New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has made no secret of his disdain for the news media, so when legislation that could hurt the state’s newspapers appeared suddenly this week, fingers pointed at the governor’s office.
Democratic lawmakers and newspaper industry officials said they suspected that Christie was pressing for quick passage of a bill that would eliminate the requirement for public notices to be printed. The change could cost the state’s already-strapped newspapers millions of US dollars in advertising revenue.
“It’s a broadside against a free press, nothing more, nothing less,” Democratic New Jersey Assemblyman John Wisniewski said. “I think it’s revenge.”
Wisniewski, who is campaigning to succeed Christie in 2018, said he had heard from fellow lawmakers in Trenton that the bill came from the governor’s office.
It was scheduled for hearings in the New Jersey legislature yesterday, indicating that it has the support of New Jersey Senate President Stephen Sweeney and New Jersey General Assembly Speaker Vincent Prieto, both Democrats.
Christie spokesman Brian Murray declined to comment on how the idea for the bill came up or why the governor supported it.
However, he provided an e-mail that said: “Taxpayers and businesses” paid more than US$80 million per year to publish legal notices.
The assembly version of the bill is sponsored by Prieto and Republican leader of the assembly Jon Bramnick.
After the hearings, the bill could come up for a vote on Monday, the last day of the session this year.
The proposed change also has support from the New Jersey State League of Municipalities, although that group did not spur the legislature to act, assistant executive director Michael Cerra said.
Cerra said local and county governments could save money by posting notices online instead of in newspapers.
“We’ve always supported it,” Cerra said. “Local officials have continually made this point to their elected representatives.”
However, the league had not called for “this particular bill at this particular time,” he added.
When a similar bill was proposed in 2010, the New Jersey Office of Legislative Services said the financial impact was unclear. It estimated that government agencies spent US$8 million per year on public notices.
Cerra said the bill would give governments permission to stop placing notices in newspapers, but he said the shift would probably be gradual, with some towns opting to make it sooner than others.
Alluding to newspapers’ declining fortunes, he said: “I do think there’s an inevitability to this, a natural progression.”
He likened the current debate to one from decades ago over changing a requirement that towns publish the full text of proposed ordinances in newspapers. Over the objection of the New Jersey Press Association, the law was changed to allow for publication of just an ordinance’s title, which saved towns a lot of money, he said.
The proposal set off impassioned responses from New Jersey’s biggest newspapers. Both the Newark-based Star-Ledger and the Asbury Park Press published op-eds denouncing the proposal as vengeful.
“We’re really concerned,” said Hollis Towns, executive editor of the Press, one of seven New Jersey newspapers owned by Gannett. “The impact will be devastating. It would entail potentially major losses. And it would mean that local politicians would no longer be required to post legal notices in a place where the majority of the public could see them.”
RARE EVENT: While some cultures have a negative view of eclipses, others see them as a chance to show how people can work together, a scientist said Stargazers across a swathe of the world marveled at a dramatic red “Blood Moon” during a rare total lunar eclipse in the early hours of yesterday morning. The celestial spectacle was visible in the Americas and Pacific and Atlantic oceans, as well as in the westernmost parts of Europe and Africa. The phenomenon happens when the sun, Earth and moon line up, causing our planet to cast a giant shadow across its satellite. But as the Earth’s shadow crept across the moon, it did not entirely blot out its white glow — instead the moon glowed a reddish color. This is because the
DEBT BREAK: Friedrich Merz has vowed to do ‘whatever it takes’ to free up more money for defense and infrastructure at a time of growing geopolitical uncertainty Germany’s likely next leader Friedrich Merz was set yesterday to defend his unprecedented plans to massively ramp up defense and infrastructure spending in the Bundestag as lawmakers begin debating the proposals. Merz unveiled the plans last week, vowing his center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU)/Christian Social Union (CSU) bloc and the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) — in talks to form a coalition after last month’s elections — would quickly push them through before the end of the current legislature. Fraying Europe-US ties under US President Donald Trump have fueled calls for Germany, long dependent on the US security umbrella, to quickly
Romania’s electoral commission on Saturday excluded a second far-right hopeful, Diana Sosoaca, from May’s presidential election, amid rising tension in the run-up to the May rerun of the poll. Earlier this month, Romania’s Central Electoral Bureau barred Calin Georgescu, an independent who was polling at about 40 percent ahead of the rerun election. Georgescu, a fierce EU and NATO critic, shot to prominence in November last year when he unexpectedly topped a first round of presidential voting. However, Romania’s constitutional court annulled the election after claims of Russian interference and a “massive” social media promotion in his favor. On Saturday, an electoral commission statement
Chinese authorities increased pressure on CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd over its plan to sell its Panama ports stake by sharing a second newspaper commentary attacking the deal. The Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office on Saturday reposted a commentary originally published in Ta Kung Pao, saying the planned sale of the ports by the Hong Kong company had triggered deep concerns among Chinese people and questioned whether the deal was harming China and aiding evil. “Why were so many important ports transferred to ill-intentioned US forces so easily? What kind of political calculations are hidden in the so-called commercial behavior on the