Many residents, already anxious since the legislation took effect last week, rushed to erase their digital footprint of any signs of dissent or support for the past year of protests. Hong Kong Legislator Charles Mok (莫乃光), a pro-democracy member of the Legislative
‘FIGHT FOR FREEDOM’: Hong Kongers will never bow to Beijing, the advocate said, while the US’ envoy to the territory called China’s new security law a ‘tragedy’ The world must stand in solidarity with Hong Kongers after Beijing imposed sweeping national security legislation on the semi-autonomous territory, advocate Joshua Wong (黃之鋒) said yesterday, vowing to continue campaigning for democracy. Wong, one of the territory’s most prominent young advocates and a figure loathed by Beijing, was speaking outside a court where he and fellow advocates are being prosecuted for involvement in last year’s pro-democracy protests. China last week enacted sweeping security legislation for the restless territory, banning acts of subversion, secession, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces. The legislation has sent a wave of fear through the territory, and criminalized dissenting