Born in 1989, Steve Wang sometimes wonders what happened in his hometown of Beijing that year, but his curiosity about pro-democracy protests and the crackdown on them passes quickly.
“I was not part of it,” he said. “I know it could be important, but I cannot feel it.”
A quarter of a century after the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) attack on demonstrations centered on Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989, it is little more than a distant tale to most young Chinese. The CCP prohibits public discussion, and 1989 is banned from textbooks and Chinese Web sites.
Many have managed to learn something about the crackdown, through people they know, by navigating around China’s tight Internet controls or by traveling abroad.
Some are aware of the iconic image of resistance — the lone Chinese man standing in front of a line of tanks moving down the Avenue of Eternal Peace.
Yet often, they seem not to care. They grew up in an atmosphere of nationalism and pride amid two decades of strong economic growth. The turmoil caused by a student movement 25 years ago seems irrelevant to a generation more worried about finding jobs and buying apartments.
“They basically don’t bother to try to find out further,” said Fu King-wa (傅景華), a journalism professor at Hong Kong University. “Even if they learn about it, they believe the government’s version.”
Rowena He (何曉清), author of the book Tiananmen Exiles about the lives of the student protesters after the crackdown, said many Chinese students abroad claim they know a lot about it, but in fact know little.
“Some would say: ‘We know what happened, so what?’ That’s typical,” said He, who teaches at Harvard University.
Young Chinese tend to find it hard to empathize with students of the late 1980s, she said.
“The younger generation is more influenced by cynicism and materialism,” He said. “A Chinese student once said to me: ‘I really do not believe they took to the street for ideals.’”
Born in July, 1989, in a Beijing hospital not far from the site of the bloody crackdown, Wang grew up without hearing a word about the student movement from his parents or teachers. He first heard about it from friends in college in China.
“I was quite curious and wanted to know about it, but I could not find anything,” Wang said.
In 2010, Wang went to school in England where he met a Hong Kong student who showed him a video of the crackdown.
“All I could remember was a young man trying to stop a tank from rolling forward,” Wang said.
The Hong Kong student “asked me why it has to be like this. I was stupefied.”
Back in Beijing, Wang does not think the student movement would come up in any discussion.
“Who would bring it up? There’s been no reason to talk about it,” Wang said. “Much time has passed since then and China will not report it anymore. Now the foreign media want to make a fuss out of it. They are talking up the negative things about China.”
At Peking University, once a center of the student protests, Tiananmen seems to have little relevance to today’s students.
“It is not something that concerns us anymore,” said Zhang Yu, a graduate student in sociology.
Although some bold Peking University professors have shared their knowledge with their students, most keep the topic out of the classroom.
Chen Haoyun, a freshman majoring in aeronautics, said he first heard about it when a teaching assistant mentioned it in a history class.
“I do not know much about it. All I know is that it cannot be talked about,” Chen said. “I am interested, but the school does not talk about it.”
Peking University party secretary Zhu Shanlu (朱善璐) said that teachers must be careful when speaking to students about Tiananmen.
“You must take responsibility for the students and their values. It’s like buttoning up the first button — you cannot get the first button wrong,” Zhu told reporters when asked if the issue is off-limits on campus.
Even some young people with connections to the crackdown know little about it, including Wang Jiaying, a Beijing college student whose father participated in the student movement.
“He said he was not sensible at the time,” Wang said of her father. “I think it was a special event at a special time, which cannot be discussed now.”
Her roommate, Lu Qiuxuan, 21, learned it about from her mother, who was at a Beijing hospital caring for her grandmother at the time.
She told Lu about the constant flow of wounded students. Lu said she looked up information when she spent time overseas.
“I didn’t expect it was this huge, and there were so many people and so many injuries. I was shocked,” Lu said.
“I don’t know what should be the right conclusion, as long as the Chinese government does not say anything,” she said. “I regret that people of my generation cannot learn and understand it during our school years, and I think that has changed our outlook about our future.”
‘VIRUS DIPLOMACY’: The nation’s expertise in handling COVID-19 was among the reasons that it should not be excluded from the WHO, the European Parliament said The European Parliament this week passed resolutions that support Taiwan’s bid to participate in the WHO and its intention to negotiate a trade pact with Taiwan. During its plenary session from Monday to Thursday, the parliament approved resolutions on the foreign policy consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak and the EU’s trade policy, parts of which were viewed as friendly toward Taiwan by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In a statement yesterday, the ministry welcomed the passage of the resolutions and thanked the parliament for its support for Taiwan. In the first resolution, the parliament cited Beijing’s increasing threats to Taiwan, the crackdown on
The gig began with a nun chanting on stage, but suddenly erupted into a wall of noise unleashed by distorted guitars and screamed sutras — the unique sound of Taiwan’s first Buddhist death metal band. The nation has a vibrant metal scene, but few outfits are quite as eye-catching as Dharma (達摩樂隊), a band that aims to deliver enlightenment via the medium of throaty eight-string guitars and guttural roars. Dressed in robes — black, of course — they use traditional Sanskrit sutras as lyrics, but everything else screams death metal, from bloody face paint on stage to growled vocals, relentless riffs and
LOOPHOLES: The people behind biased media content produced by a Chinese network, likely without sending staff to Taiwan, remain anonymous, a source said Beijing’s latest attempt at psychological warfare through heavily biased online media is aimed at sowing discord and polarizing Taiwanese society, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said. The council’s comment came in response to Chinese network Southeast Television, which late last month began broadcasting an online program featuring commentary by Taiwanese unification supporters that authorities suspect was filmed illegally in Taiwan. To circumvent cross-strait regulations, the broadcaster collaborated with online service provider Baidu to air the series titles Diverse Voices From the Taiwan Strait (台海百家說). Only Taiwanese are shown on camera, without revealing the host, interviewer or production team. In one video, political commentator and
A petition has been launched calling for harsher drunk driving penalties in South Korea after a Taiwanese doctoral student was killed by an inebriated driver earlier this month in Seoul. On the evening of Nov. 6, 28-year-old theology student Tseng Yi-lin (曾以琳) was walking home from her professor’s house — crossing the road at a green pedestrian light — when she was hit by a drunk driver. South Korean authorities told Tseng’s parents that the driver would receive a lighter punishment “because the accident happened while the perpetrator was drunk,” the petition said. In response, friends of Tseng on Monday initiated a petition