Hints, warnings and coded political signals from Israel about a possible strike against Iran are piling pressure on US President Barack Obama and fueling an explosive election-year debate.
Obama personally weighed into the churning speculation on Sunday, saying he did not believe Israel had yet made a decision to attack underground Iranian nuclear facilities it views as a threat to its existence.
And the president forcibly argued that “unprecedented” tougher sanctions on Iran were having a painful impact.
“They are feeling the pinch. They are feeling the pressure,” Obama told NBC.
Speculation about a strike on Iran’s nuclear program hit new heights when Israeli intelligence writer Ronen Bergman concluded a week ago in a New York Times Magazine article that Israel would attack Iran this year.
Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak sent reverberations through Washington when he called for timely, but unspecified action against Iran, adding: “Whoever says ‘later’ might find that ‘later’ is too late.”
Then, Washington Post columnist David Ignatius set off alarm bells by writing that US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta believed there was a “strong likelihood that Israel will strike Iran in April, May or June.”
“President Obama and Panetta are said to have cautioned the Israelis that the United States opposed an attack,” Ignatius wrote.
Panetta refused to elaborate, but did not contradict the article, deepening intrigue over Israel’s next move.
Even if it has not decided to act, analysts say Israel may see martial rhetoric as a way to press for more non-military pressure on Iran.
“Israel is effectively pressing the US Congress and the president to pass more sanctions and implement those that have passed as quickly as possible,” said Cliff Kupchan, an Iran specialist with the Eurasia Group risk consultancy.
Kupchan said that the feeling that Israel could attack might also be seen as an attempt to force Tehran back to nuclear talks.
Some observers in Washington calculate that Israel may be bluffing because previous military strikes, like the suspected assault on a Syrian nuclear reactor in 2007, were not preceded by saber rattling.
Israeli leaders might also not yet be ready to unleash the dire consequences of an attack, which could include reprisal missile strikes by Iran and action by allied terror groups against the Jewish state.
However, no one can say categorically what Israel plans to do.
The saga has again exposed divisions between the White House and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, which may be on show again when the Israeli leader visits Washington next month.
The US administration has signaled that it believes the last resort scenario that would see a strike on Iranian nuclear sites has not yet been reached.
“Israel has indicated that they’re considering this ... we have indicated our concerns,” Panetta told reporters last week.
Iran expert Trita Parsi said that as the White House steps up pressure on Iran, bellicose rhetoric from Israel could be helpful if it spooks Tehran over the possibility of an attack.
However, Parsi, author of a new book on Obama’s Iran policy called A Single Roll of the Dice, warned that using the implied threat of war if sanctions do not stop the nuclear program was a large gamble.
“The administration knows that there are moving parts which it does not control,” Parsi said, referring to uncertainty about how Israel or Iran could react in moments of high crisis.
A unilateral military strike by Israel would have deep strategic consequences for the US and grave political implications for Obama.
Washington would almost certainly be drawn into a new conflagration in the Middle East at a time when Obama wants to claim credit for getting troops home from Iraq.
Oil prices would shoot up, crimping the US economic recovery just as it speeds up and slowing jobs growth that Obama needs to win re-election.
Israeli leaders, keen students and practitioners of US politics, understand this and know Obama may be vulnerable to pressure during his re-election bid.
Daniel Levy of the New America Foundation said the tough talk from Israel and sense of crisis had not been triggered by sudden advances by Iran on its nuclear program — but by politics.
“The only reason why that this is anywhere near the top of the agenda, where it is now, is because of the American presidential election,” Levy said.
A colossal explosion in the sky, unleashing energy hundreds of times greater than the Hiroshima bomb. A blinding flash nearly as bright as the sun. Shockwaves powerful enough to flatten everything for miles. It might sound apocalyptic, but a newly detected asteroid nearly the size of a football field now has a greater than 1 percent chance of colliding with Earth in about eight years. Such an impact has the potential for city-level devastation, depending on where it strikes. Scientists are not panicking yet, but they are watching closely. “At this point, it’s: ‘Let’s pay a lot of attention, let’s
UNDAUNTED: Panama would not renew an agreement to participate in Beijing’s Belt and Road project, its president said, proposing technical-level talks with the US US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday threatened action against Panama without immediate changes to reduce Chinese influence on the canal, but the country’s leader insisted he was not afraid of a US invasion and offered talks. On his first trip overseas as the top US diplomat, Rubio took a guided tour of the canal, accompanied by its Panamanian administrator as a South Korean-affiliated oil tanker and Marshall Islands-flagged cargo ship passed through the vital link between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. However, Rubio was said to have had a firmer message in private, telling Panama that US President Donald Trump
CHEER ON: Students were greeted by citizens who honked their car horns or offered them food and drinks, while taxi drivers said they would give marchers a lift home Hundreds of students protesting graft they blame for 15 deaths in a building collapse on Friday marched through Serbia to the northern city of Novi Sad, where they plan to block three Danube River bridges this weekend. They received a hero’s welcome from fellow students and thousands of local residents in Novi Said after arriving on foot in their two-day, 80km journey from Belgrade. A small red carpet was placed on one of the bridges across the Danube that the students crossed as they entered the city. The bridge blockade planned for yesterday is to mark three months since a huge concrete construction
DIVERSIFY: While Japan already has plentiful access to LNG, a pipeline from Alaska would help it move away from riskier sources such as Russia and the Middle East Japan is considering offering support for a US$44 billion gas pipeline in Alaska as it seeks to court US President Donald Trump and forestall potential trade friction, three officials familiar with the matter said. Officials in Tokyo said Trump might raise the project, which he has said is key for US prosperity and security, when he meets Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba for the first time in Washington as soon as next week, the sources said. Japan has doubts about the viability of the proposed 1,287km pipeline — intended to link fields in Alaska’s north to a port in the south, where