BLOOMBERG, New York
I was in a taxi, heading down Manhattan's West Side Highway for a conference at the World Trade Center when the first airliner flew over us and crashed into the North Tower. It was 8:50am.
PHOTO: AFP
Traffic came to an immediate halt. I jumped from the cab, climbed the fence and ran three blocks to the trade center as it began falling apart. I interviewed witnesses, including two financial industry workers riding their bikes to work.
"It was like a mirage," said Mark Lewis, a systems analyst at Citigroup Inc's Salomon Smith Barney unit. "I looked up and saw [the plane] melting into the building."
Just then we heard a tremendous noise, looked up and saw another large passenger plane slam into the South Tower, 50 or 60 stories up. Glass and debris rained down as we ran into a nearby building.
Police and emergency workers were everywhere. Workers streamed from nearby buildings and were directed away from the area. Many stopped to stare at the huge towers, the upper floors engulfed in flames, while other people were trying to get away. Twisted pieces of metal and broken glass were everywhere.
Shoes and clothing, perhaps from the airplane luggage, lay scattered in the streets.
And then the screams started. People trapped on the upper floors of the trade center began jumping or falling -- 80, 90, 100 stories to certain death. "Oh my God," a policeman standing next to me shouted. He grabbed my arm. "Don't look. Don't look," he said.
We were close enough to hear the sickening thud as the bodies hit the ground.
A tall, thin Hispanic man grabbed me. He was shaking in shock and terror. An unemployed laborer, he was in the plaza between the two towers when the first plane hit, he said, and was scared and ran out. Then he started to cry.
Cellular phones weren't working because all circuits were busy. I found a pay phone and called the newsroom. I was on hold to go on television when I heard a third, huge explosion.
Debris and smoke headed straight for me and I joined police and emergency workers who had been standing around and began racing for safety. The concussion from the explosion knocked me to the ground.
I jumped up and began running again, trying desperately to stay ahead of the huge cloud of debris and smoke, but the Hudson River blocked our escape. I dove behind a police van as glass and shards of metal fell.
And then came the clouds of thick black smoke mixed with minuscule pieces of ash -- similar to volcanic ash -- filled the air. We couldn't breathe, we couldn't see. I put my coat over my face, gasping for breath. Out of the gloom I heard someone yell "head south." Grasping the riverside railing, dozens of people staggered, crawled, and walked through the smoke, with no idea where they were or where they were going, other than away. When the smoke began to lift, I found I was in Battery Park and ran into a group of economists, all from outside New York City, from the conference we were supposed to attend at the World Trade Center.
I led them up the East Side highway, where thousands like us were fleeing what we could no longer see. Except for the sounds of sirens, it was completely silent.
You couldn't see anything, looking down the narrow streets of the Wall Street area. The smoke and ash were so thick the buildings disappeared into a haze.
The highway looked like a refugee evacuation. Silent, in shock, people trudged north, enveloped in clouds of smoke. Someone shouted that the World Trade Center collapsed. A woman standing on the highway handed me a dust mask. Another stopped me and said, "you're bleeding." I hadn't noticed gashes on my hand and arm.
She poured water on the wounds and dried them.
A policeman urged people to keep walking. The Brooklyn Bridge was open for pedestrians, he said, suggesting the stream of tourists and financial district workers get out of Manhattan.
A news van drove slowly by with a cameraman I knew. He picked me up and drove north, past the stunned and silent people, back to our newsroom in midtown Manhattan.
I thought of the policeman who had warned me to leave the area shortly before the third explosion when the World Trade Center collapsed. He insisted I go. I told him I was a reporter.
Give me a break, I pleaded.
"There are no breaks for anyone today," he said.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive