British Prime Minister Tony Blair's Iraq crisis deepened on Thursday as ministers were accused of distorting the findings of the chief UN weapons inspector to support Britain's claims about former president Saddam Hussein's weapons program.
Amid growing anger among senior intelligence officials about Blair's use of their work for political ends, Hans Blix's office rejected claims by British ministers that he had provided unequivocal evidence of Iraq's chemical and biological weapons program.
As the UK prime minister became the first western leader to visit Iraq since the end of the war, Blix's spokesman said the chief weapons inspector had "never asserted" that Iraq definitely had weapons of mass destruction in the run-up to the conflict.
Ewen Buchanan, who said Blix had merely said there was a "strong presumption" that banned items such as anthrax still existed, was speaking after the UK armed forces minister, Adam Ingram, declared that the UN had provided "damning" evidence of illegal Iraqi weapons.
Buchanan's remarks will undermine the credibility of Blair's Downing Street office, which faced severe pressure over claims that it had doctored a dossier on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to strengthen the case for a war on Iraq.
An unnamed intelligence official told the BBC that the key claim in last September's dossier -- that Iraq could launch a chemical or biological attack within 45 minutes of an order -- had been inserted on the instructions of officials in Downing Street.
Alastair Campbell, the prime minister's director of communications, who played a key role in drawing up the dossier, said on Thursday in Basra that the BBC was "saying we forced the intelligence agencies to put things in the dossier that were untrue.
"That is wholly untrue; there is nothing in there that was not the work of the intelligence agencies."
As the prime minister insisted once again that banned weapons would be found, Downing Street faced renewed pressure when the hawkish deputy US defense secretary appeared to belittle the importance of such weapons.
Paul Wolfowitz told Vanity Fair magazine that the decision to highlight weapons of mass destruction as the main reason for invading Iraq was taken for "bureaucratic" reasons, indicating that Washington did not take the threat seriously.
Amid the furore, British intelligence sources expressed fury at Downing Street's behavior.
They were deeply reluctant to allow Downing Street to use their intelligence assessments because they feared it would be manipulated for political ends.
Widespread unease in the British intelligence community about Downing Street's use of their information in the September dossier was compounded by a second report in February containing sections that were plagiarized by Campbell's staff.
John Scarlett, chairman of Britain's joint intelligence committee, was reported to be furious at what a senior British official described as a "serious error."
Caveats about intelligence supplied by British intelligence and the British government's eavesdropping center at Cheltenham, were swept aside by Blair, egged on by Campbell, well-placed sources said.
A London source said on Thursday that, "It may take several months to decide what the Iraqis were doing."
He added that something had to be found, if only for political reasons, to support Blair.
Downing Street will also struggle to shrug off the remarks by Blix's office.
Showcasing phallus-shaped portable shrines and pink penis candies, Japan’s annual fertility festival yesterday teemed with tourists, couples and families elated by its open display of sex. The spring Kanamara Matsuri near Tokyo features colorfully dressed worshipers carrying a trio of giant phallic-shaped objects as they parade through the street with glee. The festival, as legend has it, honors a local blacksmith in the Edo Period (1603-1868) who forged an iron dildo to break the teeth of a sharp-toothed demon inhabiting a woman’s vagina that had been castrating young men on their wedding nights. A 1m black steel phallus sits in the courtyard of
JAN. 1 CLAUSE: As military service is voluntary, applications for permission to stay abroad for over three months for men up to age 45 must, in principle, be granted A little-noticed clause in sweeping changes to Germany’s military service policy has triggered an uproar after it emerged that the law requires men aged up to 45 to get permission from the armed forces before any significant stay abroad, even in peacetime. The legislation, which went into effect on Jan. 1 aims to bolster the military and demands all 18-year-old men fill out a questionnaire to gauge their suitability to serve in the armed forces, but stops short of conscription. If the “modernized” model fails to pull in enough recruits, parliament will be compelled to discuss the reintroduction of compulsory service, German
Filipino farmers like Romeo Wagayan have been left with little choice but to let their vegetables rot in the field rather than sell them at a loss, as rising oil prices linked to the Iran war drive up the cost of harvesting, labor and transport. “There’s nothing we can do,” said Wagayan, a 57-year old vegetable farmer in the northern Philippine province of Benguet. “If we harvest it, our losses only increase because of labor, transportation and packing costs. We don’t earn anything from it. That’s why we decided not to harvest at all,” he said. Soaring costs caused by the Middle East
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s officially declared wealth is fairly modest: some savings and a jointly owned villa in Budapest. However, voters in what Transparency International deems the EU’s most corrupt country believe otherwise — and they might make Orban pay in a general election this Sunday that could spell an end to his 16-year rule. The wealth amassed by Orban’s inner circle is fueling the increasingly palpable frustration of a population grappling with sluggish growth, high inflation and worsening public services. “The government’s communication machine worked well as long as our economic situation remained relatively good,” said Zoltan Ranschburg, a political analyst