US President George W. Bush highlighted civilian reconstruction work that has improved daily life in Afghanistan despite extremists attacks that have made this the most violent year since the US-led invasion that threw out the hardline Taliban regime in 2001.
During his session with Afghan President Hamid Karzai on Friday, Bush said work being done by more than two dozen reconstruction teams is a central part of the counterinsurgency strategy in the nation.
“No question it’s difficult, but if you listen to the people who are actually on the ground working with the citizens of Afghanistan on matters such as agriculture, or education, or infrastructure, you’ll understand why I said that there is progress and promise and hope,” Bush said.
The two leaders are trying to quell violence being waged by Taliban and al-Qaeda extremists hiding in the border regions of Pakistan. Also, US-Afghan relations have been strained by the deaths of Afghan civilians in bombing raids that Karzai says are undermining the credibility of the international community’s partnership with the Afghan people.
Still, Karzai praised the work of reconstruction teams, saying Afghanistan has made more progress in the past six or seven years than it would have been able to make on its own in 50 or 60 years.
“Life is better,” Karzai said. “Of course we have challenges, and the challenges will continue to face us as we move ahead. The success is already there; the picture will be completed.”
The meeting was likely Karzai’s last with Bush at the White House. Karzai thanked Bush for his commitment to his country and for the president’s patience in coping with the nation’s many problems.
“I’ve yelled at times,” Karzai said, prompting a laugh from Bush. “I’ve been angry at times. But you’ve always been smiling and generous, and just so nice.”
During the meeting, Bush and Karzai had a videoconference with US provincial reconstruction team leaders, representatives from the National Guard’s agriculture development team and Afghan governors in two provinces in eastern Afghanistan. Twenty-six reconstruction teams now operate in Afghanistan, 12 led by the US and 14 directed by NATO allies and coalition partners.
Lieutenant Colonel Frank Sturek, branch chief for Afghan policy at the Joint Chiefs of Staff who worked with provisional reconstruction teams in two provinces in southeast Afghanistan in 2006, recounted how reconstruction team workers helped to open schools for children who had not been to class in two years.
“That’s only about 8,000 to 10,000 kids going to school, which is not a big deal here in the US, but to the Afghans in that area, it was huge,” Sturek said after the meeting. “The country is so poor and the country is in such need, and wants to grow, that what we consider small improvements are really strategic successes over there.”
Early this week, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said the Pentagon may be able to send thousands more combat troops to Afghanistan starting in the spring, but he also pointedly cautioned against overdoing a military buildup in a country that long has resisted the presence of foreign forces. About 31,000 US troops are in Afghanistan and roughly an equal number of other coalition troops.
At least 120 US troops and 104 from other NATO nations have died in Afghanistan this year, both record numbers. Overall, more than 4,500 people, mostly militants, have died in attacks this year.
Romania’s electoral commission on Saturday excluded a second far-right hopeful, Diana Sosoaca, from May’s presidential election, amid rising tension in the run-up to the May rerun of the poll. Earlier this month, Romania’s Central Electoral Bureau barred Calin Georgescu, an independent who was polling at about 40 percent ahead of the rerun election. Georgescu, a fierce EU and NATO critic, shot to prominence in November last year when he unexpectedly topped a first round of presidential voting. However, Romania’s constitutional court annulled the election after claims of Russian interference and a “massive” social media promotion in his favor. On Saturday, an electoral commission statement
Chinese authorities increased pressure on CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd over its plan to sell its Panama ports stake by sharing a second newspaper commentary attacking the deal. The Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office on Saturday reposted a commentary originally published in Ta Kung Pao, saying the planned sale of the ports by the Hong Kong company had triggered deep concerns among Chinese people and questioned whether the deal was harming China and aiding evil. “Why were so many important ports transferred to ill-intentioned US forces so easily? What kind of political calculations are hidden in the so-called commercial behavior on the
‘DOWNSIZE’: The Trump administration has initiated sweeping cuts to US government-funded media outlets in a move critics said could undermine the US’ global influence US President Donald Trump’s administration on Saturday began making deep cuts to Voice of America (VOA) and other government-run, pro-democracy programming, with the organization’s director saying all VOA employees have been put on leave. On Friday night, shortly after the US Congress passed its latest funding bill, Trump directed his administration to reduce the functions of several agencies to the minimum required by law. That included the US Agency for Global Media, which houses Voice of America, Radio Free Europe and Asia and Radio Marti, which beams Spanish-language news into Cuba. On Saturday morning, Kari Lake, a former Arizona gubernatorial and US
Indonesia’s parliament yesterday amended a law to allow members of the military to hold more government roles, despite criticisms that it would expand the armed forces’ role in civilian affairs. The revision to the armed forces law, pushed mainly by Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s coalition, was aimed at expanding the military’s role beyond defense in a country long influenced by its armed forces. The amendment has sparked fears of a return to the era of former Indonesian president Suharto, who ex-general Prabowo once served and who used military figures to crack down on dissent. “Now it’s the time for us to ask the