Using sweeping security codes passed after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) highest court convicted a US citizen on Monday on terrorism-related charges amid claims that torture was used to extract his confession.
The four-month trial of Naji Hamdan was also carried out without making public details of the accusations — showing the tight lid on information over security matters in a nation that promotes itself as the West’s foothold in the Gulf.
Anti-terrorism laws in the Emirates, passed in the aftermath of the 2001 US terrorist attacks, have often been expanded to muzzle political dissent and have drawn sharp criticism from international rights groups.
The court sentenced Hamdan, an American of Lebanese origin, to 18 months in prison after facing three terrorism-related charges, including having ties to an al-Qaeda group in Iraq. However, Hamdan — who denied the allegations — should be freed soon because the sentence takes into account the time he spent in custody since his arrest last year.
Once he serves his time, Hamdan is to be deported from the country.
Hamdan’s lawyer, Abdul Khader al-Haithami, claimed in an earlier hearing that his client suffered torture and threats in detention and was forced to sign a confession “to whatever they wanted to hear.”
The case is a “classic example” of problems associated with state security and terrorism-related trials around the region, said Deborah Manning, a senior legal officer with Al Karama, a Geneva-based and Arab world-focused human rights organization.
“Serious allegations are often not backed by proper evidence,” Manning said. “Heavy reliance on secret information severely prejudices the proper defense.”
In his verdict, chief justice Khalifa al-Muhairi gave no details on his decision such as whether the 43-year-old Hamdan was convicted of all three charges. There are no appeals to verdicts by the UAE’s Federal Supreme Court.
“I’m disappointed because I was not acquitted,” Hamdan said as he was led away by security forces after the verdict.
Rights groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), also have accused US authorities of pushing the case in the Emirates because they lacked enough evidence for US courts. The ACLU asked a US court to press for a halt to the case, but a US judge ruled in August that there was no authority to interfere in a foreign criminal prosecution.
“The security system in the UAE is very powerful,” said Abduldkhadi al-Khawaja, a Bahrain-based coordinator for Frontline, an international group that protects human rights activists. “Their activities are not related only to terrorism, but any kind of political activism, including defending human rights.”
Political parties are not allowed in the UAE and associations for the promotion of civil liberties and human rights are closely controlled. Leading lawyers, university professors and activists have been detained and questioned by security services, rights groups say. Some have been fired from their jobs, others have been banned from public life after they were released from detention without ever being charged with any crime.
Hamdan said he was not politically active after he moved with his family back to the Middle East in 2006 after living in the US for almost 20 years. He was an active member of the Islamic community in the Los Angeles area, where he ran a successful auto parts business.
He said the FBI began questioning him about whether he had terrorist ties in 1999. He was never charged with any crime in the US.
He was arrested in the UAE in August last year and charged in June with supporting terrorism, working with terrorist organizations and being a member of a terrorist group. After his arrest, he wrote a note to a US diplomat saying he was subjected to beatings, threats to his family and verbal abuse.
China has possibly committed “genocide” in its treatment of Uighurs and other minority Muslims in its western region of Xinjiang, the US Congressional-Executive Commission on China said in a report on Thursday. The bipartisan commission said that new evidence had last year emerged that “crimes against humanity — and possibly genocide — are occurring” in Xinjiang. It also accused China of harassing Uighurs in the US. China has been widely condemned for setting up complexes in Xinjiang that it describes as “vocational training centers” to stamp out extremism and give people new skills, which others have called concentration camps. The UN says that
A racing pigeon has survived an extraordinary 13,000km Pacific Ocean crossing from the US to find a new home in Australia. Now authorities consider the bird a quarantine risk and plan to kill it. Kevin Celli-Bird yesterday said he discovered that the exhausted bird that arrived in his Melbourne backyard on Dec. 26 last year had disappeared from a race in the US state of Oregon on Oct. 29. Experts suspect the pigeon that Celli-Bird has named Joe — after US president-elect Joe Biden — hitched a ride on a cargo ship to cross the Pacific. Joe’s feat has attracted the attention
Australian scientists have raised questions over the efficacy of the AstraZeneca and University of Oxford COVID-19 vaccine in establishing herd immunity, calling for a pause on its widespread rollout as the country recorded one new case of the virus yesterday. Opposition to the vaccine casts a cloud over Australia’s immunization plans, with 53 million doses of the AstraZeneca jab already on hand. “The question is really whether it is able to provide herd immunity. We are playing a long game here. We don’t know how long that will take,” Australian and New Zealand Society for Immunology president Stephen Turner said. Turner added
The Polish Supreme Court on Friday quashed a lower court’s green light for the extradition of a businessman to China for alleged fraud, a charge he has denied, saying that he is being targeted for supporting Falun Gong. Polish authorities took Chinese-born Swedish citizen Li Zhihui, now 53, into custody in 2019 on an international warrant issued by China for alleged non-payment in a business deal, Krzysztof Kitajgrodzki, his Polish lawyer, told reporters. Following the Supreme Court ruling, the case would return to a lower appellate court for review. Kitajgrodzki told reporters that it was still not a given that his client