Belarusian opposition parties were left with no seats in parliament yesterday, with most results declared as key elections cast doubt on the ex-Soviet state’s bid for reconciliation with the West.
The Central Elections Commission said results for 99 of the 110 seats showed no gains for opponents of pro-Russian Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, dubbed “Europe’s last dictator” by Washington.
“The 99 elected candidates support the current authorities,” commission head Lidia Yermoshina said on Sunday. “There is no opponent among them.”
PHOTO: AFP
Full results were due later yesterday, she said.
Hundreds gathered on Sunday in the center of the capital Minsk to condemn the polls as a “farce” and call for the ouster of Lukashenko, who they criticized for keeping the country deep in Moscow’s orbit.
A sweep by pro-government parties would likely be read as a snub in Washington and Brussels, which have offered better ties with the former Soviet republic if the elections show significant improvements on earlier polls.
Lukashenko, who has ruled this former Soviet republic wedged between Russia and the EU for 14 years, on Sunday hit out at opposition groups for taking “outside” funding.
“A real, constructive opposition is always needed ... but not an opposition fed and financed 100 percent from outside,” he told journalists.
The West has offered to ease sanctions, give economic aid and lift a travel ban on Belarusian leaders if Sunday’s poll shows signs of progress in a country that is also a key transit route for Russian gas exports.
Young protesters gathered in central Minsk after polls closed, holding banners declaring “no to farce,” “dictatorship should go to the dustbin of history,” and “no to Russian military bases.”
They also waved flags of the EU and orange ones mirroring those used in the pro-Western Orange Revolution in neighboring Ukraine in 2004.
Only a few uniformed police could be seen surrounding the opposition rally, in stark contrast to previous post-election protests in Belarus
Earlier, a coalition of anti-Lukashenko groups criticized the election as undemocratic.
“It is clear these elections cannot be recognized as honest and fair under any criteria. We do not recognize the results,” Anatoly Lebedko, the leader of the opposition United Citizen Party, told reporters.
The voter turnout was 75.3 percent, the latest figures from the election commission said. That included more than a quarter of the electorate who cast ballots from last Tuesday through Saturday.
The opposition has criticized the early voting system as giving authorities an easy way to commit fraud, since it was not subject to complete independent monitoring.
Paris-based media watchdog Reporters Without Borders complained that Lukashenko’s critics were ignored in state-controlled media during campaigning — a view shared by the demonstrators in Minsk’s October Square.
Thousands had camped out in the same location in March 2006 to protest the results of a presidential vote widely seen as rigged.
Of the 263 candidates fighting for the 110 seats in the lower house of parliament, only 70 are from the United Democratic Forces, a coalition of opposition parties, while the rest are Lukashenko loyalists.
In the country’s last parliamentary elections in 2004, no opposition candidates won a place in the lower house.
Election monitors from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe were to give their appraisal of the poll later yesterday.
Final results were expected to be confirmed on Friday.
DEBT BREAK: Friedrich Merz has vowed to do ‘whatever it takes’ to free up more money for defense and infrastructure at a time of growing geopolitical uncertainty Germany’s likely next leader Friedrich Merz was set yesterday to defend his unprecedented plans to massively ramp up defense and infrastructure spending in the Bundestag as lawmakers begin debating the proposals. Merz unveiled the plans last week, vowing his center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU)/Christian Social Union (CSU) bloc and the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) — in talks to form a coalition after last month’s elections — would quickly push them through before the end of the current legislature. Fraying Europe-US ties under US President Donald Trump have fueled calls for Germany, long dependent on the US security umbrella, to quickly
RARE EVENT: While some cultures have a negative view of eclipses, others see them as a chance to show how people can work together, a scientist said Stargazers across a swathe of the world marveled at a dramatic red “Blood Moon” during a rare total lunar eclipse in the early hours of yesterday morning. The celestial spectacle was visible in the Americas and Pacific and Atlantic oceans, as well as in the westernmost parts of Europe and Africa. The phenomenon happens when the sun, Earth and moon line up, causing our planet to cast a giant shadow across its satellite. But as the Earth’s shadow crept across the moon, it did not entirely blot out its white glow — instead the moon glowed a reddish color. This is because the
Romania’s electoral commission on Saturday excluded a second far-right hopeful, Diana Sosoaca, from May’s presidential election, amid rising tension in the run-up to the May rerun of the poll. Earlier this month, Romania’s Central Electoral Bureau barred Calin Georgescu, an independent who was polling at about 40 percent ahead of the rerun election. Georgescu, a fierce EU and NATO critic, shot to prominence in November last year when he unexpectedly topped a first round of presidential voting. However, Romania’s constitutional court annulled the election after claims of Russian interference and a “massive” social media promotion in his favor. On Saturday, an electoral commission statement
Chinese authorities increased pressure on CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd over its plan to sell its Panama ports stake by sharing a second newspaper commentary attacking the deal. The Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office on Saturday reposted a commentary originally published in Ta Kung Pao, saying the planned sale of the ports by the Hong Kong company had triggered deep concerns among Chinese people and questioned whether the deal was harming China and aiding evil. “Why were so many important ports transferred to ill-intentioned US forces so easily? What kind of political calculations are hidden in the so-called commercial behavior on the