The US has dismissed criticism that US President Barack Obama’s much-publicized pivot toward Asia is running out of steam.
“Beginning in 2009, the president made a strategic commitment to rebalance US foreign policy toward Asia,” the National Security Council’s East Asian Affairs senior director Evan Medeiros said.
Addressing a special briefing for foreign reporters, Medeiros said the president and his Cabinet had increased the amount of time, energy, resources and mindshare devoted to protecting and promoting US economic and security interests in the Asia-Pacific region.
He said the fundamental strategic decision to do so had been based on a “clear-eyed assessment” of US interests.
Medeiros said there was a strong demand from the region for enhanced US engagement.
Referring to moves at the UN over the past days pointing toward more US involvement in Syria and Iran, he said that events had generated a lot of attention on the Middle East.
“I am here to say simply that the rebalance to Asia is alive and well and is going to be reflected in lots of important activities over the next few weeks,” Medeiros said. “The US is a global super power.”
“We can work on the crisis of the day and continue to invest in our long term strategic interests which is what the rebalancing to the Asia-Pacific is all about,” he said.
“We can walk in Asia and chew gum in the Middle East at the same time without a problem,” Medeiros said.
He stressed that in the coming month, Obama, US Secretary of State John Kerry and US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel would all be visiting Asian countries.
Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia Daniel Russel who also briefed said the US had a “huge national interest” in the stability of the region.
However, as reported in the Taipei Times earlier this week, there are now widespread doubts in Washington about the rebalancing or pivot.
A panel of military analysts questioned during a meeting at the conservative Heritage Foundation if massive defense cuts and reductions in the overall US military structure would even allow a pivot to continue.
American Enterprise Institute (AEI) China scholar Michael Mazza wrote in a paper earlier this month that with all eyes focused on Syria the peace that had held in Asia for the past three decades continued to “slowly slip away.”
Recent developments in the South China Sea pointed to a less stable future, he said.
There was evidence that China was preparing to build a structure on the disputed Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島), Mazza said.
“And China isn’t the only country building on disputed territory in the South China Sea,” he said.
“Taipei, which has likewise seen a downturn in relations with Manila this year, has announced plans to construct a new wharf on Taiping Island [Itu Aba, 太平島], the largest of the disputed Spratlys Islands [Nansha Islands, 南沙群島], which Taiwan has long occupied,” Mazza said.
“The new dock will accommodate large supply ships and naval frigates. These investments in infrastructure, which will include upgrades to an airstrip on the island, will enhance Taiwan’s ability to defend Taiping Island as well as to more effectively project power into the South China Sea,” he said.
“Other disputants cannot help but wonder if Taipei and Beijing are coordinating their moves in the region. In fact, they are not, but the optics may put additional strains on Taiwan’s relations in Southeast Asia,” Mazza said.
Earlier this summer, Mazza wrote in another AEI paper that although Taiwan’s potential role in the US pivot toward Asia had been largely ignored, the nation was uniquely poised to be an important partner in the security component of the pivot.
“The US should help Taiwan shore up its air and sea defenses so that it can assist in deterring potential Chinese aggression, thus contributing to stability in the region,” he said.
‘CORNERED ENEMY’: China’s rise is threatening peace and stability, and the US would aim to restrict it with help from allies in the Asia-Pacific, Soong Hseik-wen said A draft bill on protecting Taiwan from invasion is likely to be passed by the US Congress, but it remains to be seen how US President Joe Biden’s administration would implement the act if it is passed, Taiwanese academics said on Sunday. US Senator Rick Scott and US Representative Guy Reschenthaler on Thursday reintroduced the proposed Taiwan Invasion Prevention Act, which was shelved in September last year due to the impending US presidential election. Arthur Ding (丁樹範), a professor at National Chengchi University’s College of International Affairs, and Soong Hseik-wen (宋學文), a professor at National Chung Cheng University’s Graduate Institute
OVERHAUL NEEDED: The government should improve its agricultural processing capabilities and expand to new markets to limit its reliance on China, an expert said China’s ban on Taiwanese pineapples was “unsurprising,” and Taiwan should have years ago altered its produce export strategies and target customers, experts said. China on Friday abruptly suspended imports of pineapples from Taiwan, saying that it had on multiple occasions discovered “harmful biological entities” on the fruit. Calling it an “unfriendly” move, the Council of Agriculture (COA) said that 99.79 percent of the pineapples sent to China since last year have met China’s import standards. Chiao Chun (焦鈞), the author of Fruits and Politics — A Recollection of Cross-strait Agricultural Interaction Over the Past Decade (水果政治學：兩岸農業交流十年回顧與展望), said that China’s announcement is clearly targeting
‘NOT COLD ENOUGH’: Schools are disregarding Premier Su Tseng-chang’s instruction that students may wear out-of-uniform clothing to stay warm, an association said An investigative report revealed that 72.5 percent of the nation’s senior-high schools and 95.6 percent of junior-high schools punish students for wearing unapproved winter clothes in contravention of educational guidelines, lawmakers and student rights advocates said yesterday. Speaking at a news conference at the Legislative Yuan, the Taiwan Youth Association for Democracy said there is an endemic disregard for the Ministry of Education’s regulations and that private schools are more likely to contravene ministry rules. The report is a compilation of 2,856 student reports about dress code reinforcement at 425 high schools and vocational high schools, the association said. Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌)
DISSATISFACTION? If the referendums collect more than 700,000 signatures each, they would have gotten the most signatures in the shortest time, the party said The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) two referendum petitions — one on banning the importation of pork with traces of ractopamine and the other on holding referendums on the same day as national elections — had as of Thursday gathered 691,398 and 674,497 signatures respectively, the party said yesterday. If the petitions collect more than 700,000 signatures apiece, they would have garnered the most signatures in the shortest time since the Referendum Act (公民投票法) was amended in 2017, party officials said. The KMT proposed the “anti-ractopamine pork” or “food safety” referendum just days after President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) announcement on Aug. 28 last