Courts should force local governments to accept marriage registrations from same-sex couples, rather than wait for the Legislative Yuan to take action, same-sex marriage rights advocates said yesterday outside the Taipei High Administrative Court, protesting against potential “civil union” legislation.
The protest coincided with the reopening of several suits against local governments which refused to register same-sex unions in 2014, which had been put on hold in expectation of a Council of Grand Justices interpretation on the constitutionality of Civil Code provisions.
The grand justices in May ruled the Civil Code is unconstitutional in its failure to recognize same-sex couples’ unions, while also ruling that the Legislative Yuan should decide whether to amend the Civil Code, pass a “special law” or use other means to recognize marriage equality, leaving open the question of whether “civil unions” would be sufficient.
Photo: CNA
The Legislative Yuan has two years to pass related legislation, with same-sex couples granted the right to directly register marriages if no legislation is passed before the deadline.
“We hope the courts will also force a review of the original administrative decisions denying same-sex registration rights, because they have already been determined to be illegal,” said Awakening Foundation member Chuang Chiao-ju (莊喬汝), who is also an attorney for of one of the couples involved in the legal dispute.
“The council’s ruling very clearly states that not permitting same-sex couples to marry is unconstitutional, and that applies immediately, not in two years,” lawyer Pan Tien-ching (潘天慶) said.
Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights chief executive officer Victoria Hsu (許秀雯) said a number of couples attempted to register immediately following the grand justices’ decision, only to be told that are still no “legal grounds” for accepting their registration.
Most local governments now accept registrations which “annotate” the household registrations of same-sex couples, but such registrations do not offer the same legal rights as a marriage, Hsu said.
“If the court finds the original decision unconstitutional while still allowing the executive branch to do anything it pleases, then they are just stalling,” she said, adding that courts have the authority to deal with individual cases.
“The decision said same-sex couples could directly register their union if the law is not changed in two years, but the legal foundation for allowing such registration is not from nowhere, it exists now,” she said. “While there might be complications if the Legislative Yuan passes something different, that should not be a reason to refuse the rights couples who wish to register now.”
At yesterday’s hearing, the judge said case rests on two main points: First, if the decision by registration offices was legal, and second, if the High Administrative Court has the authority to review the decision.
On the first issue, the grand justices made the ruling, which would render decisions by registration offices in violation of the law, the judge said.
People opposed to marriage equality also protested at the court shouting: “The justice system is not for playing games; the constitutional interpretation has no credibility” and “TAPCPR [Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights], do not try to fool the people, the constitutional interpretation was a bungled decision. It has no binding power.”
Additional reporting by Jason Pan
Twenty-four Republican members of the US House of Representatives yesterday introduced a concurrent resolution calling on the US government to abolish the “one China” policy and restore formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan. Led by US representatives Tom Tiffany and Scott Perry, the resolution calls for not only re-establishing formal relations, but also urges the US Trade Representative to negotiate a free-trade agreement (FTA) with Taiwan and for US officials to advocate for Taiwan’s full membership in the UN and other international organizations. In a news release announcing the resolution, Tiffany, who represents a Wisconsin district, called the “one China” policy “outdated, counterproductive
ON PAROLE: The 73-year-old suspect has a criminal record of rape committed when he was serving in the military, as well as robbery and theft, police said The Kaohsiung District Court yesterday approved the detention of a 73-year-old man for allegedly murdering three women. The suspect, surnamed Chang (張), was arrested on Wednesday evening in connection with the death of a 71-year-old woman surnamed Chao (趙). The Kaohsiung City Police Department yesterday also unveiled the identities of two other possible victims in the serial killing case, a 75-year-old woman surnamed Huang (黃), the suspect’s sister-in-law, and a 75-year-old woman surnamed Chang (張), who is not related to the suspect. The case came to light when Chao disappeared after taking the suspect back to his residence on Sunday. Police, upon reviewing CCTV
Johanne Liou (劉喬安), a Taiwanese woman who shot to unwanted fame during the Sunflower movement protests in 2014, was arrested in Boston last month amid US President Donald Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigrants, the Criminal Investigation Bureau (CIB) said yesterday. The arrest of Liou was first made public on the official Web site of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Tuesday. ICE said Liou was apprehended for overstaying her visa. The Boston Field Office’s Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) had arrested Liou, a “fugitive, criminal alien wanted for embezzlement, fraud and drug crimes in Taiwan,” ICE said. Liou was taken into custody
TRUMP ERA: The change has sparked speculation on whether it was related to the new US president’s plan to dismiss more than 1,000 Joe Biden-era appointees The US government has declined to comment on a post that indicated the departure of Laura Rosenberger as chair of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT). Neither the US Department of State nor the AIT has responded to the Central News Agency’s questions on the matter, after Rosenberger was listed as a former chair on the AIT’s official Web site, with her tenure marked as 2023 to this year. US officials have said previously that they usually do not comment on personnel changes within the government. Rosenberger was appointed head of the AIT in 2023, during the administration of former US president Joe