Pundits say that, while asset-backed securities will bring a number of benefits to Taiwan's economy, there are shortcomings in the legal framework of the current draft on securitization which could bring more problems ahead.
"Judging by the US experience, securitization should greatly benefit Taiwan's capital market and economy," said Joseph Hu (扈企平), the managing director of structured finance ratings at Standard & Poor's.
Hu made the comment yesterday in a seminar about asset securitization that was held by Taiwan Ratings Corp (
The US, which began securitizing assets in 1970, currently has a total outstanding balance of asset-backed securities amounting to an estimated US$4.7 trillion. That figure greatly surpasses US treasuries, corporate bonds, and state and local government debts combined, according to Hu.
Taiwan's government is at this moment in the process of proposing draft legislation that will legalize asset-backed securities, and is expected to submit the draft to the Legislative Yuan in the first half of the year, said Council of Economic Planning and Development advisor Lee Kao-chao (
Hu pointed out that a number of positive effects could be brought about by the new market.
"Taiwan's capital markets have always been far stronger in the equities sector when compared to the fixed-income sector," said Hu. To implement securitization at this juncture would be a great opportunity. A well-developed fixed-income market provides Taiwan's economy a critically needed "alternative means to raise funds other than stock issuance," according to Hu.
The new market may be able to reduce the huge non-performing loan (NPL) held by Taiwan's banking industry, which totalled NT$1.64 trillion at the end of 2001.
"Implementing securitization by packaging and selling NPLs through an asset-backed securities mechanism is an excellent way of killing two birds with one stone," said Hu.
"Taiwan can learn about asset securitization by doing it, and in the mean time address one of [the sector's] most urgent problems: marketing loans held by commercial banks." In addition, securitization can enhance efficient use of capital and raise living standards, according to Hu.
"One of the results of the liquidation of NPLs through securitization is that commercial banks will now be able to focus on making efficient use of their capital in new loan-origination and new investments," said Hu.
"Finance creates value."
One reason why Taiwan was able to grow rapidly during most of the 1980s and 1990s was that commercial banks made financing available to entrepreneurs for building factories, expanding production, financing inventories, and facilitating exports. Taiwan needs to resort to new financing techniques and regain its old efficiency in financing economic activities. By constantly creating value, the economy can continue to grow and raise the standard of living for its people, according to Hu.
However, legalizing the market might pose other problems.
"The current draft of securitization is not sophisticated enough to cope with the new market. If we do not make comprehensive laws regarding this market, we might be creating more problems than we solve," said Norman Yin (殷乃平), a PFP legislator and banking professor at National Chengchi University.
"Before we enact the securitization law, more consideration is needed on how to eliminate the loopholes in the current draft," said Yin.
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
EMBRACING TAIWAN: US lawmakers have introduced an act aiming to replace the use of ‘Chinese Taipei’ with ‘Taiwan’ across all Washington’s federal agencies A group of US House of Representatives lawmakers has introduced legislation to replace the term “Chinese Taipei” with “Taiwan” across all federal agencies. US Representative Byron Donalds announced the introduction of the “America supports Taiwan act,” which would mandate federal agencies adopt “Taiwan” in place of “Chinese Taipei,” a news release on his page on the US House of Representatives’ Web site said. US representatives Mike Collins, Barry Moore and Tom Tiffany are cosponsors of the legislation, US political newspaper The Hill reported yesterday. “The legislation is a push to normalize the position of Taiwan as an autonomous country, although the official US
CHANGE OF TONE: G7 foreign ministers dropped past reassurances that there is no change in the position of the G7 members on Taiwan, including ‘one China’ policies G7 foreign ministers on Friday took a tough stance on China, stepping up their language on Taiwan and omitting some conciliatory references from past statements, including to “one China” policies. A statement by ministers meeting in Canada mirrored last month’s Japan-US statement in condemning “coercion” toward Taiwan. Compared with a G7 foreign ministers’ statement in November last year, the statement added members’ concerns over China’s nuclear buildup, although it omitted references to their concerns about Beijing’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. Also missing were references stressing the desire for “constructive and stable relations with China” and