British companies spearheading the drive to exploit the Canadian tar sands will come under renewed assault this week from an increasingly vocal group of shareholders and environmentalists who are planning to turn the forthcoming BP, Shell and Royal Bank of Scotland (RSB) annual meetings into a referendum on these controversial operations.
The Co-operative and the Fair Pensions lobby group are releasing a special briefing paper designed to counter recent statements by the oil companies that sought to justify their involvement in carbon-intensive oil extraction in Alberta on the basis that it was needed to meet rising oil demand.
Friends of the Earth, Platform and other green groups are publishing a new report, Cashing in on Tar Sands — RBS, UK Banks and Canada’s Blood Oil, which claims RBS has provided loans of US$7.5 billion in the past three years to companies carrying out this kind of mining in North America.
There are signs the oil companies and the Canadian government are becoming increasingly concerned about the reputational damage that could be inflicted on them: A special “tar sands day of learning” was held at the headquarters of the Royal Bank of Canada in Toronto on Feb. 1 to bolster the confidence of fellow bankers and investors.
The Co-op’s investor briefing, designed to rally further opposition, warns institutional investors with highly diversified portfolios that allowing BP and Shell to pursue their costly tar sands extraction could undermine their holdings in other areas of the economy.
“The issue for many large investors is not just whether the macroeconomic conditions necessary to ensure the profitability of oil sands production are in place, but whether the continued expansion of oil sands production could aggravate climate change, thereby putting at risk gross domestic product growth and the performance of their portfolio as a whole,” the new document says.
Fair Pensions last week announced the establishment of a new Web tool allowing individual pension holders to lobby their fund managers, who are big investors in BP and Shell. More than 1,200 people have taken advantage of it on www.countingthecost.org.uk.
The Friends of the Earth and Platform report is being released today, on the day a coalition of non-governmental organizations seeks a judicial review against the British Treasury over its willingness to allow RBS to finance companies alleged to be exacerbating climate change and disregarding the human rights of local indigenous peoples. RBS is now largely publicly owned and the non-governmental organizations believe the government could stop it from acting in ways that are counter to its climate-change policies.
Tar sands oil has soared up the investment, political and environmental agenda since the Copenhagen climate change summit highlighted the need for a clampdown on the most carbon-intensive activities that are the biggest threat to global warming.
Shell, a leader in the tar sands business, had shown signs of backtracking in recent months, with new chief executive Peter Voser saying: “We look at them as being developed, but at a much slower pace.”
But the company will still go ahead with plans to increase production by 100,000 barrels a day, which it is said will raise carbon dioxide emissions from its current level of 3.7 million tonnes a year to 5 million by 2015.
BP is more bullish than ever: Chief executive Tony Hayward said it could be getting between 100,000 and 200,000 barrels a day from tar sands by 2015 and was already preparing two US refineries specially to process this kind of crude.
Despite mounting opposition from politicians, as well as some investors and non-governmental organizations, Hayward is convinced: “Canadian heavy oil is going to be a very important part of America’s energy.”
But not if the Co-op and Fair Pensions can help it. They have had a resolution accepted for BP and Shell’s annual general meetings, asking both companies to undertake reviews on the risk of tar sands extraction, with reports to be made to next year’s meetings.
The BP resolution wants details of “assumptions made by the company in deciding to proceed with the Sunrise [tar sands] Project regarding future carbon prices, oil price volatility, demand for oil, anticipated regulation of greenhouse gas emissions and legal and reputational risks arising from local environmental damage and impairment of traditional livelihoods.”
Both BP and Shell insist that they can extract oil from tar sands in a responsible way, with the latter arguing that carbon dioxide emissions can be minimized by using carbon capture and storage (CCS) techniques. Shell says a planned CCS plant in Edmonton, Alberta, would take more than 1 million tonnes a year out of the atmosphere by 2015 and could be expanded in future.
Tar sands, or oil sands, are deposits of sand and clay saturated with bitumen, which is oil in a solid or semi-solid state. The region where they have been found, in the ancient forests of Alberta, is said to cover an area bigger than England.
When the bitumen is close to the surface it is excavated in an opencast mine. The land is cleared and the bitumen-soaked sand is dug out with mechanical shovels and loaded on to trucks to be taken to a separation plant.
BP stresses it does not get involved in such controversial strip-mining, but bringing the oil out from deeper deposits has its own serious problems: It requires power and steam-generating plants that use a lot of energy and water. In some cases, steam has to be injected into wells to encourage the bitumen to flow.
BP claims the method of production used in the Sunrise Project only emits 5 percent more greenhouse gases than commonly imported conventional fuels. But the Co-op says the Jacobs report, which is quoted by the oil company in support of these figures, is “subject to challenge” because it has not been peer-reviewed.
“Peer-reviewed studies and US government studies show that the relative emissions of oil sands are much higher than BP claim,” says the briefing paper, which questions the companies’ assumptions that global oil prices will remain high enough in future to justify the heavy investment costs of bringing oil out of the ground in this way.
Analysts at Deutsche Bank recently pointed out that continuing high oil prices — currently close to US$80 per barrel — could trigger a permanent switch to more efficient oil use and low-carbon alternatives.
“The value of high capex [capital expenditure] intensity, long lead time, currently undeveloped oil such as undeveloped Canadian heavy oil sands ... could be far lower than the market expects,” they say.
AFGHAN CHILD: A court battle is ongoing over if the toddler can stay with Joshua Mast and his wife, who wanted ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’ for her Major Joshua Mast, a US Marine whose adoption of an Afghan war orphan has spurred a years-long legal battle, is to remain on active duty after a three-member panel of Marines on Tuesday found that while he acted in a way unbecoming of an officer to bring home the baby girl, it did not warrant his separation from the military. Lawyers for the Marine Corps argued that Mast abused his position, disregarded orders of his superiors, mishandled classified information and improperly used a government computer in his fight over the child who was found orphaned on the battlefield in rural Afghanistan
STICKING TO DEFENSE: Despite the screening of videos in which they appeared, one of the defendants said they had no memory of the event A court trying a Frenchman charged with drugging his wife and enlisting dozens of strangers to rape her screened videos of the abuse to the public on Friday, to challenge several codefendants who denied knowing she was unconscious during their actions. The judge in the southern city of Avignon had nine videos and several photographs of the abuse of Gisele Pelicot shown in the courtroom and an adjoining public chamber, involving seven of the 50 men accused alongside her husband. Present in the courtroom herself, Gisele Pelicot looked at her telephone during the hour and a half of screenings, while her ex-husband
NEW STORM: investigators dubbed the attacks on US telecoms ‘Salt Typhoon,’ after authorities earlier this year disrupted China’s ‘Flax Typhoon’ hacking group Chinese hackers accessed the networks of US broadband providers and obtained information from systems that the federal government uses for court-authorized wiretapping, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported on Saturday. The networks of Verizon Communications, AT&T and Lumen Technologies, along with other telecoms, were breached by the recently discovered intrusion, the newspaper said, citing people familiar with the matter. The hackers might have held access for months to network infrastructure used by the companies to cooperate with court-authorized US requests for communications data, the report said. The hackers had also accessed other tranches of Internet traffic, it said. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs
EYEING THE US ELECTION: Analysts say that Pyongyang would likely leverage its enlarged nuclear arsenal for concessions after a new US administration is inaugurated North Korean leader Kim Jong-un warned again that he could use nuclear weapons in potential conflicts with South Korea and the US, as he accused them of provoking North Korea and raising animosities on the Korean Peninsula, state media reported yesterday. Kim has issued threats to use nuclear weapons pre-emptively numerous times, but his latest warning came as experts said that North Korea could ramp up hostilities ahead of next month’s US presidential election. In a Monday speech at a university named after him, the Kim Jong-un National Defense University, he said that North Korea “will without hesitation use all its attack
RSS