Every two years or so, computer speed and memory capacity doubles — a head-spinning pace that experts say could see machines become smarter than humans within decades.
This week, one test of how far artificial intelligence (AI) has come is to happen in Seoul — a five-day battle between man and machine for supremacy in the 3,000-year-old Chinese board game go.
Said to be the most complex game ever designed, with an incomputable number of move options, go requires human-like “intuition” to prevail.
“If the machine wins, it will be an important symbolic moment,” AI expert Jean-Gabriel Ganascia of the Pierre and Marie Curie University in Paris said. “Until now, the game of go has been problematic for computers as there are too many possible moves to develop an all-encompassing database of possibilities, as for chess.”
Go reputedly has more possible board configurations than there are atoms in the universe.
This fiendish complexity meant that mastery of the game by a computer was at least a decade away — or so it was thought.
The assumption began to crack when, in October last year, Google’s AlphaGo program beat Europe’s human champion, Fan Hui (樊麾).
Google has now upped the stakes and will put its machine through the ultimate wringer in a marathon match today against South Korean Lee Se-dol, who has held the world crown for a decade.
Game-playing is a crucial measure of AI progress — it shows that a machine can execute a certain “intellectual” task better than the humans who created it.
Key moments included IBM’s Deep Blue defeating chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov in 1997 and the Watson supercomputer outwitting humans in the TV quiz show Jeopardy in 2011, but AlphaGo is different.
It is partly self-taught — having played millions of games against itself after initial programming to hone its tactics through trial and error.
“AlphaGo is really more interesting than either Deep Blue or Watson, because the algorithms it uses are potentially more general-purpose,” said Nick Bostrom of Oxford University’s Future of Humanity Institute.
Creating “general” or multipurpose, rather than “narrow,” task-specific intelligence, is the ultimate goal in AI — something resembling human reasoning based on a variety of inputs.
“General intelligence is about being good at achieving one’s goals when solving problems that are new and perhaps not well-defined,” Bostrom’s colleague, Anders Sandberg, said. “So if the machine can do new things when needed, then it has ‘true’ intelligence.”
In the case of go, Google developers realized a more “human-like” approach would win over brute computing power.
To this end, AlphaGo uses two sets of “deep neural networks” containing millions of connections similar to neurons in the brain. It is able to predict a winner from each move, reducing the search base to manageable levels — something co-creator David Silver has described as “more akin to imagination.”
So what if we manage to build a truly smart machine?
For some, it means a world in which robots take care of our sick, fly and drive us around safely, stock our fridges, plan our holidays and do hazardous jobs humans should not or will not do. For others, it evokes apocalyptic images in which hostile machines are in charge.
Physicist Stephen Hawking is among the leading voices of caution.
“Computers are likely to overtake humans in intelligence at some point in the next 100 years,” Hawking told a conference of global thinkers in May last year.
“One can imagine such technology outsmarting financial markets, out-inventing human researchers, out-manipulating human leaders and potentially subduing us with weapons we cannot even understand,” he warned in a video posted online.
For Sandberg, it will be up to us to teach intelligent computers certain “values.”
“When AI becomes comparable to human intelligence in important areas, then not only human intentions matter, but also what values are built into the system,” he said.
There are more than 10 million robots in the world today — everything from rescuers and surgical assistants, home-cleaners, route-finders, lawnmowers and factory workers, even pets — and while some machines might beat us at checkers or maths, some experts think robots might never rival humans in some aspects of “true” intelligence.
Things like “common sense” or humor might never be reproducible, Ganascia said.
“We can imagine that in the future, ever more tasks will be executed by machines better than by humans, but that does not mean that machines will be able to automate everything that our cognitive faculties allow us to do,” Ganascia said.
“In my view, this is a limitation that keeps the scientific discipline of AI in check,” he said.
FOX HUNT: To suppress dissent, Chinese living abroad that Xi Jinping sees as threats are told to either return to China or commit suicide, Christopher Wray said Chinese agents have been pursuing hundreds of Chinese nationals living in the US in an effort to force their return, as part of a global campaign against the country’s diaspora, known as Operation Fox Hunt, FBI Director Christopher Wray said on Tuesday. In a speech about the security threat posed by China, during which he said Beijing’s counterintelligence work was the “greatest long-term threat to our nation’s information and intellectual property, and to our economic vitality,” Wray gave the example of one Fox Hunt target who was given a choice of going back to China or killing themselves. Fox Hunt was launched
INTERNET CURBS: People are rushing to erase their digital footprints after police given powers over online activity, although it might take years for the full effect to be felt At midnight on Tuesday, the Great Firewall of China, the vast apparatus that limits the country’s Internet, appeared to descend on Hong Kong. Unveiling expanded police powers as part of contentious new national security legislation, the Hong Kong government enabled police to censor online speech, and force Internet service providers to hand over user information and shut down platforms. Many residents, already anxious since the legislation took effect last week, rushed to erase their digital footprint of any signs of dissent or support for the past year of protests. Hong Kong Legislator Charles Mok (莫乃光), a pro-democracy member of the Legislative
‘FIGHT FOR FREEDOM’: Hong Kongers will never bow to Beijing, the advocate said, while the US’ envoy to the territory called China’s new security law a ‘tragedy’ The world must stand in solidarity with Hong Kongers after Beijing imposed sweeping national security legislation on the semi-autonomous territory, advocate Joshua Wong (黃之鋒) said yesterday, vowing to continue campaigning for democracy. Wong, one of the territory’s most prominent young advocates and a figure loathed by Beijing, was speaking outside a court where he and fellow advocates are being prosecuted for involvement in last year’s pro-democracy protests. China last week enacted sweeping security legislation for the restless territory, banning acts of subversion, secession, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces. The legislation has sent a wave of fear through the territory, and criminalized dissenting
‘SUICIDE’: Media reports said Park Won-soon went missing on Thursday after a staff member filed a sexual harassment claim against him this week Seoul mayor Park Won-soon, viewed as a potential candidate for the 2022 presidential election, was found dead of an apparent suicide hours after he was reported missing, police said, adding that he was the subject of an undisclosed investigation. In a note he is thought to have left behind on his desk, Park offered his apologies. “I thank everyone who was with me in my life. I apologize to my family for only making them suffer from pain,” according to the note that was released by his office yesterday. Park, in his letter, asked to be cremated and have his remains spread