President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) “advisers” had considered three options for Taiwan’s 2008 UN bid, one being to “continue with the application, but do it ‘half-heartedly,’” a US cable released by WikiLeaks showed
Since 1993, Taiwan has submitted bids to the UN general assembly, which annually convenes in September, for full UN membership.
Starting in August 2008, Taiwan forwent its quest for UN full membership, instead seeking “meaningful participation” in the 16 auxiliary agencies of the UN.
A US cable dated June 25, 2008, and issued by the US consulate in Shanghai showed then-president of the Shanghai Institute for International Studies Yang Jiemian (楊潔勉) as saying “Ma’s advisers are still debating whether or not to suspend Taiwan’s application for United Nations membership this year.”
“There are three possible options: a) suspend the application if cross-Strait relations continue to improve; b) continue with the application but do it ‘half-heartedly’; c) continue with the application ‘more energetically’ to show Ma cares more than the [Democratic Progressive Party] DPP about Taiwan’s international space. Yang stated that Ma’s advisers have not reached a conclusion on this yet,” the cable says.
Yang, brother of Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jeichi (楊潔篪), told Kenneth Jarrett, then---consul-general of the US consulate in Shanghai, said that he learned that from high-level advisers to Ma during a recent trip to Taiwan, where he said he also met members of the DPP.
Another cable dated June 29, 2008, from the US embassy in Beijing showed that some Chinese academics initially thought that Ma would also propose a bid to join the UN that year, which Ma did not.
Tsinghua University professor Chu Shulong (楚樹龍) was quoted in the cable as saying that he “expects Taiwan to make a ‘pro forma’ effort to join the UN under the name Republic of China and that PRC [People’s Republic of China] will block the bid in a low-key manner.”
The same cable showed that the US embassy recorded different views held by some Chinese academies on how much leeway China would grant for Taiwan’s international space.
“China is interested in allowing Taiwan to expand its participation in international organizations ‘as appropriate.’ Beijing is worried, however, that in the future, the current ‘friendly’ KMT [Chinese Nationalist Party] regime could give way to a more independence-minded DPP administration, which could then use any gains the KMT had made for Taiwan in international space to push its independence goals,” Yuan Peng, director of the North American Institute at the Ministry of State Security--affiliated China Institutes for Contemporary International Relations, was quoted as saying.
Yuan said that “the current cross-Strait strategy is a ‘three-step program,’ with the Three Links as the first step, addressing the question of Taiwan’s international space as the second step and the issue of sovereignty reserved for last.”
Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (SIIS) vice president Chen Dongxiao (陳東曉) said in another cable dated Feb 13, 2009, that there would be progress on Taiwan’s international space after cross-strait relationships improve, but “PRC officials nevertheless worry that concessions made now could be used by Taiwan pro-independence forces in the future.”
“Some in China fear that PRC concessions on this issue could be used in the future by Taiwan ‘secessionists’ as a facade for real independence. As long as the ‘one China’ principle is preserved, the international space issue can be addressed in a prudent way,” Chen said.
A small number of Taiwanese this year lost their citizenship rights after traveling in China and obtaining a one-time Chinese passport to cross the border into Russia, a source said today. The people signed up through Chinese travel agencies for tours of neighboring Russia with companies claiming they could obtain Russian visas and fast-track border clearance, the source said on condition of anonymity. The travelers were actually issued one-time-use Chinese passports, they said. Taiwanese are prohibited from holding a Chinese passport or household registration. If found to have a Chinese ID, they may lose their resident status under Article 9-1
Taiwanese were praised for their composure after a video filmed by Taiwanese tourists capturing the moment a magnitude 7.5 earthquake struck Japan’s Aomori Prefecture went viral on social media. The video shows a hotel room shaking violently amid Monday’s quake, with objects falling to the ground. Two Taiwanese began filming with their mobile phones, while two others held the sides of a TV to prevent it from falling. When the shaking stopped, the pair calmly took down the TV and laid it flat on a tatami mat, the video shows. The video also captured the group talking about the safety of their companions bathing
PROBLEMATIC APP: Citing more than 1,000 fraud cases, the government is taking the app down for a year, but opposition voices are calling it censorship Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) yesterday decried a government plan to suspend access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書) for one year as censorship, while the Presidential Office backed the plan. The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday cited security risks and accusations that the Instagram-like app, known as Rednote in English, had figured in more than 1,700 fraud cases since last year. The company, which has about 3 million users in Taiwan, has not yet responded to requests for comment. “Many people online are already asking ‘How to climb over the firewall to access Xiaohongshu,’” Cheng posted on
A classified Pentagon-produced, multiyear assessment — the Overmatch brief — highlighted unreported Chinese capabilities to destroy US military assets and identified US supply chain choke points, painting a disturbing picture of waning US military might, a New York Times editorial published on Monday said. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s comments in November last year that “we lose every time” in Pentagon-conducted war games pitting the US against China further highlighted the uncertainty about the US’ capability to intervene in the event of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. “It shows the Pentagon’s overreliance on expensive, vulnerable weapons as adversaries field cheap, technologically