The US Supreme Court on Tuesday delved into the issue of privacy amid 21st-century technology, hearing arguments on whether police can use a GPS device attached to a vehicle to track a suspect without a search warrant.
The US government asked the justices to reinstate the conviction of Washington nightclub owner Antoine Jones for drug dealing that had been overturned by an appeals court, which found the warrantless tracking “creepy” and “un-American.”
At issue is whether by attaching a GPS tracking device without a warrant, police violated the man’s constitutional guarantee in the Fourth Amendment against unreasonable search and seizure.
The case has drawn wide interest from civil liberties groups amid concern that new technologies can be used to get around constitutional protections of privacy and other rights.
US Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben told the nine justices on the top US court that the GPS device simply monitored the suspect’s location on public streets, which could be done by police visually without the need for a warrant.
The US government attorney said the GPS technology simply “can make police more efficient” and that “police efficiency has never been equated with an invasion of privacy.”
However, comments from the justices were skeptical.
“If you win this case, there is nothing preventing you from monitoring the movements of every citizen of the United States 24 hours a day,” Justice Stephen Breyer said.
“If you win, you produce something that sounds like 1984,” he said, making a reference to the George Orwell novel.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the surveillance could increase as technology improves.
Under the same logic used by the government, she said: “It would be OK to take a computer chip and put it on somebody’s overcoat and follow them” without a warrant or “track people with smartphones.”
Attorney Stephen Leckar argued on behalf of Jones that allowing the evidence to be used in court would give police “the capacity to engage in a grave abuse of liberties.”
Leckar said the use of the tracking device was “an unreasonable invasion of privacy” and that police must obtain a warrant to avoid a constitutional violation.
But the justices pointed out that setting any standard is complex.
“What is the difference between following somebody for 12 hours and monitoring someone using GPS for 12 hours?” Justice Samuel Alito asked.
The case is seen as an important test of how far police can go in using technology to investigate and track suspects.
In the Jones case, police had obtained a warrant to place the device in the suspect’s car, but it had expired. Police used the GPS device to track Jones to a stash house, where they found cocaine, weapons and drug paraphernalia. He was convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and sentenced to life in prison.
An appellate court overturned the conviction, and Judge Alex Kozinski wrote in his opinion: “There is something creepy and un-American about such clandestine and underhanded behavior. To those of us who have lived under a totalitarian regime, there is an eerie feeling of deja vu.”
At the Supreme Court hearing on Tuesday, US Chief Justice John Roberts pondered how far police could go in such investigations.
“If you put a GPS on all of our cars and monitored our movements for a month, would that be OK?” he asked the US Department of Justice lawyer.
“The answer is yes,” Dreeben replied.
“The FBI could put surveillance on any individual,” he said.
Outside the court, co-defense lawyer Walter Dellinger said the admission by the government that a few thousand GPS devices are being used in similar cases was “not very reassuring” and said it was an “intrusion into the rights” of Jones and others, if no warrant is obtained.
The top court is expected to rule on the case before its term ends next June.
In months, Lo Yuet-ping would bid farewell to a centuries-old village he has called home in Hong Kong for more than seven decades. The Cha Kwo Ling village in east Kowloon is filled with small houses built from metal sheets and stones, as well as old granite buildings, contrasting sharply with the high-rise structures that dominate much of the Asian financial hub. Lo, 72, has spent his entire life here and is among an estimated 860 households required to move under a government redevelopment plan. He said he would miss the rich history, unique culture and warm interpersonal kindness that defined life in
AERIAL INCURSIONS: The incidents are a reminder that Russia’s aggressive actions go beyond Ukraine’s borders, Ukrainian Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrii Sybiha said Two NATO members on Sunday said that Russian drones violated their airspace, as one reportedly flew into Romania during nighttime attacks on neighboring Ukraine, while another crashed in eastern Latvia the previous day. A drone entered Romanian territory early on Sunday as Moscow struck “civilian targets and port infrastructure” across the Danube in Ukraine, the Romanian Ministry of National Defense said. It added that Bucharest had deployed F-16 warplanes to monitor its airspace and issued text alerts to residents of two eastern regions. It also said investigations were underway of a potential “impact zone” in an uninhabited area along the Romanian-Ukrainian border. There
The governor of Ohio is to send law enforcement and millions of dollars in healthcare resources to the city of Springfield as it faces a surge in temporary Haitian migrants. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine on Tuesday said that he does not oppose the Temporary Protected Status program under which about 15,000 Haitians have arrived in the city of about 59,000 people since 2020, but said the federal government must do more to help affected communities. On Monday, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost directed his office to research legal avenues — including filing a lawsuit — to stop the federal government from sending
Three sisters from Ohio who inherited a dime kept in a bank vault for more than 40 years knew it had some value, but they had no idea just how much until just a few years ago. The extraordinarily rare coin, struck by the US Mint in San Francisco in 1975, could bring more than US$500,000, said Ian Russell, president of GreatCollections, which specializes in currency and is handling an online auction that ends next month. What makes the dime depicting former US president Franklin D. Roosevelt so valuable is a missing “S” mint mark for San Francisco, one of just two