Afghan presidential challenger Abdullah Abdullah’s decision to quit an election run-off will not complicate US President Barack Obama’s deliberations on war strategy, senior US officials said.
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made clear the Obama administration would work with Afghan President Hamid Karzai if he remains Afghanistan’s leader, as seems all but certain.
“It is now a matter for the Afghan authorities to decide on a way ahead that brings this electoral process to a conclusion in line with the Afghan constitution,” Clinton said in a statement on Sunday.
“We will support the next president and the people of Afghanistan, who seek and deserve a better future,” she said.
As Obama weighs whether to approve a request from his top commander in Afghanistan for a 40,000 increase in US troops, Abdullah’s exit from the Nov. 7 vote threatened to raise doubts about the legitimacy of Karzai’s government.
The war in Afghanistan has become unpopular with the US public, with violence at the worst levels since US-backed Afghan forces ousted the Taliban in 2001.
Many of Obama’s Democratic allies in Congress are wary of a troop increase, while Republicans accuse him of dragging out the deliberations over strategy. Some question whether Washington has a credible partner to work with in the Afghan government.
Karzai’s camp ruled out a coalition with Abdullah, dashing hopes of a way out of the impasse.
Still unclear is whether the Nov. 7 run-off would go ahead with Karzai as the only candidate, given the expense involved in the vote and potential security risks.
Afghan election officials said the run-off would take place and US officials said it was up to Kabul to decide.
“We’re going to deal with the government that is there and obviously there are issues we need to discuss, such as reducing the high level of corruption there,” senior Obama adviser David Axelrod told the CBS program Face the Nation.
Axelrod said Abdullah “made a political decision” to quit the run-off and it was likely he would have been defeated.
In her statement, Clinton urged Abdullah to “stay engaged” and work for peace in Afghanistan.
Abdullah left the door open for future discussions but said no deals had been struck in return for his withdrawal, seen by diplomats as one way to spare the country more uncertainty that discredits the government and can only aid the insurgency.
“This decision has not been made in return for anything or for anybody,” Abdullah said.
His voice faltering and his eyes welling with tears, Abdullah told hundreds of supporters, including white-bearded tribal elders, in a giant tent used for grand assemblies that he had reached the decision “in the interests of the nation.”
“As far as I’m concerned, the decision I have reached is not to participate,” he later told reporters. “I have strong, strong reservations about the credibility of the process.”
Karzai had been favored to win the run-off after getting more votes in an Aug. 20 first round marred by fraud. His campaign team said the run-off would go ahead.
“Dr Abdullah’s decision has disappointed us,” Karzai said in a statement, adding his team would accept whatever rulings were made by authorities.
The Taliban, which have vowed to disrupt the polls again, said Abdullah’s withdrawal made no difference.
“There will be no change of policy as far as we are concerned,” Taliban spokesman Qari Mohammad Yousuf said by telephone from an undisclosed location.
A strong and legitimate Afghan government is central to the US strategy to quell rising Taliban violence. Obama had already delayed the strategy decision on sending extra troops to await the election result.
Abdullah said he quit because demands he had sought from the government and election authorities, including the sacking of Afghanistan’s top election official, had not been met.
DEBT BREAK: Friedrich Merz has vowed to do ‘whatever it takes’ to free up more money for defense and infrastructure at a time of growing geopolitical uncertainty Germany’s likely next leader Friedrich Merz was set yesterday to defend his unprecedented plans to massively ramp up defense and infrastructure spending in the Bundestag as lawmakers begin debating the proposals. Merz unveiled the plans last week, vowing his center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU)/Christian Social Union (CSU) bloc and the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) — in talks to form a coalition after last month’s elections — would quickly push them through before the end of the current legislature. Fraying Europe-US ties under US President Donald Trump have fueled calls for Germany, long dependent on the US security umbrella, to quickly
RARE EVENT: While some cultures have a negative view of eclipses, others see them as a chance to show how people can work together, a scientist said Stargazers across a swathe of the world marveled at a dramatic red “Blood Moon” during a rare total lunar eclipse in the early hours of yesterday morning. The celestial spectacle was visible in the Americas and Pacific and Atlantic oceans, as well as in the westernmost parts of Europe and Africa. The phenomenon happens when the sun, Earth and moon line up, causing our planet to cast a giant shadow across its satellite. But as the Earth’s shadow crept across the moon, it did not entirely blot out its white glow — instead the moon glowed a reddish color. This is because the
Romania’s electoral commission on Saturday excluded a second far-right hopeful, Diana Sosoaca, from May’s presidential election, amid rising tension in the run-up to the May rerun of the poll. Earlier this month, Romania’s Central Electoral Bureau barred Calin Georgescu, an independent who was polling at about 40 percent ahead of the rerun election. Georgescu, a fierce EU and NATO critic, shot to prominence in November last year when he unexpectedly topped a first round of presidential voting. However, Romania’s constitutional court annulled the election after claims of Russian interference and a “massive” social media promotion in his favor. On Saturday, an electoral commission statement
Chinese authorities increased pressure on CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd over its plan to sell its Panama ports stake by sharing a second newspaper commentary attacking the deal. The Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office on Saturday reposted a commentary originally published in Ta Kung Pao, saying the planned sale of the ports by the Hong Kong company had triggered deep concerns among Chinese people and questioned whether the deal was harming China and aiding evil. “Why were so many important ports transferred to ill-intentioned US forces so easily? What kind of political calculations are hidden in the so-called commercial behavior on the
RSS