Japan’s new center-left Prime Minister Naoto Kan easily survived a no-confidence motion yesterday after bitter exchanges in parliament kicked off campaigning for an upper house election next month.
The conservative opposition Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) submitted the motion after the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) changed leaders last week, arguing the new prime minister had no popular mandate.
“Prime Minister Kan, you are the Great Satan who brings maximum unhappiness to Japan,” thundered LDP lawmaker Hideaki Omura in one of the more spirited outbursts, drawing both cheers and howls of disapproval from the chamber.
Kan last week replaced former prime minister Yukio Hatoyama who resigned amid political funding scandals and a dispute over a US airbase after less than nine months in office.
LDP lawmaker Ryosei Akazawa charged that “the Kan administration was formed by merely swapping the heads without asking for the people’s voice. The Kan administration is obviously a government without legitimacy.”
Because Kan’s party has a commanding majority in the powerful lower house, it easily defeated the no-confidence motion which, if passed, would have forced him to step down and dissolve the house for general elections.
The motion was defeated by 315 votes against 153.
The end of the 150-day parliamentary session yesterday effectively kicked off campaigning for upper house elections on July 11.
Kan’s DPJ, riding high in opinion polls, hopes to gain a strong majority in the upper chamber in order to easily pass laws through the Diet and avoid policy gridlock as it rules Asia’s biggest economy.
The DPJ last year ousted the conservative LDP in an electoral landslide, ending their post-war grip on Japanese politics that had been interrupted only once in more than half a century.
“The challenge for our administration is to demolish the past administration, which had thrived on a structure of vested interests,” DPJ lawmaker Katsumasa Suzuki told parliament yesterday.
Two medieval fortresses face each other across the Narva River separating Estonia from Russia on Europe’s eastern edge. Once a symbol of cooperation, the “Friendship Bridge” connecting the two snow-covered banks has been reinforced with rows of razor wire and “dragon’s teeth” anti-tank obstacles on the Estonian side. “The name is kind of ironic,” regional border chief Eerik Purgel said. Some fear the border town of more than 50,0000 people — a mixture of Estonians, Russians and people left stateless after the fall of the Soviet Union — could be Russian President Vladimir Putin’s next target. On the Estonian side of the bridge,
Jeremiah Kithinji had never touched a computer before he finished high school. A decade later, he is teaching robotics, and even took a team of rural Kenyans to the World Robotics Olympiad in Singapore. In a classroom in Laikipia County — a sparsely populated grasslands region of northern Kenya known for its rhinos and cheetahs — pupils are busy snapping together wheels, motors and sensors to assemble a robot. Guiding them is Kithinji, 27, who runs a string of robotics clubs in the area that have taken some of his pupils far beyond the rural landscapes outside. In November, he took a team
SHOW OF SUPPORT: The move showed that aggression toward Greenland is a question for Europe and Canada, and the consequences are global, not just Danish, experts said Canada and France, which adamantly oppose US President Donald Trump’s wish to control Greenland, were to open consulates in the Danish autonomous territory’s capital yesterday, in a strong show of support for the local government. Since returning to the White House last year, Trump has repeatedly insisted that Washington needs to control the strategic, mineral-rich Arctic island for security reasons. Trump last month backed off his threats to seize Greenland after saying he had struck a “framework” deal with NATO chief Mark Rutte to ensure greater US influence. A US-Denmark-Greenland working group has been established to discuss ways to meet Washington’s security concerns
Civil society leaders and members of a left-wing coalition yesterday filed impeachment complaints against Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte, restarting a process sidelined by the Supreme Court last year. Both cases accuse Duterte of misusing public funds during her term as education secretary, while one revives allegations that she threatened to assassinate former ally Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The filings come on the same day that a committee in the House of Representatives was to begin hearings into impeachment complaints against Marcos, accused of corruption tied to a spiraling scandal over bogus flood control projects. Under the constitution, an impeachment by the
RSS