It sounded so specific a few weeks ago: The US, with great fanfare, convened a conference of Iraqi political figures and emerged hours later with a timetable -- some form of interim government in early June.
Now the deadline has been pushed back until mid-July, at the earliest.
Six weeks after the US military took Baghdad and former president Saddam Hussein's regime collapsed, Iraq remains without a formal government. Ministries are operating under American auspices, staffed by Iraqis who know their employment may be limited.
The US has held two large conferences, hosting scores of Iraqi political figures for discussions on what form the interim government should take. But exactly how and when that will be done has never been stated specifically.
Making those plans more urgent is unwillingness among Iraqis to tolerate a long-term US military occupation.
Yesterday, Iraq's US civilian administrator, L. Paul Bremer, said that a national conference that will pick Iraq's new interim government probably won't be held until mid-July.
"I don't think it will be in June," Bremer told reporters during a tour of the newly reopened al-Karkh jail on the outskirts of Baghdad. "We're talking now like sometime in July to get a national conference put together."
When pressed further, Bremer replied: "Mid-July."
The delay marks a substantial change from the timetable outlined after an April 28 conference with Iraqi political leaders by US President George W. Bush's envoy, Zalmay Khalilzad.
Three weeks ago, US officials had suggested they were trying to come up with the best government they could cobble together quickly, then perfect it on the fly. Now, Bremer speaks of building a "representative government," a towering undertaking in a society riven by ethnic and political rifts -- and one that will take time.
"This is going to be a difficult job, as indeed the Iraqi leaders -- every one of them -- recognized," he said Sunday. "We have to deal first with ... law and order, basic services, getting people paid."
One official at the US Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance acknowledged that the process of setting up an interim authority had been slowed by the need to represent all segments of society.
He said the plan was to assemble about 300 representatives -- the same number as attended the April meeting -- "and that out of that meeting will emerge ... the interim authority."
The Iraqi politicians involved, presumably unwilling to criticize US officials, have said little about the delay.
The Iraqi National Congress, an exile group, and six other organizations have been meeting with the US and are expected to form part of the nucleus of a new Iraqi government. Others include the two major Kurdish groups from northern Iraq -- the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan and the Kurdistan Democratic Party -- and a Shiite Muslim group, the Supreme Council of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq.
Many Iraqis, especially former government workers, are impatient to get things going.
Other than a one-time US$20 emergency payment, most have not been paid since the war began March 20.
"The sooner the new government is formed, the better," said Raeeda Sadiq, a 35-year-old accountant at the Finance Ministry. "We do not know who to go to with our complaints as civil servants."
The top problem on most Iraqis' minds is safety. Though courts have slowly opened and some police have returned to their beats, banditry and carjackings remain common.
"We think the faster we go into an interim government, the faster we achieve security," said Adel Abdel-Mahdi, a spokesman for SCIRI, the Shiite Muslim political movement.
"The interim government is a central point that can resolve all the other issues," he said.
Many Iraqis also say their streets will remain unsafe until there is a government.
"Any delay in setting up a new government would certainly keep us up at night," said Hussein Abbas Jaber, a 50-year-old clerk at the Finance Ministry. "Anyone could come into your house and kill you."
On one thing everyone agrees: A full government will take time. Iraqis, who for decades have been forbidden to talk politics, now must help forge a new state.
Two medieval fortresses face each other across the Narva River separating Estonia from Russia on Europe’s eastern edge. Once a symbol of cooperation, the “Friendship Bridge” connecting the two snow-covered banks has been reinforced with rows of razor wire and “dragon’s teeth” anti-tank obstacles on the Estonian side. “The name is kind of ironic,” regional border chief Eerik Purgel said. Some fear the border town of more than 50,0000 people — a mixture of Estonians, Russians and people left stateless after the fall of the Soviet Union — could be Russian President Vladimir Putin’s next target. On the Estonian side of the bridge,
Jeremiah Kithinji had never touched a computer before he finished high school. A decade later, he is teaching robotics, and even took a team of rural Kenyans to the World Robotics Olympiad in Singapore. In a classroom in Laikipia County — a sparsely populated grasslands region of northern Kenya known for its rhinos and cheetahs — pupils are busy snapping together wheels, motors and sensors to assemble a robot. Guiding them is Kithinji, 27, who runs a string of robotics clubs in the area that have taken some of his pupils far beyond the rural landscapes outside. In November, he took a team
SHOW OF SUPPORT: The move showed that aggression toward Greenland is a question for Europe and Canada, and the consequences are global, not just Danish, experts said Canada and France, which adamantly oppose US President Donald Trump’s wish to control Greenland, were to open consulates in the Danish autonomous territory’s capital yesterday, in a strong show of support for the local government. Since returning to the White House last year, Trump has repeatedly insisted that Washington needs to control the strategic, mineral-rich Arctic island for security reasons. Trump last month backed off his threats to seize Greenland after saying he had struck a “framework” deal with NATO chief Mark Rutte to ensure greater US influence. A US-Denmark-Greenland working group has been established to discuss ways to meet Washington’s security concerns
Civil society leaders and members of a left-wing coalition yesterday filed impeachment complaints against Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte, restarting a process sidelined by the Supreme Court last year. Both cases accuse Duterte of misusing public funds during her term as education secretary, while one revives allegations that she threatened to assassinate former ally Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The filings come on the same day that a committee in the House of Representatives was to begin hearings into impeachment complaints against Marcos, accused of corruption tied to a spiraling scandal over bogus flood control projects. Under the constitution, an impeachment by the
RSS