General Wesley Clark delivered a searing indictment of the Bush administration on Friday, asserting that its "headlong rush to war" was based on twisted facts and had violated the nation's democratic principles "with dire consequences for our security."
He said that the administration was governing "against the will of the majority" by being secretive, demonizing critics and retaliating harshly "against anyone who expresses dissent, questions their facts or challenges their logic."
Clark, 58, a former supreme Allied commander in Europe for NATO and the most recent entrant into the Democratic presidential race, called for an investigation of the intelligence information that led the country into the Iraq war.
"We need an independent, comprehensive investigation into the administration's handling of the intelligence leading to war in Iraq," he said. "Nothing could be a more serious violation of public trust than to consciously make a case for war based on false claims," he said, adding, "We need to know if we were intentionally deceived."
And as other Democratic presidential candidates have done, he called for an independent commission to investigate accusations that the White House released the name of a covert operative whose husband had challenged Bush's assertions that Iraq posed a threat. The Justice Department is investigating the assertions.
"Why," Clark asked, "would White House officials have had that name?"
His speech, delivered here to a group of military reporters, was his clearest enunciation of his rationale for running -- that as the commander of NATO forces who pulled together the 19-member alliance to win its first and only war, in Kosovo in 1999, he was a sophisticated and experienced player on the international stage.
It also underscored his other rationale -- that as a four-star general, he had the credentials and credibility to challenge Bush not only on the war in Iraq but also on America's role in the world at a time when national security is a heightened priority.
His campaign aides suggest that Clark is running for president because he is "the right man at the right time." He said as much in his speech on Friday as he described the confluence of a disturbing series of events, including the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, reports that CIA analysts felt pressured to make their intelligence assessments of Iraq conform with the administration's policy objectives and a report by the House intelligence committee that there was insufficient evidence to go to war.
Moreover, he said, the administration had fractured its relationship with its allies. He said this was not an accident, but "a direct consequence of the willful decisions of the administration to turn its back on 60 years of national security success that came directly from strong alliances."
Clark, who retired from the Army three years ago, said that since leaving the service he had been briefed by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and seen some of the intelligence that led the administration to declare war in Iraq.
In neither case, he said, had he heard or seen anything that should have compelled the nation to war. He said he had heard "behind the scenes" justifications for the war, such as that it would be a good way to reshape the Middle East.
"I'm retired," Clark said. "I'm not in that chain of command. That's why I'm speaking out. That's why I'm answering the call."
POLITICAL PRISONERS VS DEPORTEES: Venezuela’s prosecutor’s office slammed the call by El Salvador’s leader, accusing him of crimes against humanity Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele on Sunday proposed carrying out a prisoner swap with Venezuela, suggesting he would exchange Venezuelan deportees from the US his government has kept imprisoned for what he called “political prisoners” in Venezuela. In a post on X, directed at Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, Bukele listed off a number of family members of high-level opposition figures in Venezuela, journalists and activists detained during the South American government’s electoral crackdown last year. “The only reason they are imprisoned is for having opposed you and your electoral fraud,” he wrote to Maduro. “However, I want to propose a humanitarian agreement that
ECONOMIC WORRIES: The ruling PAP faces voters amid concerns that the city-state faces the possibility of a recession and job losses amid Washington’s tariffs Singapore yesterday finalized contestants for its general election on Saturday next week, with the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) fielding 32 new candidates in the biggest refresh of the party that has ruled the city-state since independence in 1965. The move follows a pledge by Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財), who took office last year and assumed the PAP leadership, to “bring in new blood, new ideas and new energy” to steer the country of 6 million people. His latest shake-up beats that of predecessors Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) and Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟), who replaced 24 and 11 politicians respectively
Young women standing idly around a park in Tokyo’s west suggest that a giant statue of Godzilla is not the only attraction for a record number of foreign tourists. Their faces lit by the cold glow of their phones, the women lining Okubo Park are evidence that sex tourism has developed as a dark flipside to the bustling Kabukicho nightlife district. Increasing numbers of foreign men are flocking to the area after seeing videos on social media. One of the women said that the area near Kabukicho, where Godzilla rumbles and belches smoke atop a cinema, has become a “real
‘WATER WARFARE’: A Pakistani official called India’s suspension of a 65-year-old treaty on the sharing of waters from the Indus River ‘a cowardly, illegal move’ Pakistan yesterday canceled visas for Indian nationals, closed its airspace for all Indian-owned or operated airlines, and suspended all trade with India, including to and from any third country. The retaliatory measures follow India’s decision to suspend visas for Pakistani nationals in the aftermath of a deadly attack by shooters in Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The rare attack on civilians shocked and outraged India and prompted calls for action against their country’s archenemy, Pakistan. New Delhi did not publicly produce evidence connecting the attack to its neighbor, but said it had “cross-border” links to Pakistan. Pakistan denied any connection to
RSS