US President Barack Obama is poised to veto legislation exposing Saudi Arabia to court action over the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, stepping in to defend legal precedent and an awkward ally, but inviting election-time opprobrium.
White House officials say Obama is likely to reject the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act by a veto deadline today, after just more than a week of deliberation.
The administration is worried the bill — passed unanimously by Congress — would undermine state immunity, setting a dangerous legal precedent.
Obama’s aides tried and failed to have the legislation substantially revised, and now face the prospect of Republicans and Democrats joining forces to override the presidential veto, a relatively rare rebuke of White House power.
Families of victims have campaigned for the law — convinced that the Saudi government had a hand in the attacks that killed almost 3,000 people.
Fifteen of the 19 hijackers were Saudi citizens, but no link to the government has been proven. The Saudi government denies any links to the plotters.
“Fifteen years is already far too long to be asked to wait for accountability for the deaths and injuries suffered in the 9/11 attacks,” widow Terry Strada said.
Strada gave birth days before her husband, Tom, a bond broker at Cantor Fitzgerald, was killed in World Trade Center Tower One.
Behind the scenes, Riyadh has been lobbying furiously for the bill to be scrapped.
A senior Saudi Prince reportedly threatened to pull billions of US dollars out of US assets if it becomes law, but Saudi officials now distance themselves from that claim.
The US-Saudi relationship had already been strained by Obama’s engagement with Iran and the July release of a secret report on Saudi’s involvement in the attacks.
Declassified documents have shown US intelligence had multiple suspicions about links between the Saudi government and the attackers.
“While in the United States, some of the 9/11 hijackers were in contact with, and received support or assistance from, individuals who may be connected to the Saudi government,” a finding read.
This would be the 12th veto of Obama’s eight-year presidency and one of his most politically fraught.
Congressional insiders insist they have the votes needed to override, in what would be a significant blow for the White House in the final months of Obama’s presidency.
The White House is holding out vague hope that convoluted Congressional rules could delay the override until after the Nov. 8 election, when the politics might be less toxic and minds might be changed.
Until then, Republicans will certainly use the veto to cast Obama as putting monarchs in Riyadh before US terror victims.
Republican US presidential candidate Donald Trump has already tried to paint Obama and his would-be successor, Democratic US presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton, as week on terrorism.
He has vowed to challenge Clinton in his home state of New York, where he lags by 17 points, but where the bill has become a major political issue and could have an impact on Congressional and state races.
Democrats have been quick to insulate themselves from criticism by backing the bill, not least cosponsor New York Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer.
Meanwhile, Clinton has voiced support for congressional efforts “to secure the ability of 9/11 families and other victims of terror to hold accountable those responsible,” campaign spokesman Jesse Lehrich said.
The White House is getting some backing from diplomatic allies who share concerns about the US becoming a venue for citizens to sue governments.
In a diplomatic protest note obtained by reporters, the EU warned the rules would be “in conflict with fundamental principles of international law.”
“State immunity is a central pillar of the international legal order,” the demarche said, adding that other countries could take “reciprocal action.”
In a letter to lawmakers, also seen by reporters, former US secretary of defense William Cohen, former CIA boss Michael Morell and Stephen Hadley, former US president George W. Bush’s national security advisor, were among a group of high-profile security figures to warn the legislation would hurt US interests.
“Our troops, our diplomats and all US government personnel working overseas could very well find themselves subject to lawsuits in other countries,” they said.
“Our national security interests, our capacity to fight terrorism and our leadership role in the world would be put in serious jeopardy,” they added.
DIALOGUE: US president-elect Donald Trump on his Truth Social platform confirmed that he had spoken with Xi, saying ‘the call was a very good one’ for the US and China US president-elect Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) discussed Taiwan, trade, fentanyl and TikTok in a phone call on Friday, just days before Trump heads back to the White House with vows to impose tariffs and other measures on the US’ biggest rival. Despite that, Xi congratulated Trump on his second term and pushed for improved ties, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said. The call came the same day that the US Supreme Court backed a law banning TikTok unless it is sold by its China-based parent company. “We both attach great importance to interaction, hope for
‘GREAT OPPRTUNITY’: The Paraguayan president made the remarks following Donald Trump’s tapping of several figures with deep Latin America expertise for his Cabinet Paraguay President Santiago Pena called US president-elect Donald Trump’s incoming foreign policy team a “dream come true” as his nation stands to become more relevant in the next US administration. “It’s a great opportunity for us to advance very, very fast in the bilateral agenda on trade, security, rule of law and make Paraguay a much closer ally” to the US, Pena said in an interview in Washington ahead of Trump’s inauguration today. “One of the biggest challenges for Paraguay was that image of an island surrounded by land, a country that was isolated and not many people know about it,”
‘FIGHT TO THE END’: Attacking a court is ‘unprecedented’ in South Korea and those involved would likely face jail time, a South Korean political pundit said Supporters of impeached South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol yesterday stormed a Seoul court after a judge extended the impeached leader’s detention over his ill-fated attempt to impose martial law. Tens of thousands of people had gathered outside the Seoul Western District Court on Saturday in a show of support for Yoon, who became South Korea’s first sitting head of state to be arrested in a dawn raid last week. After the court extended his detention on Saturday, the president’s supporters smashed windows and doors as they rushed inside the building. Hundreds of police officers charged into the court, arresting dozens and denouncing an
CYBERSCAM: Anne, an interior decorator with mental health problems, spent a year and a half believing she was communicating with Brad Pitt and lost US$855,259 A French woman who revealed on TV how she had lost her life savings to scammers posing as Brad Pitt has faced a wave of online harassment and mockery, leading the interview to be withdrawn on Tuesday. The woman, named as Anne, told the Seven to Eight program on the TF1 channel how she had believed she was in a romantic relationship with the Hollywood star, leading her to divorce her husband and transfer 830,000 euros (US$855,259). The scammers used fake social media and WhatsApp accounts, as well as artificial intelligence image-creating technology to send Anne selfies and other messages