The latest international deal on climate, reached early on Saturday after days of hard bargaining, was described by exhausted delegates as a “step forward” in grappling with global warming. If they step too far, however, they’re going to bump into an elephant in the room.
That would be the US Republican Party and nobody at the Cancun meetings wanted to talk about the impending Republican takeover of the US House of Representatives. It essentially rules out any new, legally binding pact requiring the US and other major emitters of global warming gases to reduce their emissions.
In endless hours of speeches at the annual UN climate conference, the US political situation was hardly mentioned, despite its crucial role in how the world will confront what the Cancun final documents called “one of the greatest challenges of our time.”
Not everyone held their tongue. Seas rising from warming, and threatening their homes, got Pacific Islanders talking.
Nauru President Marcus Stephen spoke despairingly of “governments deadlocked because of ideological divisions.”
Tuvalu Deputy Prime Minister Enele Sopoaga referred to the “backward politics” of one unnamed developed nation.
A US friend, Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi told a large gathering here: “The key thing for us is not whether the American Congress is controlled by this or that party,” but that richer nations help the developing world with financial support — for clean energy sources, new seawalls, new water systems and other projects to try to stem and cope with climate change and the droughts, floods, disease and extreme weather it portends.
“Which party” does matter, however. Many Republicans dismiss scientific evidence of human-caused warming, citing arguments by skeptics that the large majority of scientists are wrong or that the consequences of warming are overstated.
Early in the two-week conference here, four Republican members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee sent a letter to US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton demanding a freeze on about US$3 billion in planned US climate aid for this year and next year.
The senators said some findings of the UN’s climate change panel “were found to be exaggerated or simply not true” and said that at a time of record US budget deficits, “no American taxpayer dollars should be committed to a global climate fund based on information that is not accurate.”
The leader of the protest, Senator John Barrasso, called the financing an “international climate change bailout.”
What will they call the long-term finance plan embraced at the Cancun conference, for US$100 billion a year in US and other international climate financing by 2020?
Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, who with Zenawi co-chaired a UN panel on climate financing, was asked how this US opposition can be overcome.
“I believe that many things might happen in American politics in a period of 10 years,” he replied.
Such long, wishful views have dominated the climate talks for two decades, as the US remained outside the 1997 Kyoto Protocol and the modest mandatory reductions in emissions that other industrial nations accepted.
For the world to agree on a new, all-encompassing treaty with deeper cuts to succeed Kyoto, whose targets expire in 2012, the US Congress must pass legislation to cap US industrial emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
Instead, the Cancun talks, waiting for another day, focused on small steps on climate: Some advances in establishing a system to compensate developing nations for protecting their forests, for example, and in setting up a global clearinghouse for “green” technology for developing nations.
Cancun’s chief accomplishment was to decide to create, with details to come, a Green Climate Fund that will handle those expected tens of billions of dollars in climate support.
This slowly, slowly approach began at the climate summit in Copenhagen last year, when the US, China, other big emitters and some small ones pledged to carry out voluntary reductions in emissions.
Some say this will be the way global warming will be addressed, not with “topdown,” legally binding treaties, but with self-assigned targets, bilateral deals to help create low-carbon economies and aspirational goals set by G20 summits. If the world busies itself with such voluntary activities, this thinking goes, it may all add up to climate protection.
However, scientists do numbers better than politicians. And the latest UN scientific calculation shows that the current emissions--reduction pledges, even if all are fulfilled, will barely get the world halfway to keeping temperatures rising to dangerous levels. The US pledge — based on executive, not congressional action — is for a mere 3 percent reduction of emissions below 1990 levels.
If too little is done, the UN science network foresees temperatures rising by up to 6.4oC by 2100. In a timely reminder of what’s at stake, NASA reported last week that January to November this year was the warmest globally in the 131-year record.
At that rate, climate will become the elephant no one can ignore.
HOLLYWOOD IN TURMOIL: Mandy Moore, Paris Hilton and Cary Elwes lost properties to the flames, while awards events planned for this week have been delayed Fires burning in and around Los Angeles have claimed the homes of numerous celebrities, including Billy Crystal, Mandy Moore and Paris Hilton, and led to sweeping disruptions of entertainment events, while at least five people have died. Three awards ceremonies planned for this weekend have been postponed. Next week’s Oscar nominations have been delayed, while tens of thousands of city residents had been displaced and were awaiting word on whether their homes survived the flames — some of them the city’s most famous denizens. More than 1,900 structures had been destroyed and the number was expected to increase. More than 130,000 people
THE ‘MONSTER’: The Philippines on Saturday sent a vessel to confront a 12,000-tonne Chinese ship that had entered its exclusive economic zone The Philippines yesterday said it deployed a coast guard ship to challenge Chinese patrol boats attempting to “alter the existing status quo” of the disputed South China Sea. Philippine Coast Guard spokesman Commodore Jay Tarriela said Chinese patrol ships had this year come as close as 60 nautical miles (111km) west of the main Philippine island of Luzon. “Their goal is to normalize such deployments, and if these actions go unnoticed and unchallenged, it will enable them to alter the existing status quo,” he said in a statement. He later told reporters that Manila had deployed a coast guard ship to the area
A group of Uyghur men who were detained in Thailand more than one decade ago said that the Thai government is preparing to deport them to China, alarming activists and family members who say the men are at risk of abuse and torture if they are sent back. Forty-three Uyghur men held in Bangkok made a public appeal to halt what they called an imminent threat of deportation. “We could be imprisoned and we might even lose our lives,” the letter said. “We urgently appeal to all international organizations and countries concerned with human rights to intervene immediately to save us from
Some things might go without saying, but just in case... Belgium’s food agency issued a public health warning as the festive season wrapped up on Tuesday: Do not eat your Christmas tree. The unusual message came after the city of Ghent, an environmentalist stronghold in the country’s East Flanders region, raised eyebrows by posting tips for recycling the conifers on the dinner table. Pointing with enthusiasm to examples from Scandinavia, the town Web site suggested needles could be stripped, blanched and dried — for use in making flavored butter, for instance. Asked what they thought of the idea, the reply
RSS