Climate change is causing 300,000 deaths a year and is affecting 300 million people, according to the first comprehensive study of the human impact of global warming.
The study projects that increasingly severe heatwaves, floods, storms and forest fires will be responsible for as many as 500,000 deaths a year by 2030, making it the greatest humanitarian challenge the world faces.
Climate change is also causing economic losses, amounting to more than US$125 billion a year — more than all the present world aid. The report comes from former UN secretary-general Kofi Annan’s think tank, the Global Humanitarian Forum. By 2030, the report says, climate change could cost US$600bn a year.
Writing in yesterday’s edition of the London-based Guardian newspaper, Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the UN intergovernmental panel on climate change, says: “The scale of devastation is so great that it is hard to believe the truth behind it, or how it is possible that so many people remain ignorant of this crisis.”
Civil unrest may also increase because of weather-related events, the report says: “Four billion people are vulnerable now and 500 million are now at extreme risk. Weather-related disasters ... bring hunger, disease, poverty and lost livelihoods. They pose a threat to social and political stability.”
If emissions are not brought under control within 25 years, the report states that:
• 310 million more people will suffer adverse health consequences related to temperature increases.
• 20 million more will fall into poverty.
• 75 million more will be displaced.
The study also compares, for the first time, the number of people affected by climate change in rich and poor countries. Nearly 98 percent of people seriously affected, 99 percent of all deaths from weather-related disasters and 90 percent of the total economic losses are borne by developing countries. The populations most at risk are in sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, south Asia and small Pacific island states.
But of the 12 countries considered least at risk, including Britain, all but one are industrially developed. Together they have made nearly US$72 billion available to adapt themselves to climate change but have pledged only US$400 million to help poor countries.
“This is less than one state in Germany is spending on improving its flood defenses,” the report said.
Annan, who launched the report in London on Friday, said: “The world is at a crossroads. We can no longer afford to ignore the human impact of climate change. This is a call to the negotiators to come to the most ambitious agreement ever negotiated or to continue to accept mass starvation, mass sickness and mass migration on an ever growing scale.”
Annan blamed politicians for the impasse in negotiations and widespread ignorance in many countries.
“Weak leadership, as evident today, is alarming. If leaders cannot assume responsibility they will fail humanity. Agreement is in the interests of every human,” he said.
On Friday, Todd Stern, US President Barack Obama’s special envoy on climate change, said the US planned emission cuts of 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and up to 80 percent cuts by 2050.
“The proposed cuts are around the same as the EU. That would be hard policy, with a cap that gets progressively higher from 2012,” he said.
But he accepted poor countries needed money to adapt.
“We have requested US$300 million for international adaptation in our budget. There is no money on the table yet, as things have not gelled yet,” he said.
Barbara Stocking, head of Oxfam, said: “Adaptation efforts need to be scaled up. The world’s poorest are the hardest hit, but they have done the least to cause it.”
“Climate change is life or death. It is the new global battlefield,” Nobel peace prizewinner Wangari Maathai told the Guardian. “It is being presented as if it is the problem of the developed world. But it’s the developed world that has precipitated global warming.”
The report is based on data provided by the World Bank, the WHO, the UN, the Potsdam Institute and others, including top insurance companies and Oxfam. The authors accept the estimates carry uncertainties and could be higher or lower. But the paper was reviewed by 10 leading experts including Pachauri, Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University and Potsdam’s John Schellnhuber.
Pachauri called it “the most plausible possible estimate of the human impacts of climate change today.”
On Thursday, 20 Nobel prize winners, including Wangari Maathai, Wole Soyinka and US energy secretary Steven Chu, called for a global deal on climate change “that matches the scale and urgency of the human, ecological and economic crises facing the world today.”
DIPLOMATIC THAW: The Canadian prime minister’s China visit and improved Beijing-Ottawa ties raised lawyer Zhang Dongshuo’s hopes for a positive outcome in the retrial China has overturned the death sentence of Canadian Robert Schellenberg, a Canadian official said on Friday, in a possible sign of a diplomatic thaw as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney seeks to boost trade ties with Beijing. Schellenberg’s lawyer, Zhang Dongshuo (張東碩), yesterday confirmed China’s Supreme People’s Court struck down the sentence. Schellenberg was detained on drug charges in 2014 before China-Canada ties nosedived following the 2018 arrest in Vancouver of Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou (孟晚舟). That arrest infuriated Beijing, which detained two Canadians — Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig — on espionage charges that Ottawa condemned as retaliatory. In January
Two medieval fortresses face each other across the Narva River separating Estonia from Russia on Europe’s eastern edge. Once a symbol of cooperation, the “Friendship Bridge” connecting the two snow-covered banks has been reinforced with rows of razor wire and “dragon’s teeth” anti-tank obstacles on the Estonian side. “The name is kind of ironic,” regional border chief Eerik Purgel said. Some fear the border town of more than 50,0000 people — a mixture of Estonians, Russians and people left stateless after the fall of the Soviet Union — could be Russian President Vladimir Putin’s next target. On the Estonian side of the bridge,
Jeremiah Kithinji had never touched a computer before he finished high school. A decade later, he is teaching robotics, and even took a team of rural Kenyans to the World Robotics Olympiad in Singapore. In a classroom in Laikipia County — a sparsely populated grasslands region of northern Kenya known for its rhinos and cheetahs — pupils are busy snapping together wheels, motors and sensors to assemble a robot. Guiding them is Kithinji, 27, who runs a string of robotics clubs in the area that have taken some of his pupils far beyond the rural landscapes outside. In November, he took a team
SHOW OF SUPPORT: The move showed that aggression toward Greenland is a question for Europe and Canada, and the consequences are global, not just Danish, experts said Canada and France, which adamantly oppose US President Donald Trump’s wish to control Greenland, were to open consulates in the Danish autonomous territory’s capital yesterday, in a strong show of support for the local government. Since returning to the White House last year, Trump has repeatedly insisted that Washington needs to control the strategic, mineral-rich Arctic island for security reasons. Trump last month backed off his threats to seize Greenland after saying he had struck a “framework” deal with NATO chief Mark Rutte to ensure greater US influence. A US-Denmark-Greenland working group has been established to discuss ways to meet Washington’s security concerns