The Palestinians and Israelis called on Tuesday for stepped up international support to reach a peace settlement by the end of the year, blaming each other for the recent upsurge in violence but agreeing that the current talks are the only route to end the decades-long conflict.
In separate speeches to the Security Council, Palestinian UN observer Riyad Mansour and Israeli Ambassador to the UN Dan Gillerman said their leaders' agreement in November to reach a peace settlement this year needs greater backing from the international community if it is to work.
Mansour said 110 days have passed since the US-hosted meeting in Annapolis, Maryland, where Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas reached their agreement, but "instead of positive changes, we are seeing negative things on the ground."
Russia has offered to host a follow-up conference in Moscow and Mansour said such a meeting "is extremely needed and urgent" to revive the peace process. He said there was some discussion of the meeting taking place in June.
Gillerman said suspending the ongoing Olmert-Abbas talks would only play into the hands of extremists who want "to see our failure."
"Israel knows it cannot accomplish this alone," he said. "It needs the support of like-minded moderate leaders in the region that understand the threat posed by the extremists, not just to us but to them and to the world, and are willing to do what it takes."
Gillerman asked countries to demonstrate collective support for the negotiations toward a lasting peace for the region.
"This is the mandate of the international community. This is its calling. This is its duty," he said. "This collective resolve must be shown first and foremost by this council."
Gillerman did not mention a follow-up conference in Moscow. Israel is thought to be unenthusiastic about the meeting, partly because the focus would be on an Israeli-Palestinian settlement and not on Israel's dispute with Syria over the Golan Heights, which Russia might want on the agenda.
Showcasing phallus-shaped portable shrines and pink penis candies, Japan’s annual fertility festival yesterday teemed with tourists, couples and families elated by its open display of sex. The spring Kanamara Matsuri near Tokyo features colorfully dressed worshipers carrying a trio of giant phallic-shaped objects as they parade through the street with glee. The festival, as legend has it, honors a local blacksmith in the Edo Period (1603-1868) who forged an iron dildo to break the teeth of a sharp-toothed demon inhabiting a woman’s vagina that had been castrating young men on their wedding nights. A 1m black steel phallus sits in the courtyard of
JAN. 1 CLAUSE: As military service is voluntary, applications for permission to stay abroad for over three months for men up to age 45 must, in principle, be granted A little-noticed clause in sweeping changes to Germany’s military service policy has triggered an uproar after it emerged that the law requires men aged up to 45 to get permission from the armed forces before any significant stay abroad, even in peacetime. The legislation, which went into effect on Jan. 1 aims to bolster the military and demands all 18-year-old men fill out a questionnaire to gauge their suitability to serve in the armed forces, but stops short of conscription. If the “modernized” model fails to pull in enough recruits, parliament will be compelled to discuss the reintroduction of compulsory service, German
Filipino farmers like Romeo Wagayan have been left with little choice but to let their vegetables rot in the field rather than sell them at a loss, as rising oil prices linked to the Iran war drive up the cost of harvesting, labor and transport. “There’s nothing we can do,” said Wagayan, a 57-year old vegetable farmer in the northern Philippine province of Benguet. “If we harvest it, our losses only increase because of labor, transportation and packing costs. We don’t earn anything from it. That’s why we decided not to harvest at all,” he said. Soaring costs caused by the Middle East
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s officially declared wealth is fairly modest: some savings and a jointly owned villa in Budapest. However, voters in what Transparency International deems the EU’s most corrupt country believe otherwise — and they might make Orban pay in a general election this Sunday that could spell an end to his 16-year rule. The wealth amassed by Orban’s inner circle is fueling the increasingly palpable frustration of a population grappling with sluggish growth, high inflation and worsening public services. “The government’s communication machine worked well as long as our economic situation remained relatively good,” said Zoltan Ranschburg, a political analyst
RSS