Fri, Jan 03, 2014 page7

• US politicians plan for midterm elections

  SIMILAR STATES: Republican and Democrat politicians have designs on the other’s hold on the US House and Senate as the last midterms of Obama’s term approach

  • AP, ATLANTA, Georgia
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  US Republicans and Democrats are looking for fresh ways to pitch old arguments as they head into the final midterm election year of US President Barack Obama’s time in the White House.

  Eager to capitalize as the president’s job approval rating hovers in the low 40 percent range, Republicans are looking to hammer the clumsy implementation of Obama’s healthcare overhaul and bemoan an economy that, while improving, still grows too slowly. They are already painting Democrats as fiscally irresponsible underlings of an increasingly unpopular president whose government creates more problems than it solves.

  Democrats say they will run as the party of average Americans and paint Republicans as out-of-touch allies of the wealthy, with a stubborn streak that forced a partial government shutdown and still prevents practical solutions for national problems. They are advocating populist positions like a minimum-wage increase and an end to tax breaks for energy companies, and they are already reminding voters of Republicans’ struggle to connect with women, non-whites and younger Americans.

  They are also looking to exploit the rift between Tea Party conservatives and establishment Republicans.

  Republicans hold the US House majority, and Democrats control the US Senate; so each side wants to reclaim a second chamber to end the Capitol Hill divide that has largely resulted in gridlock for the past three years. Also at stake are a majority of governors’ seats, which control key policy decisions around the country and will help shape the landscape for the 2016 presidential election.

  Leaders and strategists from each party insist that they will have fresh twists to the healthcare fight now entering its fourth year. Since much of the healthcare law takes effect this year, voters will be reacting to actual outcomes rather than just political hyperbole from either side.

  “Obamacare is in absolute chaos,” wrote Republican Senate campaign spokesman Brad Dayspring in his year-end review. “Vulnerable Democratic incumbents and candidates ... can’t keep their own spin straight.”

  Republicans have enjoyed the technical struggles of the federal online exchanges where customers can attempt to buy coverage.

  However, perhaps the best gift for the Republicans: Insurers dropping tens of thousands of policy holders and offering them more comprehensive — and expensive — coverage despite Obama’s explicit promise in 2010 that “if you like your plan, you can keep it.”

  That promises to be an acute issue for several Senate Democrats — Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Kay Hagan of North Carolina — who are running for re-election for the first time since voting for the healthcare law in 2010.

  Many Democrats concede that the president’s 2010 promise could be a millstone. They counter that Republicans’ core argument, particularly from their most conservative candidates, is for outright repeal: House Republicans, including many running for key Senate seats, have voted more than 40 times to scrap the entire law.

  “Everything we see tells us that voters want to improve the law, not repeal it,” said Representative Steve Israel, the New York Democrat who chairs his party’s congressional campaign committee. A Gallup poll last month showed that 54 percent of Americans disapprove of the law, but just 32 percent support repeal.

  As important for Democrats: Most of the 32 percent are Republicans. The poll found that about 66 percent of Republican voters want the entire law gone. That pushes Republican primary candidates to the extreme on the issue, Israel argues, playing into the more general Democratic argument that Republicans’ are out of step.

  A proposed minimum-wage increase — to more than US$10 per hour — could become a defining part of that argument. And Israel said his caucus will push votes to end corporate tax breaks like those for oil and gas companies.

  “This election is going to be about who’s got your back,” Israel said. “Republicans continue to show they have the back of powerful special interests. Democrats have the back of the middle class.”

  The ongoing budget debate could be the wild card. The Senate’s Democratic budget chief, Patty Murray of Washington, and her House counterpart, Republican Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, crafted a spending deal early last month.

  Conservative groups assailed the plan for insufficient spending cuts, prompting Speaker John Boehner and other Republican leaders to lash out at Tea Party-backed critics of the deal, which easily passed both the House and Senate.

  There will be another vote to increase the US’ borrowing limit next month or in March, perhaps setting up a replay of the autumn showdown when Republican conservatives forced a partial government closure with their failed attempt to defund Obama’s healthcare overhaul.

  Republican strategist Chip Lake in Georgia called the autumn gambit “a defining moment in our party” that set the stage for the Ryan-Murray agreement and Boehner pushing back at internal party critics.

  “We’ve always navigated this divide,” Lake said, “but you’re going to see it play out very visibly over the next year.”

  Arch-conservative voices insist the hard line is the right path.

  “Republicans won big in 2010 because people understood where they stood on things like Obamacare,” said Dean Clancy of FreedomWorks PAC, which has helped elect Tea Party clarions like Senator Ted Cruz of Texas. “I think Republicans will do well in 2014 if they similarly make clear they are for individual liberty and constitutionally limited government.”

  Exit polls from the 2012 presidential election showed that, even with Obama’s victory, a narrow majority of Americans thought the government was doing too much. Yet polls from the autumn suggested voters, particularly independents, blamed Republicans for the partial shutdown, and Israel said any repeat will help Democrats.

  The president’s party usually loses seats at the six-year mark of an administration, and the midterm electorate often tilts toward the Republicans, as Democrats have more difficulty turning out more casual voters — particularly younger and minority citizens — who favor them in presidential election years.

  Facing those historical headwinds, Democrats need a net gain of 17 seats to regain control of the House, with all 435 seats up for grabs. Democrats say they are targeting about 60 seats, while the Republican Party believes the competitive number is considerably lower. Republicans must net six new Senate seats — out of 35 on the ballot — to regain control of the upper chamber.

  Democrats are defending 21 seats, including several in states Obama lost. Republicans have a similar challenge in governor’s races, where the 22 seats they are defending include several in states Obama won twice — Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida, among them. Democrats are defending 14 governor’s seats. Republicans hold a 29-21 advantage nationally.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Man convicted of double murder to be executed tonight

  • 2

    TSMC and Nvidia team up on silicon photonics, CEO Jensen Huang says

  • 3

    Taiwan start-up hub established in Silicon Valley

  • 4

    NT dollar could replace yuan as Asia’s top currency

  • 5

    Hegseth vows to maintain peace in Strait