If the US government does not bring charges against former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein relatively soon, it will be technically required, because of his prisoner-of-war status, to release him after the restoration of limited sovereignty, officials with human rights and aid groups said on Monday.
None of the officials were advocating Saddam's release, and they said they want him to stand trial. But they also said that since the US insists the occupation is formally ending on June 30, when limited powers will be handed to the interim Iraqi government, the Geneva Conventions require that the Americans must, in theory, bring charges against prisoners of war or release them.
"We're not making any ultimatums or calls for release," Antonella Notari, chief spokeswoman of the International Committee of the Red Cross, told reporters in Geneva on Monday. "What we're saying is: `Saddam Hussein, as far as we understand today, is a POW, prisoner of war, protected by the third Geneva Convention as all prisoners of war are.'"
PHOTO: AFP
"In theory, when a war ends and when an occupation ends, the detaining force has to release prisoners of war or civilian detainees if there are no reasons for holding them," Notari said.
But she added that a prisoner of war who is suspected of committing criminal acts should be prosecuted and tried rather than simply released.
In an interview on the Qatar-based al-Jazeera television channel on Monday, Iraq's interim prime minister, Iyad Allawi, said the US would hand over Saddam and other regime leaders for trial within two weeks.
The State Department said Monday that the US would negotiate terms with the Iraqi interim government for holding prisoners who, like Saddam, are deemed to be threats.
Wilder Tayler, the legal director for Human Rights Watch, echoed Notari's statement that, in theory, prisoners of war should be released at the end of a conflict or occupation if they are not charged with any crimes.
"I wouldn't say there is much time for retaining somebody after that," he said.
But several technical issues can shift that rule. For one thing, the Geneva Conventions allow some room for practicality, so there is leeway to hold someone for a short time if that time is required for charges to be brought against the prisoner, he said.
In the case of Iraq, the question also arises of whether the occupation will actually end on June 30. In crucial matters, such as oversight of the armed forces, Iraq will not have true sovereignty. One could interpret Iraq's limited powers as an indication that the occupation has not ended, Tayler said.
"The technical issue is, at the moment the US transfers sovereignty, we will have to see how sovereignty works out, to be fair," he added.
Furthermore, depending on the level of violence and military action in the country, one could also argue that an international armed conflict still exists.
The main problem with using those arguments to hold onto prisoners of war is that both the Bush administration and the Iraqi government insist that Iraq will actually have full sovereignty on June 30. That actually undermines one possible reason for holding onto prisoners of war like Saddam, Tayler said. He added that, since there is no realistic chance of Saddam being released, the US should charge him soon.
"He was such a monstrosity," Tayler said. "Letting go of him is not a possibility."
When Saddam was discovered in his hidden bunker in northern Iraq in December, many Iraqis clamored for him to be tried in this country and by its citizens.
AFGHAN CHILD: A court battle is ongoing over if the toddler can stay with Joshua Mast and his wife, who wanted ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’ for her Major Joshua Mast, a US Marine whose adoption of an Afghan war orphan has spurred a years-long legal battle, is to remain on active duty after a three-member panel of Marines on Tuesday found that while he acted in a way unbecoming of an officer to bring home the baby girl, it did not warrant his separation from the military. Lawyers for the Marine Corps argued that Mast abused his position, disregarded orders of his superiors, mishandled classified information and improperly used a government computer in his fight over the child who was found orphaned on the battlefield in rural Afghanistan
STICKING TO DEFENSE: Despite the screening of videos in which they appeared, one of the defendants said they had no memory of the event A court trying a Frenchman charged with drugging his wife and enlisting dozens of strangers to rape her screened videos of the abuse to the public on Friday, to challenge several codefendants who denied knowing she was unconscious during their actions. The judge in the southern city of Avignon had nine videos and several photographs of the abuse of Gisele Pelicot shown in the courtroom and an adjoining public chamber, involving seven of the 50 men accused alongside her husband. Present in the courtroom herself, Gisele Pelicot looked at her telephone during the hour and a half of screenings, while her ex-husband
NEW STORM: investigators dubbed the attacks on US telecoms ‘Salt Typhoon,’ after authorities earlier this year disrupted China’s ‘Flax Typhoon’ hacking group Chinese hackers accessed the networks of US broadband providers and obtained information from systems that the federal government uses for court-authorized wiretapping, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported on Saturday. The networks of Verizon Communications, AT&T and Lumen Technologies, along with other telecoms, were breached by the recently discovered intrusion, the newspaper said, citing people familiar with the matter. The hackers might have held access for months to network infrastructure used by the companies to cooperate with court-authorized US requests for communications data, the report said. The hackers had also accessed other tranches of Internet traffic, it said. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs
EYEING THE US ELECTION: Analysts say that Pyongyang would likely leverage its enlarged nuclear arsenal for concessions after a new US administration is inaugurated North Korean leader Kim Jong-un warned again that he could use nuclear weapons in potential conflicts with South Korea and the US, as he accused them of provoking North Korea and raising animosities on the Korean Peninsula, state media reported yesterday. Kim has issued threats to use nuclear weapons pre-emptively numerous times, but his latest warning came as experts said that North Korea could ramp up hostilities ahead of next month’s US presidential election. In a Monday speech at a university named after him, the Kim Jong-un National Defense University, he said that North Korea “will without hesitation use all its attack
RSS