For nearly two weeks, the New York Times has been defending a political advertisement that critics say was an unfair shot at the US commander in Iraq.
But I think the ad violated the Times' own written standards, and the paper now says that the advertiser got a price break it was not entitled to.
On Monday, Sept. 10, the day General David Petraeus came before Congress to warn against a rapid withdrawal of troops, the Times carried a full-page ad attacking his truthfulness.
Under the provocative headline "General Petraeus or General Betray Us?" the ad, purchased by the liberal activist group MoveOn.org, charged that the highly decorated Petraeus was "constantly at war with the facts" in giving upbeat assessments of progress and refusing to acknowledge that Iraq is "mired in an unwinnable religious civil war."
"Today, before Congress and before the American people, General Petraeus is likely to become General Betray Us," MoveOn.org declared.
The ad infuriated conservatives, dismayed many Democrats and ignited charges that the liberal Times aided its friends at MoveOn.org with a steep discount in the price paid to publish its message, which might amount to an illegal contribution to a political action committee.
In more than 4,000 e-mails, people around the country raged at the Times with words like "despicable," "disgrace" and "treason."
US President George W. Bush called the ad "disgusting."
The Senate, controlled by Democrats, voted overwhelmingly to condemn the ad.
The American Conservative Union filed a formal complaint with the Federal Election Commission against the New York Times Co and MoveOn.org. FreedomsWatch.org, a group recently formed to support the war, asked me to investigate because it said it wasn't offered the same terms for a response ad that MoveOn.org got.
Did MoveOn.org get favored treatment from the Times? And was the ad outside the bounds of acceptable political discourse?
The answer to the first question is that MoveOn.org paid what is known in the newspaper industry as a standby rate of US$64,575 that it should not have received under Times policies.
The group should have paid US$142,083. The Times had maintained for a week that the standby rate was appropriate, but a company spokeswoman told me on Thursday afternoon that an ad sales representative made a mistake.
The answer to the second question is that the ad appears to fly in the face of an internal advertising acceptability manual that says, "We do not accept opinion advertisements that are attacks of a personal nature."
Steph Jespersen, the executive who approved the ad, said that, while it was "rough," he regarded it as a comment on a public official's management of his office and therefore acceptable speech for the Times to print.
By the end of last week the ad appeared to have backfired on both MoveOn.org and fellow opponents of the war in Iraq -- and on the Times.
PHISHING: The con might appear convincing, as the scam e-mails can coincide with genuine messages from Apple saying you have run out of storage For a while you have been getting messages from Apple saying “your iCloud storage is full.” They say you have exceeded your storage plan, so documents are no longer being backed up, and photos you take are not being uploaded. You have been resisting Apple’s efforts to get you to pay a minimum of £0.99 (US$1.33) a month for more storage, but it seems that you cannot keep putting off the inevitable: You have received an e-mail which says your iCloud account has been blocked, and your photos and videos would be deleted very soon. To keep them you need
For two decades, researchers observed members of the Ngogo chimpanzee group of Kibale National Park in Uganda spend their days eating fruits and leaves, resting, traveling and grooming in their tropical rainforest abode, but this stable community then fractured and descended into years of deadly violence. The researchers are now describing the first clearly documented example of a group of wild chimpanzees splitting into two separate factions, with one launching a series of coordinated attacks against the other. Adult males and infants were targeted, with 28 deaths. “Biting, pounding the victim with their hands, dragging them, kicking them — mostly adult males,
The Israeli military has demolished entire villages as part of its invasion of south Lebanon, rigging homes with explosives and razing them to the ground in massive remote detonations. The Guardian reviewed three videos posted by the Israeli military and on social media, which showed Israel carrying out mass detonations in the villages of Taybeh, Naqoura and Deir Seryan along the Israel-Lebanon border. Lebanese media has reported more mass detonations in other border villages, but satellite imagery was not readily available to verify these claims. The demolitions came after Israeli Minister of Defense Israel Katz called for the destruction of
SUPERFAN: The Japanese PM played keyboard in a Deep Purple tribute band in middle school and then switched to drums at university, she told the British rock band Legendary British rock band Deep Purple yesterday made Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s day with a brief visit to their high-profile superfan as they returned to the nation they first toured more than half a century ago. Takaichi’s reputation as an amateur drummer, and a fan of hard rock and heavy metal has been well documented, and she has referred to Deep Purple as one of her favorite bands along with the likes of Black Sabbath and Iron Maiden. “You are my god,” a giddy Takaichi said in English to Deep Purple drummer Ian Paice, presenting him with a set of made-in-Japan