Following China Development Industrial Bank's (
"All the directors of Grand Cathay have reached a consensus, and even promised, that they are not going to sell their shares to any outsiders in the near term," said Wang Sheng (
"I believe all [our] directors will honor their promise. We are going to disclose formally our stand [on the China Development bid] in the near term."
As to the tender offer made by China Development, originally proposed on March 22 and expected to be launched early next week, "before the last minute [of the tender offer] came, no one could ascertain its final result," Wang added.
Grand Cathay made the comments as part of a company statement posted on the TAISDAQ's Web site yesterday, stating that "the company suggests that all shareholders should take the same stand as the current directors of the board, which is to continue supporting the management of current directors."
The Grand Cathay board also announced on the Web site that "the board does not welcome China Development's tender offer on Grand Cathay's shares."
"The tender offer [by China Development] is not a simple case of manipulating share prices," said Grand Cathay president Wang. "But since the whole procedure in this case is very complicated, it's hard to describe in detail."
Wang made the comments while attending the signing of a strategic alliance between the International Bank of Taipei (台北國際商銀) and Grand Cathay.
"Regardless of the takeover bid, we will continue our cooperation with the International Bank of Taipei," said Wang.
The cooperation between Grand Cathay and the International Bank of Taipei also shows that Grand Cathay is not interested in merging with China Development. The International Bank of Taipei also controls certain portion of Grand Cathay' shares currently, but a bank executive said they are still far from merging with Grand Cathay, at least not for now.
"If the merger trend is a must in the future, we could not rule out the possibility of merging with Grand Cathay," said Yu Kuo-chih (
The Securities and Futures Commission (證期會) is going to make its ruling Monday on whether to approve China Development's tender offer.
If the commission gives its approval, China Development would launch its offer for 100 million shares of Grand Cathay at NT$20 a share in the open market immediately after the ruling.
Originally China Development offered to buy 200 million shares of Grand Cathay, but later lowered the bid to 100 million shares on Wednesday.
"The KMT obviously dislikes China Development's hostile takeover bid [on Grand Cathay], especially when China Development's executives are said to be supporters of the currently DPP administration," said Dicky Dai (戴震), a senior market commentator and former chairman of local securities and fund companies.
"The hostile takeover case has become a business confrontation between the two political parties. Since Grand Cathay has been the largest securities underwriter, there is significant business interest and political influence [in the public companies]. Whoever wins the battle, it's like winning a small scale election in the securities market," he said
Benny Hu (
Cathay closed on the TAISDAQ unchanged at NT$18.2 yesterday.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
RSS