There were no celebrations, and there was no mourning. It did not occur to anyone to make a US President Barack Obama effigy; no US flags were burnt. There were no heated debates about whether Osama bin Laden was a martyr. The buses that were set ablaze in Karachi had nothing to do with the high drama in Abbotabad. The crowd in front of Karachi Press Club was a group of private bank employees wanting their jobs back. The little group at the gates of the electricity company offices was demanding nothing more than some good, clean electricity.
A hunger strike camp with young men’s posters was part of a campaign to recover young men who have nothing at all to do with al-Qaeda.
In fact, the reaction to the killing of bin Laden was so subdued that a colleague said that there weren’t even any text messages in circulation with conspiracy theories and inevitable jokes about Osama’s wives. Pakistanis are not in denial. Just busy. They are busy fighting a hundred little battles that do not involve US Navy Seals or helicopter crashes or Arab tycoons. These battles are as vicious as any that you have seen in the past 10 years, but they don’t make good TV. How do you create high drama out of millions of industrial laborers being laid off because there is no electricity? How do you sex up the banal fact that every tenth child in the world who never sees the inside of a schoolroom is a Pakistani child?
So it fell to our TV pundits to prove that we were also part of this global soap opera. They raged against yet another invasion of our much-molested sovereignty. They demanded transparency from the US. They wanted footage. How many hours of news can you spin out of a single, bullet-riddled mugshot?
In the real world, an -educationist and chronic optimist tried to fantasize.
“So the party is over,” he enthused. “Americans will go home. Our boys will ask their jihadi boys to pack up, surely?”
Someone reminded him: “Have you been to a party lately, sir? Nobody goes home.”
Pakistan’s security establishment, of course, went into a sulky silence, and wasn’t around to reassure us. Were they protecting bin Laden? Or were they so hopelessly inefficient that they couldn’t track the world’s most recognizable face when he was camped out practically at the edge of the Pakistani army’s most famous parade ground? As they are answerable only to their mistrusting partners and permanent paymasters in Washington, they didn’t feel like obliging us with any information.
However, anyone who has lived through Pakistan’s three military dictatorships sponsored by Washington can tell you there is no need to be such a reductionist. Why can’t Pakistan’s security establishment do both? Why can’t they shelter him and then forget about the fact that they were sheltering him? Or why can’t they shelter him and then sell him out at a later stage?
Pakistan’s army is often accused, mostly by their best friends in Washington, of double-dealing and fighting on both sides of this war. In its long role as rent-an-army to the US, it has been accused of becoming a mafia, a secretive clan and a corporation, all at the same time, but what does it feel like to live under this bloody delusion? It is like watching a person whose one hand is hacking away at his other hand.
There is blood, there are cries of pain, and there is the obvious sound of one hand hacking away at the other. The person keeps looking around trying to figure out who is doing this to him. Military operations and house-to-house searches to look for the hidden hand end up where they started.
On Tuesday afternoon, an official from the Inter-Services Intelligence agency did come up with a frank, but not very reassuring explanation about that house in Abbottabad. It was embarrassing, he told the BBC World Service. And then went on to reminisce about their past victories, duly acknowledged and celebrated by their Washington counterparts.
“We are good, but not gods,” he said.
What he really should have said is that we are gods, but not good.
Mohammed Hanif is a journalist and author.
ACTIONABLE ADVICE: The majority of chatbots tested provided guidance on weapons, tactics and target selections, with Perplexity and Meta AI deemed to be the least safe From school shootings to synagogue bombings, leading artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots helped researchers plot violent attacks, according to a study published on Wednesday that highlighted the technology’s potential for real-world harm. Researchers from the nonprofit watchdog Center for Countering Digital Hate and CNN posed as 13-year-old boys in the US and Ireland to test 10 chatbots, including ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Perplexity, Deepseek and Meta AI. Eight of the chatbots assisted the make-believe attackers in more than half the responses, providing advice on “locations to target” and “weapons to use” in an attack, the study said. The chatbots had become a “powerful accelerant for
Australians were downloading virtual private networks (VPNs) in droves, while one of the world’s largest porn distributors said it was blocking users from its platforms as the country yesterday rolled out sweeping online age restriction. Australia in December became the first country to impose a nationwide ban on teenagers using social media. A separate law now requires artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot services to keep certain content — including pornography, extreme violence and self-harm and eating disorder material — from minors or face fines of up to A$49.5 million (US$34.6 million). The country also joined Britain, France and dozens of US states requiring
Since the war in the Middle East began nearly two weeks ago, the telephone at Ron Hubbard’s bomb shelter company in Texas has not stopped ringing. Foreign and US clients are rushing to buy his bunkers, seeking refuge in case of air raids, nuclear fallout or apocalypse. With the US and Israel pounding Iran, and Tehran retaliating with strikes across the region, Hubbard has seen demand for his product soar, mostly from Gulf nation customers in Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates. “You can imagine how many people are thinking: ‘I wish I had a bomb shelter,’” Hubbard, 63, said in
STILL IN POWER: US intelligence reports showed that the Iranian regime is not in danger of collapse and retains control of the public, casting doubt on Trump’s exit Nearly every US Senate Democrat on Wednesday signed a letter sent to US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth requesting a “swift investigation” of airstrikes on a girls’ school in Iran that killed scores of children and any other potential US military actions causing civilian harm. Reuters reported on Thursday last week that US military investigators believe it is likely that US forces were responsible for the Feb. 28 strike on the school, as US and Israeli forces launched attacks on Iran. “The results of this school attack are horrific. The majority of those killed in the strikes were girls between the ages
RSS