Germany said it would extend the life of its nuclear reactors by 12 years on average yesterday after marathon talks on the controversial issue that will shape the energy policy of Europe’s top economy.
The decision came after 12 hours of talks between senior politicians and means that some of the 17 plants will now be operational until the 2030s.
The lives of older plants will be extended by eight years and those of newer ones by 14 years, German Environment Minister Norbert Roettgen said.
He said nuclear utilities would have to pay part of the extra profits gained from the extension to develop renewable energy.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s predecessor Gerhard Schroeder had decided to mothball the reactors by around 2020, but Merkel wanted to postpone the shutdown as part of a new “energy concept” for the country due to go before her Cabinet on Sept. 28.
“We have together found a way to take Germany forward,” German Economy Minister Rainer Bruederle said.
However, the decision was criticized by Greenpeace and other environmental groups as well as Germany’s Green Party.
Austrian Environment Minister Niki Berlakovich termed it a “hard blow for the ... development of renewable energy.
The future of energy supplies lies indisputably in renewable energy,” he said. “In any case, nuclear energy will not answer the problems related to climate or be a solution to reducing carbon dioxide emissions.”
Merkel referred to the extension a “bridge” until renewable sources of energy such as wind and solar power can produce more of Germany’s power as it seeks to reduce dependence on coal.
A debate has raged in the country and in government over how long to extend the life of the reactors and what price to exact from the energy industry, which stands to benefit from the move.
Support for Merkel’s coalition has tumbled in recent opinion polls and surveys suggested a majority of Germans opposed the idea of postponing the date that the country goes nuclear-free.
The chancellor herself, had earlier hinted that her preference was for an extension of 10-15 years, saying this is what is “technically reasonable.”
Not everyone in her squabbling coalition agreed.
A government-commissioned report last month was meant to bring clarity but with so many variables, not least predicting future electricity and oil prices and demographics, it ended up inconclusive.
Without nuclear power, the report said, Germany could forget about its target of reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 80 percent in 2050 from 1990 levels.
Environmental pressure group Greenpeace heaped scorn on the report and accused Merkel of yielding to the powerful nuclear energy lobby, a charge echoed by an increasingly confident opposition.
“Ten or 15 years’ extension. That sounds harmless, but it’s not,” said Tobias Riedl, Greenpeace’s nuclear energy expert, on Friday.
Another item in the mix is the debate over how to make energy companies such as RWE, Vattenfall and E.ON pay for the extension of their plants and make sure they make a greater contribution to Germany’s energy output from renewable sources.
As part of an 80 billion euro (US$103 billion) austerity program from next year to 2014, Berlin wanted to tap energy firms, a quid pro quo for keeping their plants open for longer.
However, the utility companies have focused their considerable lobbying powers on resisting such a levy and the nuclear tax was not in the austerity package the Cabinet approved last Wednesday.
Merkel needs to ensure any draft law will not be subject to approval in the Bundesrat upper house, where she lost her majority earlier this year.
Two medieval fortresses face each other across the Narva River separating Estonia from Russia on Europe’s eastern edge. Once a symbol of cooperation, the “Friendship Bridge” connecting the two snow-covered banks has been reinforced with rows of razor wire and “dragon’s teeth” anti-tank obstacles on the Estonian side. “The name is kind of ironic,” regional border chief Eerik Purgel said. Some fear the border town of more than 50,0000 people — a mixture of Estonians, Russians and people left stateless after the fall of the Soviet Union — could be Russian President Vladimir Putin’s next target. On the Estonian side of the bridge,
Jeremiah Kithinji had never touched a computer before he finished high school. A decade later, he is teaching robotics, and even took a team of rural Kenyans to the World Robotics Olympiad in Singapore. In a classroom in Laikipia County — a sparsely populated grasslands region of northern Kenya known for its rhinos and cheetahs — pupils are busy snapping together wheels, motors and sensors to assemble a robot. Guiding them is Kithinji, 27, who runs a string of robotics clubs in the area that have taken some of his pupils far beyond the rural landscapes outside. In November, he took a team
DIPLOMATIC THAW: The Canadian prime minister’s China visit and improved Beijing-Ottawa ties raised lawyer Zhang Dongshuo’s hopes for a positive outcome in the retrial China has overturned the death sentence of Canadian Robert Schellenberg, a Canadian official said on Friday, in a possible sign of a diplomatic thaw as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney seeks to boost trade ties with Beijing. Schellenberg’s lawyer, Zhang Dongshuo (張東碩), yesterday confirmed China’s Supreme People’s Court struck down the sentence. Schellenberg was detained on drug charges in 2014 before China-Canada ties nosedived following the 2018 arrest in Vancouver of Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou (孟晚舟). That arrest infuriated Beijing, which detained two Canadians — Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig — on espionage charges that Ottawa condemned as retaliatory. In January
SHOW OF SUPPORT: The move showed that aggression toward Greenland is a question for Europe and Canada, and the consequences are global, not just Danish, experts said Canada and France, which adamantly oppose US President Donald Trump’s wish to control Greenland, were to open consulates in the Danish autonomous territory’s capital yesterday, in a strong show of support for the local government. Since returning to the White House last year, Trump has repeatedly insisted that Washington needs to control the strategic, mineral-rich Arctic island for security reasons. Trump last month backed off his threats to seize Greenland after saying he had struck a “framework” deal with NATO chief Mark Rutte to ensure greater US influence. A US-Denmark-Greenland working group has been established to discuss ways to meet Washington’s security concerns
RSS