More than 100 people from Taoyuan County’s Jhongli City (中壢) yesterday urged the county government to take responsibility for store units that they bought about 20 years ago. The units were part of a seemingly promising shopping mall construction project, which was later found to be later illegal and the unit owners are yet to be reimbursed.
“We trusted the government, so my father and I did not hesitate to buy two store units when we saw it, each of them costing about NT$3 million [US$102,000] at the time, and we made a down payment of NT$2.86 million,” Peng Kang-mu (彭康木), one of the buyers, told a news conference at the Legislative Yuan.
“We borrowed money to make the down payment, but we didn’t get what we paid for, and haven’t got the money back either,” Peng said.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
The chairwoman of the buyers’ self-help organization, Chang Hsiu-jung (張秀榕), said the information they received in 1991 was that the county and the city governments planned to build a shopping mall with a parking lot and apartment units along the Laojie River (老街溪) that flows through Jhongli and that the government had contracted out the project to a private construction firm.
“We never thought there would be any problems because the local government endorsed it, but we only found out later the then-Taiwan Provincial Government only gave permission to build a parking lot, not a shopping center as was advertised,” Chang said.
“Hence, we never got to use the unit we bought for even a single day while the construction firm run a paid parking lot on the site,” Chang added.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
“The county government demolished the complex last year and we never get our money back,” she added.
Chang showed a video clip of a TV commercial and a poster for the shopping mall, in which the mall was described as a three-story building with a parking lot on the first floor, stores on the second and apartment units on the third.
She also showed a video clip of the late Taoyuan County Commissioner, Liu Pang-yu (劉邦友), speaking at a ceremony to launch construction of the complex on Jan. 15, 1991.
In the video, Liu said the construction project was “good news not only for Jhongli City, but also for Taoyuan County,” adding that once completed, the complex would provide 1,200 parking spaces and around 800 store units.
“The problem we’re facing today is the result of a wrongful decision made by the county and city governments 20 years ago. We’re shouldering the responsibility, but what have we done wrong? We didn’t do anything wrong,” the self-help organization’s vice chairman Liu Chin-lung (劉金龍) said.
He said it is unfair that the government is not taking responsibility for their mistake and that the construction firm has benefited from the project.
“The construction firm built the complex with our down payment money, though the shopping center was never inaugurated, they made money from running a parking lot on the site for the past 20 years,” Liu said. “And we the buyers, the most innocent stakeholders, are not getting anything.”
In response, deputy director of Taoyuan County Water Resources Bureau Chiu Feng-hsiu (邱峰旭) said the buyers are not allowed to use the store units because the county government would not issue licenses to use them.
“The problem was that the finished building was going to be different from what was allowed to be built when the county government issued the construction permit,” he said.
“We’ve tried to solve the issue by holding negotiations, but so far, no consensus has been reached,” he said.
Proposed legislation in the US outlines three conditions in which Washington would be authorized to protect Taiwan were China to invade, a report said yesterday. US Representative Ted Yoho this month said he would introduce a Taiwan Invasion Prevention Act, which would authorize US military force if China were to invade Taiwan-controlled areas, including its outlying islands. According to a version of the bill obtained by the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the sister paper of the Taipei Times), the bill lists three conditions in which a US president would be authorized to use military force to protect Taiwan: If China uses military force
The Supreme Court on Tuesday found four men guilty of attempted murder in the 2017 stabbing of Spanish surfer Ignacio Prio on a Pingtung County beach in the final ruling in the case, sentencing them to three-and-a-half to six years in prison. The defendants had appealed their convictions for attempted murder in the first and second rulings, which had also led to prison sentences ranging from three-and-a-half years to six years. The then-42-year-old Prio went to Jialeshui Beach (佳樂水) near Kenting (墾丁) on March 31, 2017, was attacked after he asked four men to remove their fishing lines from an area
Two new commuter trains are scheduled to be launched in January next year, the Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA) said yesterday. The acquisition of EMU-900 commuter train cars is part of the railway operator’s plan to replace 589 train cars that have been in operation for more than three decades. The agency has also placed orders to buy 600 intercity train cars. The first batch of 20 EMU-900 cars is to be delivered to the nation in September, although delivery might be delayed until October due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the agency said. The batch would be formed into two trains of 10
‘IMMORAL, INSINCERE’: Huang Kun-huei said that Ma was ‘distorting history’ in claiming that Lee Teng-hui laid the foundation for the so-called ‘1992 consensus’ Former Presidential Office secretary-general Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) on Saturday rejected former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) claim that former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) had been a proponent of Beijing’s “one China” principle. Lee, who served as president from 1988 to 2000, died in Taipei on Thursday last week. After visiting the Taipei Guest House on Saturday to pay his respects to Lee, Ma posted on Facebook that “28 years ago on this day” Lee hosted a session of the now-defunct National Unification Council, during which he passed a resolution on the “one China” principle. That resolution became the basis of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s