The continued fighting in eastern Ukraine has made a mockery of the West’s latest attempts to negotiate a ceasefire, but may ultimately pave the way for a more durable peace, analysts say.
It did not take long for the latest truce, brokered by France and Germany and signed in the Belarussian capital, Minsk, last week, to look as impotent as previous deals.
With barely a pause, pro-Russian rebels continued their assault on the key transport hub of Debaltseve, ultimately forcing the Ukrainian military into a humiliating retreat.
Photo: Reuters
“It was a classic case of good intentions paving the way to hell,” Ievgen Vorobiov of the Polish Institute of International Affairs said.
“[German Chancellor Angela] Merkel saw the situation was deteriorating fast and that the United States was talking about supplying arms and escalating the conflict, and felt she needed to act,” he said.
“But she didn’t have a Plan B if the ceasefire failed, and she had nothing to enforce it — neither military power nor more sanctions,” he added.
The West has struggled to formulate a response to the continued fighting. Merkel and French President Francois Hollande emerged from a meeting in Paris on Friday offering nothing but further calls for the truce to be respected.
Russian President Vladimir Putin continues to deny he is directly backing the rebels, even as NATO remains adamant that his special forces, artillery and air defense units are still very much active in Ukraine. However, some analysts say the battle for Debaltseve was inevitable, with the rebels clearly seeking more territory and resources to make a viable mini-state out of their fiefdom in the east.
It also had symbolic importance, having been a key focus of military campaigns during the 19th and 20th centuries.
France and Germany may have decided to accept the fall of Debaltseve as the price for peace, said Jorg Forbrig of the German Marshall Fund of the US, a think tank.
“They are not naive. Perhaps they think now this question is in a sense settled, it could contribute to a more durable ceasefire,” Forbig said.
The question is whether the rebels will now pressure other areas, notably the port city of Mariupol. However, Balazs Jarabik, of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the rebels may be reluctant to attack a million-strong city of mostly Russian speakers.
“The more bloody the rebel advance, the more it proves right those who say Russia must be stopped,” Jarabik said. “Putin has already achieved his main goals — he’s taken Crimea, he has a frozen conflict in the east. Now he needs the fighting to stop so that the international pressure on him falls.”
Russia has encouraged “frozen conflicts” elsewhere in its neighborhood, for instance in Georgia and Moldova where it has fueled separatist movements just enough to keep the countries unstable and make them unattractive partners for the West.
However, even if the ceasefire holds, many see the deal as heavily weighted in Russia’s favor.
“It puts all the cards in rebel and Russian hands,” Kadri Liik of the European Council on Foreign Relations said.
“The first Minsk accord [signed in September] prepared the ground for a frozen conflict, but the second has handed exactly the sort of leverage to Russia that it has been seeking,” she said.
She points to clauses that say Ukraine will only regain control of its border by the end of the year, and only after constitutional reforms that will leave Russia with a powerful say over affairs in the east. The other problem is whether Kiev — with its economy in freefall and its politicians at each other’s throats — is ready for the difficult political negotiations to come.
“It’s more and more clear that the West isn’t able to mobilize the money that Ukraine needs, and that the government in Kiev can’t pull its act together,” Jarabik said. “This needs to be the focus now. If there’s no political progress, then there will be a return to fighting.”
And then there is the wider geopolitical problem of whether Russia and the West can ever patch up their differences after a year in which relations have dive-bombed.
The problem is a basic difference in how they view the world: The West sees a rules-based system, Russia sees great powers defending their spheres of interest, Liik said.
“What the West wants is a profound change in Russia’s behavior, and that will not be easy, particularly since the West’s track record has been chaotic and unimpressive,” she said.
THE ‘MONSTER’: The Philippines on Saturday sent a vessel to confront a 12,000-tonne Chinese ship that had entered its exclusive economic zone The Philippines yesterday said it deployed a coast guard ship to challenge Chinese patrol boats attempting to “alter the existing status quo” of the disputed South China Sea. Philippine Coast Guard spokesman Commodore Jay Tarriela said Chinese patrol ships had this year come as close as 60 nautical miles (111km) west of the main Philippine island of Luzon. “Their goal is to normalize such deployments, and if these actions go unnoticed and unchallenged, it will enable them to alter the existing status quo,” he said in a statement. He later told reporters that Manila had deployed a coast guard ship to the area
RISING TENSIONS: The nations’ three leaders discussed China’s ‘dangerous and unlawful behavior in the South China Sea,’ and agreed on the importance of continued coordination Japan, the Philippines and the US vowed to further deepen cooperation under a trilateral arrangement in the face of rising tensions in Asia’s waters, the three nations said following a call among their leaders. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr and outgoing US President Joe Biden met via videoconference on Monday morning. Marcos’ communications office said the leaders “agreed to enhance and deepen economic, maritime and technology cooperation.” The call followed a first-of-its-kind summit meeting of Marcos, Biden and then-Japanese prime minister Fumio Kishida in Washington in April last year that led to a vow to uphold international
US president-elect Donald Trump is not typically known for his calm or reserve, but in a craftsman’s workshop in rural China he sits in divine contemplation. Cross-legged with his eyes half-closed in a pose evoking the Buddha, this porcelain version of the divisive US leader-in-waiting is the work of designer and sculptor Hong Jinshi (洪金世). The Zen-like figures — which Hong sells for between 999 and 20,000 yuan (US$136 to US$2,728) depending on their size — first went viral in 2021 on the e-commerce platform Taobao, attracting national headlines. Ahead of the real-estate magnate’s inauguration for a second term on Monday next week,
‘PLAINLY ERRONEOUS’: The justice department appealed a Trump-appointed judge’s blocking of the release of a report into election interference by the incoming president US Special Counsel Jack Smith, who led the federal cases against US president-elect Donald Trump on charges of trying to overturn his 2020 election defeat and mishandling of classified documents, has resigned after submitting his investigative report on Trump, an expected move that came amid legal wrangling over how much of that document can be made public in the days ahead. The US Department of Justice disclosed Smith’s departure in a footnote of a court filing on Saturday, saying he had resigned one day earlier. The resignation, 10 days before Trump is inaugurated, follows the conclusion of two unsuccessful criminal prosecutions