The Homemakers United Foundation yesterday accused the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of trying to mislead the public by running an advertisement that says there is insufficient scientific evidence that genetically modified (GM) food causes cancer.
The agency placed a half-page advertisement in the Chinese-language United Daily News on Wednesday last week entitled “Is genetically modified food carcinogenic? There is not enough scientific evidence!” It cited statements from a biotechnology professor in Taiwan, the vice president of a food company in South Korea and FDA Director Yeh Ming-kung (葉明功).
The advertisement claimed that a renowned experiment by French scientist Gilles-Eric Seralini — which showed that laboratory rats had higher cancer rates when fed with genetically modified corn — was removed by its publisher because of the small sample size and the breed of rats used for the experiment.
Photo courtesy of the Homemakers UNITED FOUNDATION
It quoted a Taiwanese professor and a South Korean food company official as saying that there is no clear scientific evidence that eating genetically modified food is harmful to human health.
It also quoted Yeh as saying that with so many genetically modified foods in the market, it would be meaningless and costly to specify every product, so the FDA will only mark food products that do not have genetically modified ingredients.
The foundation accused the FDA of quoting the specialists out of context to suit its own purpose and of wasting taxpayers’ money to convey so-called “scientific facts.”
It said that officers from Monsanto Co, the world’s largest producer of genetically modified seed, had visited Taiwan in April, and questioned whether the agency had placed the advertisement to pave the way for genetically modified food products.
The laboratory rats used in Monsanto’s experiments were the same, but it refused to publicize its experiment data and results, the foundation said.
“If genetically modified foods are so safe, why does the company refuse to publicize it?” the foundation asked.
It added that the negative effects of eating genetically modified food may become more evident after a longer period of time, and substances that do not seem to have an immediate harmful effect on the body do not mean that they are safe.
Proposed amendments to the Act Governing Food Safety and Sanitation (食品安全衛生管理法) requiring food companies to label genetically modified foods on product packages have just been drafted this month, but Yeh’s remark is a staggering blow to efforts to protect people’s right to know, it said.
The foundation urged the government to prioritize food safety and protecting the public, instead of ignoring risks such as environmental pollution and the harmful effect of growing or eating genetically modified foods.
The Council of Agriculture yesterday signed a Taiwan-Australia Agricultural Cooperation Implementation clause to open a new export market for the nation’s pineapple crop. The clause is an addition to existing cooperation measures, it said. China on Friday last week abruptly announced that it would suspend pineapple imports from Taiwan starting on Monday, on grounds that it had on multiple occasions discovered “harmful organisms” in shipments of the fruit. The public and private sectors have since joined hands to purchase the local fruit to help the nation’s pineapple farmers. Canberra has requested that all pineapples for export to Australia have their crown buds removed,
A Tainan taxi driver is the Taiwanese with the longest name, after he last month changed it so that it now contains 25 characters, the Anping District Household Registration Office said. The 47-year-old man, formerly known as Huang Hsin-hsiang (黃鑫翔), applied for the name change on Feb. 26, in the hope that it would bring him good luck. His new name starts with Huang Da-lan (黃大嵐) and adds another 22 characters, meaning “Huang Da-lan is the blessed darling and sweetheart of the god of joy, god of wealth, god of misfortune, god of Earth and all the gods,” it said. With
Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Group might have lost its right to distribute the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for COVID-19 and the ability to fulfill a contract in Taiwan, civic groups Taiwan Citizen Front and the Economic Democracy Union said yesterday. In a radio interview on Feb. 17, Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), head of the Central Epidemic Command Center, said that last year, Taiwan was close to signing a contract to buy doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, but that the deal was halted at the last moment, with some speculating that Chinese interference was to blame. On Monday last week, the center
POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS: As China attempted to promote its national image through humanitarian aid, its targets include New Southbound Policy countries, an expert said China’s “vaccine diplomacy,” which has become central to its foreign policy this year, might hamper Taiwan’s efforts to build relations with developing countries, an expert said. “China, as one of the few countries other than the United Kingdom and the United States to have produced a COVID-19 vaccine, will certainly use that as a diplomatic tool,” said Kung Shan-son (龔祥生), an assistant research fellow at the government-funded Institute for National Defense and Security Research. Beijing’s major goals in its “vaccine diplomacy” are to promote its national image through humanitarian aid and to solidify its relations with countries that are included in its