President William Lai (賴清德) is charting a course toward strategic clarity, experts in Taipei said, adding that unifying Taiwanese society has become his presidency’s greatest challenge.
They made the comment at a conference on Friday about the polarizing impact of great powers competition on Asia’s geopolitics cohosted by the Taipei School of Economics and Political Science Foundation, National Tsing Hua University’s Taipei School of Economics and Political Science, and Harvard’s Rajawali Foundation Institute for Asia.
Taiwan had been committed to a policy of ambiguity during the presidency of Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), whose platform of putting economics before politics enjoyed overwhelming popularity, National Taiwan University political science professor Tung Han-pu (童涵浦) said.
Photo: An Rong Xu, Bloomberg
The Ma administration’s signature policy was the “three nos” that renounced discussion of unification with Beijing, pursuit of de jure Taiwan independence and use of military force to resolve the Taiwan issue, he said.
By recognizing the so-called “1992 consensus” and avoiding diplomatic clashes with Beijing, Ma was able promote ambiguity and unification, he said, adding that the policy had worked at the time, because the US and China were not competing in earnest.
The “1992 consensus” — a term that former MAC chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in 2006 admitted making up in 2000 — refers to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) enjoyed a similar level of popular support, but used her power to turn away from the “1992 consensus,” Tung said.
Tsai promoted the de facto autonomy of Taiwan, national security law amendments and developed military strength while avoiding overt displays in support of independence, he said.
The nation’s moderate pro-independence stance sharply contrasted with the increasingly strident regime of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) even as US-China relations grew cold, he said.
Opinions can now be formed about Lai’s vision for the nation five months after his election and in the wake of his Double Ten National Day address on Thursday, Tung said.
Lai has voiced a clear rejection of the “1992 consensus” and emphasized sovereignty in a marked shift from Tsai’s stance on the nation’s relationship with China and its place in the world, he said.
Lai’s speech showed no interest in defining the difference between the Republic of China and Taiwan, and instead focused on the nation as a separate political entity from the People’s Republic of China, Tung said.
The clear and consistent messaging about the nation’s de facto independence signaled a break from the strategic ambiguity of the past, he said.
Although Lai’s creation of the Whole-of-Society Defense Resilience Committee could be seen as an affirmation of continuity with the Tsai administration, it could also be seen as an extension of the shift to strategic clarity, Tung said.
The polarization in Taiwanese society would likely become the biggest challenge to Lai, as embittered voters increasingly expressed a desire to emigrate or unwillingness to fight for the nation, Tung said, citing recent polls.
The whole-of-society resilience the government is so intent on facilitating hinges on cooperation across social divides, he said.
Polarization is affecting Taiwan and the global community, as nations coalesce into opposing camps led by the US and China, Academia Sinica Institute of Political Science researcher Wu Yu-shan (吳玉山) said.
Concurrent drives to enhance internal solidarity and outward-facing strength are the classic signs of polarizing geopolitics, Wu said, adding that proxy conflicts in the peripheries of great powers are a real danger to the world.
The US-Japan joint statement released on Friday not mentioning the “one China” policy might be a sign that US President Donald Trump intends to decouple US-China relations from Taiwan, a Taiwanese academic said. Following Trump’s meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba on Friday, the US and Japan issued a joint statement where they reaffirmed the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and support for Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations. Trump has not personally brought up the “one China” policy in more than a year, National Taiwan University Department of Political Science Associate Professor Chen Shih-min (陳世民)
‘NEVER!’ Taiwan FactCheck Center said it had only received donations from the Open Society Foundations, which supports nonprofits that promote democratic values Taiwan FactCheck Center (TFC) has never received any donation from the US Agency for International Development (USAID), a cofounder of the organization wrote on his Facebook page on Sunday. The Taipei-based organization was established in 2018 by Taiwan Media Watch Foundation and the Association of Quality Journalism to monitor and verify news and information accuracy. It was officially registered as a foundation in 2021. National Chung Cheng University communications professor Lo Shih-hung (羅世宏), a cofounder and chairman of TFC, was responding to online rumors that the TFC receives funding from the US government’s humanitarian assistance agency via the Open Society Foundations (OSF),
ANNUAL LIGHT SHOW: The lanterns are exhibited near Taoyuan’s high-speed rail station and around the Taoyuan Sports Park Station of the airport MRT line More than 400 lanterns are to be on display at the annual Taiwan Lantern Festival, which officially starts in Taoyuan today. The city is hosting the festival for the second time — the first time was in 2016. The Tourism Administration held a rehearsal of the festival last night. Chunghwa Telecom donated the main lantern of the festival to the Taoyuan City Government. The lanterns are exhibited in two main areas: near the high-speed rail (HSR) station in Taoyuan, which is at the A18 station of the Taoyuan Airport MRT, and around the Taoyuan Sports Park Station of the MRT
An alleged US government plan to encourage Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) to form a joint venture with Intel to boost US chipmaking would place the Taiwanese foundry giant in a more disadvantageous position than proposed tariffs on imported chips, a semiconductor expert said yesterday. If TSMC forms a joint venture with its US rival, it faces the risk of technology outflow, said Liu Pei-chen (劉佩真), a researcher at the Taiwan Industry Economics Database of the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research. A report by international financial services firm Baird said that Asia semiconductor supply chain talks suggest that the US government would