Deadly NATO strikes have sapped Pakistan’s appetite for helping the US carve out a settlement in Afghanistan, experts say, with army chiefs under pressure from their furious junior ranks.
The killing of 24 soldiers in attacks on two Pakistani posts close to the Afghan border on Saturday last week has prompted fury in the nuclear-armed Muslim nation, where there is little love for the alliance with Washington.
Pakistan’s government says it will boycott an international conference on Afghanistan taking place in Germany on Monday, undermining attempts to stabilize the country after 2014 when foreign combat forces are scheduled to leave.
The army, Pakistan’s most powerful institution, summoned hand-picked journalists to denounce the US and NATO’s “deliberate act of aggression.”
“Officers were very angry,” said one person who attended. “They are also under pressure from the soldiers, mid-level officers and the families of the victims who tell them: ‘Why do you stand with people who kill our soldiers?’”
It is the second time in six months that Pakistani Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Kayani, has faced the wrath of junior officers incensed over the US attack.
The army has already been weakened by the covert US raid on May 2 that killed Osama bin Laden near its top academy, humiliating the military and shocking a nation obsessed by infringements of sovereignty.
Pakistan believes it has paid too high a price for signing up to the US-led “war on terror” in the dark days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
The army has hardened its tone towards Washington since the bin Laden raid, leaving political parties trailing in its wake and -compounding US fears that it is still playing a double game with its old friends the Taliban.
In September, Pakistan closed ranks and called for peace and reconciliation, a message destined primarily for homegrown Taliban.
The moment was well chosen: worn down by years of Pakistani offensives and US missile strikes, the domestic Taliban were more receptive. Some have even said that exploratory peace talks have begun.
In the past six months, the number of attacks has fallen.
“The more tensions you have in the relationships with Washington, the less attacks there are in Pakistan,” said Pakistani analyst Rahimullah Yousufzai.
Another factor is the movement of the Taliban into Afghanistan. The army says 1,000 to 1,200 foot soldiers have crossed the border in the last year.
In Afghanistan, they have sought to take advantage of a vacuum. NATO plans to withdraw all combat troops by the end of 2014 and has already abandoned various outposts in eastern Afghanistan.
In the northwestern city of Peshawar, religious political party Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam is said to have urged local Taliban to scale back attacks at home and concentrate on fighting the US in Afghanistan.
“The army was not allowing Taliban to cross to Afghanistan too much — now they do,” and Pakistanis are joining the insurgents fighting NATO, one Taliban member said.
The West is nervous about the prospect of a Taliban build-up. Diplomats see a political solution, facilitated by Pakistan, as the only answer to avoiding another civil war in Afghanistan.
However, in Pakistan’s eyes, that requires trust and respect from the US, which Thursday dismissed the notion of offering an apology to Islamabad over the deaths of the 24 soldiers, saying an inquiry was still ongoing.
Hungarian authorities temporarily detained seven Ukrainian citizens and seized two armored cars carrying tens of millions of euros in cash across Hungary on suspicion of money laundering, officials said on Friday. The Ukrainians were released on Friday, following their detention on Thursday, but Hungarian officials held onto the cash, prompting Ukraine to accuse Hungary’s Russia-friendly government of illegally seizing the money. “We will not tolerate this state banditism,” Ukrainian Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrii Sybiha said. The seven detained Ukrainians were employees of the Ukrainian state-owned Oschadbank, who were traveling in the two armored cars that were carrying the money between Austria and
Australians were downloading virtual private networks (VPNs) in droves, while one of the world’s largest porn distributors said it was blocking users from its platforms as the country yesterday rolled out sweeping online age restriction. Australia in December became the first country to impose a nationwide ban on teenagers using social media. A separate law now requires artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot services to keep certain content — including pornography, extreme violence and self-harm and eating disorder material — from minors or face fines of up to A$49.5 million (US$34.6 million). The country also joined Britain, France and dozens of US states requiring
Kosovar President Vjosa Osmani on Friday after dissolving the Kosovar parliament said a snap election should be held as soon as possible to avoid another prolonged political crisis in the Balkan country at a time of global turmoil. Osmani said it is important for Kosovo to wrap up the upcoming election process and form functional institutions for political stability as the war rages in the Middle East. “Precisely because the geopolitical situation is that complex, it is important to finish this electoral process which is coming up,” she said. “It is very hard now to imagine what will happen next.” Kosovo, which declared
MORE BANS: Australia last year required sites to remove accounts held by under-16s, with a few countries pushing for similar action at an EU level and India considering its own ban Indonesia on Friday said it would ban social media access for children under 16, citing threats from online pornography, cyberbullying, online fraud and Internet addiction. “Accounts belonging to children under 16 on high-risk platforms will start to be deactivated, beginning with YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, X, Bigo Live and Roblox,” Indonesian Minister of Communications and Digital Meutya Hafid said. “The government is stepping in so that parents no longer have to fight alone against the giants of the algorithm. Implementation will begin on March 28, 2026,” she said. The social media ban would be introduced in stages “until all platforms fulfill their