American allies on Friday applauded US President George W. Bush's challenge to the world to reject terrorism or else, saying the president found the perfect tone to attract broad international support.
But many warned that Bush must now follow up his well-chosen words to the US Congress with carefully considered actions.
PHOTO: APN
"Finland no more than the [European Union] will give the United States full authority in advance to act as it wishes," Finnish Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen said in Parliament before leaving for the EU summit. "The most important thing is to demonstrate prudence. The legitimacy of any actions is also important."
Danish Foreign Minister Mogens Lykketoft said the global coalition against terrorism will be so broad "that [the Americans] will listen to what worries the coalition will have to the means that will be used."
But British Prime Minister Tony Blair, leader of one of America's closest allies, expressed no reservations in declaring that his country stood ready to help the US against the perpetrators of last week's attack, believed to have killed more than 6,000 people.
"This is a struggle that concerns us all, the whole of the democratic and civilized and free world," said Blair, who watched the speech from the House gallery in a seat next to First Lady Laura Bush. "I give you, on behalf of our country, our solidarity, our sympathy and support."
Bush emphasized that last week's jetliner attacks in New York City and Washington were not just strikes against America, but against the global community.
"This is the world's fight," Bush said.
Czech President Vaclav Havel said he agreed entirely with Bush's call for every nation to join in a war against global terrorism.
This "is not a war against a state, a nation, or a religion," Havel said after meeting Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic. "It is a war against terrorists."
But Bush's forceful demands, particularly to Afghanistan's ruling Taliban to immediately surrender Osama bin Laden and his fighters "or they will share their fate," were met with derision and anger in some parts of the world.
In Pakistan, Bush was burned in effigy as thousands of hardline Muslims protested their country's decision to cooperate against neighboring Afghanistan.
In the Middle East, defiant voices were raised mainly in mosques as Islamic clerics called America's newly declared war an attack on Islam.
Cleric Bakir Abdul-Razak condemned "the new crusade" as "war with a new cover" in prayers carried on Iraqi state TV.
"By God's will, the Americans will not have an upper hand on us," the Iraqi cleric cried. "We call for jihad [holy war], and we defy you, the Americans."
In Amman, Jordan, cleric Mussa Abu-Sweilem roared that "the Muslim people are united, just like one body."
At a news conference in Pakistan, the Taliban ambassador said he was sorry that people had died in the suicide attacks, but appealed to the US not to endanger innocent people in a military retaliation.
"Our position on this is that if America has proof, we are ready for the trial of Osama bin Laden in light of the evidence."
Sergei Rogov, the head of the USA Canada Institute, a political think tank in Moscow, said Bush's speech was a "masterpiece of political rhetoric" but that he had failed to acknowledge America's own mistakes, particularly in its Middle East policy.
CROSS-STRAIT COLLABORATION: The new KMT chairwoman expressed interest in meeting the Chinese president from the start, but she’ll have to pay to get in Beijing allegedly agreed to let Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) around the Lunar New Year holiday next year on three conditions, including that the KMT block Taiwan’s arms purchases, a source said yesterday. Cheng has expressed interest in meeting Xi since she won the KMT’s chairmanship election in October. A source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said a consensus on a meeting was allegedly reached after two KMT vice chairmen visited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤) in China last month. Beijing allegedly gave the KMT three conditions it had to
‘BALANCE OF POWER’: Hegseth said that the US did not want to ‘strangle’ China, but to ensure that none of Washington’s allies would be vulnerable to military aggression Washington has no intention of changing the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said on Saturday, adding that one of the US military’s main priorities is to deter China “through strength, not through confrontation.” Speaking at the annual Reagan National Defense Forum in Simi Valley, California, Hegseth outlined the US Department of Defense’s priorities under US President Donald Trump. “First, defending the US homeland and our hemisphere. Second, deterring China through strength, not confrontation. Third, increased burden sharing for us, allies and partners. And fourth, supercharging the US defense industrial base,” he said. US-China relations under
The Chien Feng IV (勁蜂, Mighty Hornet) loitering munition is on track to enter flight tests next month in connection with potential adoption by Taiwanese and US armed forces, a government source said yesterday. The kamikaze drone, which boasts a range of 1,000km, debuted at the Taipei Aerospace and Defense Technology Exhibition in September, the official said on condition of anonymity. The Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology and US-based Kratos Defense jointly developed the platform by leveraging the engine and airframe of the latter’s MQM-178 Firejet target drone, they said. The uncrewed aerial vehicle is designed to utilize an artificial intelligence computer
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus yesterday decided to shelve proposed legislation that would give elected officials full control over their stipends, saying it would wait for a consensus to be reached before acting. KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) last week proposed amendments to the Organic Act of the Legislative Yuan (立法院組織法) and the Regulations on Allowances for Elected Representatives and Subsidies for Village Chiefs (地方民意代表費用支給及村里長事務補助費補助條例), which would give legislators and councilors the freedom to use their allowances without providing invoices for reimbursement. The proposal immediately drew criticism, amid reports that several legislators face possible charges of embezzling fees intended to pay